Recent Case Highlights

The Center for Reproductive Rights is litigating dozens of cases in state, national and regional courts against harmful laws that restrict access to abortion and other reproductive rights.

Below are highlights of some of the Center’s current and recent cases.

Lawsuit Filed to Block Texas Abortion Ban

The Center and its partners filed a lawsuit July 13 to block an extreme Texas law that bans abortion care after approximately six weeks of pregnancy, before many people know they are pregnant. The law, S.B. 8, incentivizes private individuals—including anti-abortion activists—to seek monetary penalties and injunctions by suing anyone who performs an abortion or assists someone in obtaining one.  By shifting enforcement from state officials to private individuals, the state is attempting to evade legal accountability in court.  

“This radical law will isolate people seeking to exercise their constitutional right to abortion care by targeting their entire support network and discouraging their loved ones from providing help and support for fear of being sued,” said Marc Hearron, Senior Counsel at the Center. 

Read more:


U.S. Supreme Court to Review Mississippi 15-week Abortion Ban

“Alarm bells are ringing loudly about the threat to reproductive rights. The Supreme Court just agreed to review an abortion ban that unquestionably violates nearly 50 years of Supreme Court precedent and is a test case to overturn Roe v. Wade.”

Nancy Northup

President & CEO

Center for Reproductive Rights

The Center for Reproductive Rights will be returning to the United States Supreme Court next term to defend the right to abortion, a right recognized in the landmark Roe v. Wade decision in 1973. On May 17, the Court announced it will hear Mississippi’s appeal of an appellate court decision that threw out Mississippi’s law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy in Jackson Women’s Health Organization v. Dobbs.

This is the first time the Court will rule on the constitutionality of a pre-viability abortion ban since Roe. The Court’s ruling in Roe recognized that the decision whether to continue a pregnancy or have an abortion, which impacts a person’s body, health, family and future, belongs to the individual, not the government. Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center, said in a statement: Alarm bells are ringing loudly about the threat to reproductive rights. The Supreme Court just agreed to review an abortion ban that unquestionably violates nearly 50 years of Supreme Court precedent and is a test case to overturn Roe v. Wade.”

Read more: 


Appeals Court Affirms Decision Striking Down North Carolina Abortion Ban

On June 16, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s decision striking down to strike down a North Carolina abortion ban, rejecting the state’s claims that abortion providers did not have standing to challenge the law. The law banned abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy, except in extremely narrow instances of medical emergency. “This ruling is a victory for all North Carolinians and is in line with decades of Supreme Court precedent,” said Genevieve Scott, Senior Staff Attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

 Read more: 

Appeals Court Affirms Decision Striking Down Unconstitutional Abortion Ban, 06/16/21

 Case background: Bryant, et al. vs. Woodall, et al.

U.S. – Abortion 

Kansas Abortion Method Ban Blocked

In April 2021, a state court permanently blocked a Kansas ban on the standard method of abortion after 14 to 15 weeks of pregnancy, reaffirming a 2019 ruling by the Kansas Supreme Court establishing that the right to abortion is protected by the Kansas Constitution, independently of the protections afforded by the U.S. Constitution. The 2021 ruling is the final decision on the merits of the case, upholding the Kansas Supreme Court’s ruling that “the right to personal autonomy is firmly embedded” within the state’s “natural rights guarantee and its included concepts of liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” 

 Read more: 

Kansas Court Strikes Down Abortion Method Ban, Reaffirming Right to Abortion Under State Constitution, 04/12/21

Kansas Ban on Standard Abortion Method Struck Down as Unconstitutional, 04/07/21

 Kansas Supreme Court Says State Constitution Protects Abortion, 05/02/19

 Case background: Hodes & Nauser MDs, P.A., et al. v. Schmidt & Howe 

U.S. – Abortion 

Tennessee 48-hour Waiting Period Allowed to Take Effect

In April 2021, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals allowed Tennessee’s 48-hour mandatory waiting period to take effect immediately, granting the state’s request to suspend a lower court’s decision striking it down pending appeal. Oral argument in this case was held June 2, 2021, before the Sixth Circuit.

The Tennessee law requires patients to make two trips to a provider and wait at least two days to access abortion services after receiving in-person, state-mandated biased counseling. In striking down the law in October 2020, Federal District Court Judge Bernard Friedman wrote, “Defendants’ suggestion that women are overly emotional and must be required to cool off or calm down before having a medical procedure they have decided they want to have, and that they are constitutionally entitled to have, is highly insulting and paternalistic – and all the more so given that no such waiting periods apply to men.”

Read more:

Appeals Court Reinstates Forced Waiting Period for Abortion in Tennessee, 04/23/21

Tennessee’s Mandatory Waiting Period for Abortion: “Highly Insulting and Paternalistic,” 10/27/20

Federal Court Strikes Down Tennessee’s Forced Waiting Period for Abortions, 10/14/20


Inter-American Court of Human Rights Hears Case of Salvadoran Woman Unjustly Imprisoned

The Center for Reproductive Rights and its local partner in El Salvador presented oral arguments before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in March 2021 in Manuela v. El Salvador. The case centers around a Salvadoran woman, Manuela, who was unjustly sentenced to 30 years in prison for aggravated homicide after suffering an obstetric emergency that resulted in her pregnancy loss. Manuela died imprisoned two years later after receiving inadequate medical diagnosis and treatment for cancer. In this case, the Court will have the opportunity to recognize how El Salvador’s absolute denial and criminalization of reproductive health services discriminates against and causes violence against women who suffer obstetric emergencies, denying them due process. 

Inter-American Court of Human Rights Hears Case of Salvadoran Woman Imprisoned After Obstetric Emergency, 3/10/21

Center to Argue at Inter-American Court of Human Rights for Salvadoran Woman Imprisoned After Suffering Obstetric Emergency, 03/04/21

Case background: Manuela v. El Salvador (Inter-American Court of Human Rights)

AbortionLatin America and the Caribbean Inter-American Human Rights System 

South Carolina Six-week Abortion Ban Blocked

In March 2021, a federal district court granted a preliminary injunction blocking South Carolina’s six-week ban on abortion. In this case, the Center for Reproductive Rights and its joined partners are challenging the ban as unconstitutional and a violation of almost 50 years of Supreme Court precedent.  “There’s no way around it: Banning abortion before viability is blatantly unconstitutional, and we are relieved this law remains blocked,” said Nancy Northup, President and CEO at the Center for Reproductive Rights. 

Center for Reproductive Rights Blocks South Carolina Abortion Ban as Litigation Continues, 03/19/21

Federal Court Blocks South Carolina’s Unconstitutional Ban on Abortion02/19/21  

Case documents

U.S. Abortion 

Arkansas: Four Anti-Abortion Laws Blocked

In this case, Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H. v. Larry Jegley, et al., the Center and the ACLU are challenging four Arkansas anti-abortion laws enacted in 2017, including a ban on the standard procedure for abortions after about 14-15 weeks. In January 2021, the Eastern District Court of Arkansas granted a preliminary injunction that blocks the laws while the case proceeds. “Today’s decision brings welcome, but temporary, relief to those seeking time-sensitive and essential abortion care in Arkansas,” said Jenny Ma, senior staff attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights.  

ACLU and Center for Reproductive Rights Win in Federal Court, Blocking Four Anti-Abortion Laws in Arkansas01/05/21

Case background: Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H. v. Larry Jegley, et al. 

U.S. Abortion 

Ecuador Issues Apology in Adolescent Abuse Case

In compliance with a ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights that held Ecuador responsible for failing to protect Paola Guzmán Albarracín from abuse at her school, Ecuador President Lenín Moreno issued a public apology to Paola’s family in December 2020. The wide-reaching ruling in the case, Paola Guzmán Albarracín v. Ecuador, issued in August 2020, set standards to protect schoolgirls from sexual violence throughout the Latin American region.  

Read more: 
Ecuador’s President Issues Public Apology for Teenager’s Death in Landmark Sexual Violence Case, 12/09/20

Landmark Ruling Will Help Protect Schoolgirls from Sexual Violence Throughout Latin America08/17/20

Case background: Paola Guzmán Albarracín v. Ecuador: Inter-American Court of Human Rights 

Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and RightsLatin America and the CaribbeanInter-American Court of Human Rights 

IACHR Hears Case of Salvadoran Women Unjustly Imprisoned

The Center for Reproductive Rights and its partners appeared before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) in December and urged it to recommend that El Salvador free 12 women unjustly imprisoned in unsafe conditions and at risk for COVID-19. Arrested for incidents related to obstetric emergencies during their pregnancies, the women were unjustly accused of illegal abortions and convicted of aggravated homicide or attempted homicide. Abortion is illegal in El Salvador under all circumstances—even in cases of rape or incest or to save a woman’s life. 

Read more: 
Center Appeals to Inter-American Commission on Human Rights for Release of Unjustly Imprisoned Salvadoran Women12/08/20 

AbortionLatin America and the Caribbean Inter-American Human Rights System 

Tennessee Medication Abortion “Reversal” Law Blocked

The Center and its partners have sued to block a Tennessee law requiring doctors to lie to patients by telling them that medication abortions can be “reversed.” Such a “reversal” claim is unproven, politically motivated, and without basis in medical research. A temporary restraining order was granted in September 2020, and a preliminary injunction granted in February 2021.


Tennessee’s Medically Unsound ‘Abortion Reversal’ Law Remains Blocked By Federal Courts, 02/26/21
Center and Partners Challenge Tennessee Medication Abortion “Reversal” Law09-03-20  


Texas Ban on Abortion Procedure Before the Circuit Court

In Whole Woman’s Health v. Paxton, the Center is challenging a Texas ban on the standard procedure for abortion care after about 14-15 weeks. A three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower court’s decision that permanently struck down the law as unconstitutional after a trial on the merits; but in an unusual move, in October the full Circuit Court granted, on its own motion, a rehearing by the full Court. Oral argument was held before the Fifth Circuit in January 2021.

Texas Ban on Standard Abortion Procedure Struck Down; Would Have Interfered with Doctors’ Judgment10/14/20

Case background: Whole Woman’s Health v. Paxton 


To search for more case news and developments, click here. 

Search the Center’s case archive here.

Are you a Champion?

Start a monthly donation today and your first gift will be MATCHED 5:1!

Scroll Up