Stenberg v. Carhart: U.S. Supreme Court Decision
DON STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA, et al., PETITIONERS v. LEROY CARHARTNo. 99-830United States Supreme Court.Argued April 25, 2000Decided June 28, 2000
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: CRR’s Opposition to Petition for Rehearing En Banc
Pursuant to this Court’s order dated June 12, 2008, Plaintiffs-Appellees Richmond Medical Center for Women and William G. Fitzhugh, M.D. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) hereby respond to the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Defendants-Appellants Michael [...]
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: Virginia’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc
PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANCVirginia - 2008Virginia Attorney General Robert F. McDonnell, on behalf of Michael N. Herring, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, and Wade A. [...]
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: Second Fourth Circuit Panel Decision
This case involves a facial challenge under the Fourteenth Amendment to a Virginia statute that attempts to criminalize "partial birth abortion," which the statute terms "partial birth infanticide." In a summary judgment order the district [...]
Tysiac v. Poland: Decision of the Court
PROCEDURE1. The case originated in an application (no. 5410/03) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) [...]
Tysiac v. Poland: CRR Amicus Brief
Introduction1. The Center for Reproductive Rights submits these written comments pursuant to leave granted by the President of the Chamber in accordance with Rule 44 § 2 and § 4 of the Rules of the [...]
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: First Fourth Circuit Panel Decision
We reconsider the constitutionality of a Virginia statute that outlaws what is termed “partial birth infanticide.” Va.Code Ann. § 18.2-71.1 (the Virginia Act or the Act). Reconsideration is required in light of Gonzales v. Carhart [...]
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: District Court Decision
Physicians and medical clinics challenged constitutionality of Virginia statute criminalizing “partial birth infanticide,” and sought injunctive relief.
Reproductive rights are human rights.
Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.
A.S. v. Hungary: CEDAW Ruling
Communication No. 4/2004Submitted by: Ms. A. S. (represented by the European Roma Rights Center and the Legal Defence Bureau for National and Ethnic Minorities)Alleged victim: The authorState party: HungaryDate of communication: 12 February 2004 (initial [...]
A.S. v. Hungary: Amicus Brief
UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMENSUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION RE:A.S. V. HUNGARYCOMMUNICATION NO: 4/2004This memorandum offers comments in the case of A.S. v. Hungary. It is submitted by the Center [...]
Vo. v. France: Amicus Brief
Introduction1. These written comments are submitted by the Center for Reproductive Rights pursuant to leave granted by the President of the Grand Chamber in accordance with Rule 44 § 2 of the Rules of Court. [...]
D. v. Ireland: Amicus Brief
Introduction1. These written comments are submitted by the Center for Reproductive Rights pursuant to leave granted by the President of the Chamber in accordance with Rule 44 § 2 and § 4 of the Rules [...]
Reproductive rights are human rights.
Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.
