Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • #TheForwardFight
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

European Parliament Votes to Condemn Texas Abortion Ban

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • #TheForwardFight
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion

Regions:

Europe, United States

Work:

Engaging Policymakers, Around the World

Type:

News, Story

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

10.12.2021

Engaging Policymakers Abortion Europe News

European Parliament Votes to Condemn Texas Abortion Ban

Megan Diamondstein
Denouncing the Texas law as “a strong attack on women’s freedom,” the European Parliament passes an “urgency resolution” and calls on the U.S. to protect abortion access.

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Joining vocal condemnation of Texas’s extreme abortion ban, the European Parliament on October 6 adopted an urgency resolution condemning the law, S.B. 8, which went into effect on September 1. The law bans all abortion care after approximately six weeks of pregnancy – before most know they’re pregnant – and has ended most abortion access in the state.

Read about the Center’s case challenging the Texas abortion ban.

Whole Woman’s Health et al. v. Jackson et al.Whole Woman’s Health et al. v. Jackson et al. link

Whole Woman’s Health et al. v. Jackson et al.

The “European Parliament resolution on the state law relating to abortion in Texas, USA,” passed 381 to 253 with 36 abstentions, strongly rebukes the Texas law and calls on both the state of Texas and the U.S. government to take action to protect abortion rights and access.

The resolution widely denounces the Texas law, claiming that it “de facto amounts to a total ban on abortion,” particularly due to its lack of exception in cases of “rape, incest, or fetal health conditions incompatible with sustained life after birth.” The resolution affirms that sexual and reproductive rights are human rights and argues that the law “flagrantly violates” women’s rights under the U.S. Constitution. Concern is also expressed for the law’s disproportionate impact on people such as those living on low-incomes and in rural areas, Black, Indigenous, and other people of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, and other populations who experience systemic discrimination and who are now more likely to face financial and/or logistical barriers to legal abortion access.

“We applaud the European Parliament for taking action to condemn Texas’s extreme abortion ban, which is a clear violation of international human rights,” said Risa Kaufman, U.S. Human Rights Director at the Center for Reproductive Rights. “This action—together with the ban’s denunciation by UN human rights experts last month—reflect powerful international condemnation of S.B. 8 and retrogression on abortion rights in the United States. It is a strong statement regarding human rights protections for abortion access.” The UN human rights experts called the Texas ban a violation of international law.

Retrogression on U.S. Abortion Rights

Human Rights and the Fight Against Retrogression in the U.S.

“Human rights experts and the global community are taking notice” of the U.S. retrogression on abortion rights, says Risa E. Kaufman, the Center’s Director, U.S. Human Rights, in this piece for Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters (SRHM).

Urgency Resolutions Issued Only for Grave Human Rights Situations

The European Parliament adopts urgency resolutions in response to pressing human rights situations of grave concern in countries outside the European Union. Urgency resolutions are important political statements that reflect the position of the European Parliament and often include calls on national authorities and EU institutions to address the situation through foreign policy tools and action. Notably, these resolutions are rarely used in relation to Western democracies or in relation to reproductive rights concerns. The Texas ban is of grave concern, the resolution argues, and a “strong attack on women’s freedom.”

The Center has been advocating for strong EU action in response to regression on sexual and reproductive rights around the world. “We believe that EU action in response to efforts to roll back protections for sexual and reproductive rights – no matter where they occur – is critical,” said Katrine Thomasen, the Center’s Europe Senior Legal Adviser. “Human rights law is unequivocal that retrogression on sexual and reproductive rights is not acceptable and such attempts must be denounced and rejected by EU institutions in the strongest possible terms as contrary to EU values and human rights standards,” added Thomasen.

More on the Center’s work at the EU.

Advocating for SRHR at the European Union and the Council of Europe

Resolution Calls for Action by Texas, the U.S., and the EU

The European Parliament resolution expressly calls on both the governments of Texas and the U.S. to take action to protect abortion rights and access. Specifically, it urges Texas to repeal S.B. 8 and ensure that “safe, legal, free, and good quality abortion services” are available and easily accessible to all women and girls in the state. 

The resolution requests that the U.S. federal government establish legal protections for universal access to abortion, stressing that health care is a human right and the state is obligated to provide accessible health care to all. It calls on the U.S. Congress to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA), which safeguards abortion access from state-level bans and restrictions. WHPA – a bill that the Center has long advocated for — was recently passed in the House of Representatives in an historic vote, but still needs to be considered by the Senate.

The resolution calls on the EU to take several actions, including denouncing S.B. 8 in communications with US officials, monitoring the protection of SRHR in the U.S., and asking EU member states to offer financial and other support to U.S.-based civil society organizations protecting SRHR and those offering safe haven for medical professionals who might be a risk of legal or other harassment as a result of their work.

Both the UN experts and the European Parliament agree that the backsliding in women’s rights, and sexual and reproductive health rights in particular, endangers lives and is an issue of grave importance that must be urgently addressed by national and international governing bodies.

More About the Texas Abortion Ban

Texas law S.B. 8 prohibits abortion care after approximately six weeks of pregnancy and incentivizes individuals—including anti-abortion activists—to seek monetary penalties of at least $10,000 by suing anyone who provides an abortion or assists someone in obtaining one after the law’s limit. The law was enacted in direct violation of Roe v. Wade and was designed to skirt judicial review.

The ban went into effect on September 1 and ended most abortion care in the state.  It was temporarily blocked by a federal district court on October 6 in a case brought by the Department of Justice, but on October 8 the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the injunction and allowed the law to again take effect.

The Center for Reproductive Rights is challenging the Texas ban in two cases: Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson et al. was filed in July in an attempt to block the law before taking effect; and Braid v. Stilley was filed in October defending a Texas physician who violated the ban.

Read more about the Center’s cases challenging the Texas law here:

  • Whole Woman’s Health et al. v. Jackson et al.
  • Braid v. Stilley

Tags: EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, Texas abortion ban, Whole Woman's Health et al. v. Jackson et al., Texas abortion law, Texas abortion ban S.B. 8, Braid v. Stilley, EU

Related Posts

EU Resolution Calls for Full Realization of SRHR in the EU

The European Parliament passed today a resolution affirming that sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) are fundamental human rights...

Abortion, Assisted Reproduction, Contraception, Maternal Health,Europe,Engaging Policymakers, Around the World
EU Resolution Calls for Full Realization of SRHR in the EU

European Parliament Calls on U.S. to Protect Abortion Rights

Resolution expresses grave concern about the consequences to women’s rights if the U.S. Supreme Court were to revoke the constitutional...

Abortion,Europe, United States, Accountability Bodies, European Human Rights System,Engaging Policymakers, Around the World
European Parliament Calls on U.S. to Protect Abortion Rights

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2023)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up