Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Access Independent Health Services, Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Drew H. Wrigley (North Dakota)

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Litigation by State

  • Overview
  • Arizona
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Louisiana
  • Mississippi
  • North Dakota
  • Oklahoma
  • South Carolina
  • Texas

Share this page

Donate Now

Join Now

Post-Roe State Abortion Ban Litigation

Access Independent Health Services, Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Drew H. Wrigley (North Dakota)

Filing date: 07.07.2022
This case challenged North Dakota’s “trigger” abortion ban, and then its amended near-total abortion ban.

Share this page

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id

Case update: On September 12, 2024, North Dakota’s total abortion ban was ruled unconstitutional by a state court, meaning that abortion will again be legal in the state. Read more about the ruling here. On October 10, 2024, the state’s motion to stay the ruling was denied. A trial in the case was held March 25, 2025, at the North Dakota Supreme Court.


In 2007, North Dakota lawmakers passed H.B. 1466, a “trigger” ban which was designed to outlaw most of the abortion services in the state within 30 days of judgment if the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. The law would make it a felony to provide abortion care, with exceptions only for the life of the mother, rape, or incest.

After the Supreme Court took away the constitutional right to abortion on June 24, 2022, the Center for Reproductive Rights and its partners filed a lawsuit on July 7 challenging North Dakota’s ban. The lawsuit, Access Independent Health Services, Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Drew H. Wrigley, argued that the ban violates the North Dakota Constitution, which protects abortion under the rights of life, liberty, safety, and happiness.

The lawsuit also disputed the trigger ban’s effective date, as the U.S. Supreme Court’s judgments are typically issued at least 25 days after its opinions are released. However, North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley triggered the ban just days after the Supreme Court released its opinion revoking the constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and wrongly stated that abortion would be banned in the state after July 28.

The Burleigh County District Court first issued a temporary restraining order blocking the trigger ban on July 27, holding that Attorney General Wrigley’s certification of the law was premature and that the ban was set to go into effect on August 26.

On August 25, the district court blocked North Dakota’s trigger ban. The court issued a preliminary injunction blocking the ban until a further court order is issued or litigation ends. On October 31, the district court judge once again blocked the ban from taking effect, noting that there is a “substantial probability” that the challenge will succeed. As a result, abortion remained legal in North Dakota while litigation continued. 

Oral arguments were presented on November 29, 2022, at the North Dakota Supreme Court. 

North Dakota Supreme Court Ruling

On March 16, 2023, the North Dakota Supreme Court blocked the state’s “trigger ban,” because it did not allow for life- or health-preserving abortions. The Court held that the “North Dakota Constitution explicitly provides all citizens of North Dakota the right of enjoying and defending life and pursuing and obtaining safety. These rights implicitly include the right to obtain an abortion to preserve the woman’s life or health.” With the ruling, abortion remained legal in North Dakota while litigation in state court continued.

The following month, North Dakota lawmakers passed an amended near-total abortion ban, which is currently in effect. The medical exceptions language in the ban is extremely vague and makes it unclear how sick or near-death a patient must be before a doctor can intervene, or whether abortion is permitted when the fetus has a fatal condition. The ban contains a similarly confusing and narrow sex offenses exception that is limited to the first six weeks of pregnancy and would force physicians to determine whether a sex offense occurred before being able to provide an abortion. 

The state’s amended abortion ban was at issue at a hearing held December 20 at the North Dakota District Court. The hearing addressed the Center’s request for a preliminary injunction to prohibit enforcement of the state’s amended abortion ban against physicians who in their good faith medical judgment, and in consultation with their patients, provide a health-preserving abortion.

In a preliminary ruling on January 23, 2024, the state court denied the Center’s request for a preliminary injunction. The court did not address the constitutional questions that are the focus of the case and will issue a final ruling after a hearing on the merits of the case.

Ban Ruled Unconstitutional

On September 12, 2024, the court ruled North Dakota’s total abortion ban unconstitutional, meaning that abortion will again be legal in the state. Since the state’s constitution guarantees the fundamental right to make medical judgments affecting one’s bodily integrity, Judge Bruce Romanick’s opinion said it “specifically protects a woman’s right to procreative autonomy – including to seek and obtain a pre-viability abortion.” Read about that ruling here.

The state’s motion to stay the ruling was denied on October 10, 2024.

A trial is scheduled to be held at 10 a.m. on March 25, 2025, at the North Dakota Supreme Court.

Attorneys and Plaintiffs

Center Attorneys: Meetra Mehdizadeh 

Co-Counsel/Cooperating Attorneys: Christina A. Sambor, Weil, Gotshal & Manges 

Plaintiffs: Red River Women’s Clinic, on behalf of itself and its patients; Kathryn L. Eggleston, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients; Ana Tobiasz, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients; Erica Hofland, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients; and Collette Lessard, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients

Timeline:

June 24, 2022 The U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade and takes away the constitutional right to abortion. The Attorney General issues a statement certifying that North Dakota’s trigger ban, which prohibits nearly all abortions in the state, would take effect in 30 days.
July 07, 2022 The Center and its partners challenge H.B. 1466 in Burleigh County District Court, arguing that the ban violates the North Dakota Constitution.
July 27, 2022 The district court issues a temporary restraining order blocking the ban, on the basis that the attorney general’s certification of the trigger ban on June 24 was premature.
August 25, 2022 The district court issues a preliminary injunction, blocking the ban while litigation continues.
October 31, 2022 Following an order from the state supreme court to reconsider his August 25 decision, the district court judge once again issues a decision blocking the ban from going into effect. The judge’s order further finds that there is a “substantial probability” the challenge will succeed.
November 29, 2022 Oral arguments are held at the North Dakota Supreme Court.
March 16, 2023 The North Dakota Supreme Court rules that the state’s “trigger” total abortion ban can remain blocked since the Center’s challenge to the ban is likely to succeed. Abortion remains legal in North Dakota while litigation in state court continues.
April 24, 2023 North Dakota enacts an amended near-total abortion ban.
June 12, 2023 The Center files an amended complaint.
December 20, 2023 Hearing takes place at the North Dakota District Court on the Center’s request for a preliminary injunction to prohibit enforcement of the state’s amended ban against physicians who provide health-preserving abortion care.
January 23, 2024 The court denies the Center’s request to block the law while the case proceeds on the merits.
September 12, 2024 North Dakota’s total abortion ban is ruled unconstitutional by a state court, meaning that abortion will again be legal in the state.
October 10, 2024 The state’s motion to stay the ruling was denied.
March 25, 2025 Trial held at the North Dakota Supreme Court at 10:00 a.m.

Legal documents:

  • Order Denying Motion to Stay, 10.10.24
  • State Court Ruling, 09.12.24
  • Order Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 01.23.24
  • Amended Complaint, 06.12.23
  • North Dakota Supreme Court ruling, 03.16.23
  • Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 08.25.22
  • Temporary Restraining Order, 07.28.22
  • Complaint, 07.07.22

Amicus briefs:

A range of experts filed amicus (“friend of the court”) briefs in support of the plaintiffs in this case. The briefs were filed in the North Dakota Supreme Court regarding the state’s appeal of a lower district court ruling declaring the ban unconstitutional under the state’s constitution.

Read the briefs here submitted by major medical groups, medical students, legal historians, and scholars of self-defense rights.

Read more:

  • Victory in North Dakota! Abortion Will Again Be Legal in the State, 09.13.24
  • Press release: North Dakota Court Rules State Abortion Ban Unconstitutional, 09.12.24
  • Press release: North Dakota Court Keeps Abortion Ban in Place for Now, Even for Those Facing Serious Health Risks, 01.23.24
  • Abortion Remains Legal in North Dakota as Court Blocks Total Ban, 03.16.23
  • Press release: North Dakota Supreme Court Says “Trigger” Ban is Likely Unconstitutional, 03.16.23
  • Press release: Challenge Filed to Block North Dakota’s Trigger Ban, 07.07.22

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Legal Protections, Legal Restrictions

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Case Status:

Open

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2024)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Better Business Bureau Charity Watch Top Rated Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up
You can have 2X the impact.

All gifts doubled through June 30.

GIVE NOW
Abortion is Essential sign