Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • #TheForwardFight
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Precedent and the Rule of Law: Spotlight on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • #TheForwardFight
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Type:

News, Story, Uncategorized

Case Archive

For updates on Center cases, explore our case archive here.

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

11.17.2021

In the Courts Abortion United States Story

Precedent and the Rule of Law: Spotlight on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health

Stephanie Harmon
Nearly 50 years of precedent hang in the balance in upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case.

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
©Billion Photos/Shutterstock

On December 1, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case in which the state of Mississippi has asked the Supreme Court to overturn nearly 50 years of precedent affirming the constitutional right to abortion.  

Rule of Law

The “rule of law” is a legal principle holding that a society’s laws must be consistently applied, publicly available, and subject to an independent judiciary that adheres to precedent.

The case—which challenges Mississippi’s law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy—is the most consequential Supreme Court case for abortion rights in generations. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health was brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights and its partners in 2018 on behalf of Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the last abortion clinic in Mississippi. 

Nearly 50 years ago, the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right to abortion prior to viability in the landmark case, Roe v. Wade (1973). The Court has repeatedly upheld Roe ever since, including in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey in 1992. Mississippi’s ban is in blatant violation of decades of precedent affirming the constitutional right to abortion.  

The Court’s decision to review the Mississippi abortion ban marks the first time it will consider the constitutionality of a pre-viability ban on abortion since the 1973 Roe decision.

Listen to oral arguments on December 1.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health: Supreme Court oral arguments Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Supreme Court oral arguments link

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health: Supreme Court oral arguments

A livestream of oral arguments will be available on the Supreme Court’s website on Wednesday, December 1 at 10 a.m.

Constitutional and Legal Experts File Amicus Briefs in Support of Center’s Challenge

Constitutional scholars and legal experts have submitted several amicus briefs, also known as “friend of the court” briefs, in support of the Center’s case. The briefs describe how the right to abortion is firmly grounded in the U.S. Constitution and warn that a decision upholding Mississippi’s ban would upend decades of settled precedent and, in so doing, undermine the rule of law. 

SCOTUS has Repeatedly Affirmed that the Right to Abortion is Firmly Grounded in the U.S. Constitution

In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the right to decide whether to continue a pregnancy prior to viability, and has repeatedly reaffirmed this right. 

In its brief, the American Bar Association (ABA)—the largest voluntary association of lawyers and attorneys in the world—points out that “the right to choose whether to bear a child is an integral part of our understanding of constitutionally protected liberty” that is firmly grounded in decades of Court precedent. 

The ABA writes: “Roe and Casey thus built on the Court’s prior precedents protecting the right to make personal decisions regarding marriage, family, and childrearing, pointing to cases dating back to the 1920s…The right described in Roe and reaffirmed in Casey was not called into being out of thin air, but was the result of years of consideration by the Court of what liberty encompasses when applied to the realm of children and family.” 

Read more about the case.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization link

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

In this case, the most consequential abortion rights case in generations, the U.S. Supreme Court will consider a Mississippi abortion ban that directly challenges Roe v. Wade.

Similarly, as scholars of constitutional law write in their brief that for “over a century,” the Court has “repeatedly acknowledged” that the Constitution’s Due Process Clause “provides individuals with certain unenumerated, fundamental rights grounded in liberty, a concept older than our Constitution itself.” And the Court was thus “guided by the meaning of the liberty interest expounded in these prior decisions” when it concluded in Roe  that the Constitution’s guarantee of liberty encompasses a person’s decision to have an abortion.  

Upholding Precedent is Crucial for the Rule of Law

The “rule of law” is a legal principle holding that a society’s laws must be consistently applied, publicly available, and subject to an independent judiciary that adheres to precedent. The rule of law is crucial for the creation of a stable, orderly, and just society.  

Consistent adherence to, and application of, the principle of stare decisis is integral to upholding the rule of law. As the Court has explained, “stare decisis is a foundation stone of the rule of law.” It provides the foundation for a legal system that is predictable and stable—and one not subject to dramatic reversals in law or how it is applied. The ABA states that it has “long viewed stare decisis as fundamental to the rule of law and central to this Court’s special role as the exemplar of the rule of law. To abandon it here would severely damage both.” 

Under the legal principle of stare decisis, meaning “to stand by that which is decided,” the Supreme Court adheres to its prior decisions in all but the most exceptional circumstances—circumstances that are not met in Jackson Women’s Health.  

As leading scholars and legal practitioners argue in their briefs to the Court, under the principle of stare decisis, there is no basis for the Supreme Court to upend longstanding precedent recognizing the constitutional right to abortion.  

In their brief, constitutional law scholars state that “…stare decisis requires that the Court uphold Roe and Casey, and the viability line drawn therein. Stare decisis is the cornerstone of the Court’s jurisprudence and the bedrock of its legitimacy, and there is no justifiable reason to abandon this principle here. The viability line is logical and workable, and one of many lines this Court has drawn to protect constitutional liberties.” 

As the ABA writes in its brief, “For forty-eight years, the right to decide to have an abortion before viability has become embedded in the fabric of our society and the understanding of women as a fundamental right that affects women in every way from economics, to health, to career choices and family life. The revocation of such a right would be unprecedented. It would be a devastating repudiation of stare decisis, jeopardize the public’s faith in our legal institutions, and have a cruel effect on the lives and expectations of millions of women.” 

These briefs are among over 50 amicus briefs filed supporting this case. For more information, go to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. 

Read more:

  • Constitutional Law Scholars Amicus Brief in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health
  • American Bar Association Amicus Brief in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health
  • Read more about the amicus briefs filed in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: Links to the more than 50 briefs filed in the case.
  • Read more about the Center’s case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
  • The case explained: Watch Center attorneys explain the stakes in the case. 

Tags: SCOTUS, Scotus Mississippi abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, Rule of Law

Related Posts

Brief for Petitioners – June Medical Services v. Gee

Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts

Join us at the U.S. Supreme Court to rally for abortion access

On Wednesday, March 4, the Center for Reproductive Rights will present arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in June Medical Services v. Russo (formerly June Medical Services v. Gee)—a...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Roe at Risk: U.S. Supreme Court to Review Mississippi’s Abortion Ban, a Direct Challenge to Roe v. Wade

The Center for Reproductive Rights will return to the United States Supreme Court next term to defend the right to...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts
Roe at Risk: U.S. Supreme Court to Review Mississippi’s Abortion Ban, a Direct Challenge to Roe v. Wade

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2023)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up