Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

SisterSong v. State of Georgia

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Litigation by State

  • Overview
  • Arizona
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Louisiana
  • Mississippi
  • North Dakota
  • Oklahoma
  • South Carolina
  • Texas

Share this page

Donate Now

Join Now

Post-Roe State Abortion Ban Litigation

SisterSong v. State of Georgia

Filing date: 07.26.2022
This case challenges Georgia’s H.B. 481, which bans abortion after approximately six weeks of pregnancy.

Share this page

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id

Status: After a Georgia state court ruled in September 2024 to permanently block the state’s six-week abortion ban, declaring the ban unconstitutional under the Georgia constitution’s fundamental right to privacy, Georgia’s Attorney General appealed the ruling to the Georgia Supreme Court, which then reinstated the ban while the case proceeds at the Court. On February 20, 2025, the Georgia Supreme Court vacated the district court’s ruling and remanded the case to the district court for reconsideration of the plaintiffs’ standing to bring their claims.


In SisterSong v. State of Georgia, the Center for Reproductive Rights and its partners filed a state constitutional challenge seeking to block H.B. 481, which bans abortion after approximately six weeks of pregnancy, from taking effect. The lawsuit, filed on July 26, 2022, asserted that the six-week abortion ban violates the Georgia Constitution’s robust protection for the fundamental right to privacy, which is independent of the U.S. Constitution.  

The lawsuit also argued that H.B. 481 is unconstitutional because it clearly violated Roe v. Wade when enacted in 2019, making it void from inception, regardless of the subsequent change to federal law. Georgia’s constitution provides that a law that violates either the state or federal constitution when passed is forever void. 

The Center and its partners first challenged H.B. 481 in Sistersong v. Kemp (2019), shortly after Gov. Brian Kemp signed the ban into law. In 2020, a federal district court blocked the ban from taking effect. But after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the federal district court’s injunction, allowing the ban to take effect on July 20, 2022. 

On August 15, the Superior Court of Fulton County ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to temporarily block H.B. 481 before deciding its constitutionality on the merits, allowing the ban to remain in effect as litigation continued. On October 24–25, the Superior Court heard the parties’ evidence in the trial on plaintiffs’ challenge to H.B. 481. 

On November 15, Judge Robert McBurney of the Superior Court of Fulton County struck down the ban as void and without legal basis since it violated Roe v. Wade when it was enacted in 2019.  

Judge McBurney further found that a subsequent change in federal constitutional law, which happened when the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Roe, does not revive the ban. Instead, if the legislature wishes to ban abortion, it must pass a new law “in the sharp glare of public attention that will undoubtedly and properly attend such an important and consequential debate,” Judge McBurney wrote in his order. 

Just a week later, on November 23, the Georgia Supreme Court granted an emergency stay of the injunction, allowing the ban to take effect once again while the state’s appeal continues. 

On October 24, 2023, the Georgia Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s ruling that the law was void from inception, allowing the ban to remain in effect. The case was returned to the trial court to rule on the remaining claims brought by the plaintiffs that the ban violates Georgians’ rights to privacy and equal protection under the state constitution.

Ban Ruled Unconstitutional by Georgia State Court

The Superior Court of Fulton County ruled on September 30 that Georgia’s six-week abortion ban is unconstitutional and that abortion is protected under the state constitution’s fundamental right to privacy. The ruling permanently blocks the ban, which prohibits abortion before many know they’re pregnant, and allows Georgians to once again access abortion care in the state beyond the earliest weeks of pregnancy.     

“Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote,” said Judge Robert McBurney, writing for the majority. “Forcing a woman to carry an unwanted, not-yet-viable fetus to term violates her constitutional rights to liberty and privacy.”  

In its ruling, the court held that:

  • The state constitution’s strong protection of the fundamental right to privacy prohibits political interference with an individual’s abortion decision before viability.
  • The exclusion of mental health from the ban’s narrow medical emergency exception violates equal protection.
  • Another provision of the law giving district attorneys broad access to the medical records of abortion patients also violates Georgians’ right to privacy.

Judge McBurney also wrote:

  • “[F]or many women, their pregnancy was unintended, unexpected, and often unknown until well after the embryonic heartbeat began.  Yet that’s too late under the LIFE Act’s strictures: these women are now forbidden from undoing that life-altering change of circumstances — before they even knew the change had occurred. For these women, the liberty of privacy means that they alone should choose whether they serve as human incubators for the five months leading up to viability.”
  • “Considering the compelling record evidence about the physical, mental, and emotional impact of unwanted pregnancies on the women who are forced by law to carry them to term (as well as on their other living children), the Court finds that, until the pregnancy is viable, a woman’s right to make decisions about her body and her health remains private and protected, i.e., remains her business and her business alone.”
  • “[T[here is an uncomfortable and usually unspoken subtext of involuntary servitude swirling about this debate, symbolically illustrated by the composition of the legal teams in this case. It is generally men who promote and defend laws like the LIFE Act, the effect of which is to require only women — and, given the socio-economic and demographic evidence presented at trial, primarily poor women, which means in Georgia primarily black and brown women — to engage in compulsory labor, i.e., the carrying of a pregnancy to term at the Government’s behest.” 

Read Judge McBurney’s full opinion here.

Georgia Supreme Court Reinstates Ban Pending Appeal

Georgia’s Attorney General filed an appeal of the ruling on October 2, asking the Georgia Supreme Court to reinstate the ban. On October 7, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled to reinstate the six-week ban while the case proceeds at the Court. The Supreme Court left in place for now the trial court’s ruling blocking a separate provision of the law giving state prosecutors broad access to the medical records of abortion patients absent any due process protections (like notice to the patient or a subpoena). This part of the ruling is unrelated to the ban itself.

Since going into effect, H.B. 481 has denied Georgians the freedom to make personal medical decisions during pregnancy and forced patients into life-threatening situations. Last month, Georgia’s expert Maternal Mortality Review Committee determined that the deaths of two Black women in 2022 — Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller — were “preventable” but that the patients were not able to access the urgent medical care they needed due to confusion and fear of criminal penalties for violating the state’s abortion ban.

“Today, the Georgia Supreme Court sided with anti-abortion extremists. Every minute this harmful six-week abortion ban is in place, Georgians suffer. Denying our community members the lifesaving care they deserve jeopardizes their lives, safety, and health—all for the sake of power and control over our bodies,” said Monica Simpson, executive director of plaintiff SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective about the Court’s ruling.

Georgians directly harmed by the six-week ban shared their stories in an amicus brief submitted to the Court in January.

On February 20, 2025, the Georgia Supreme Court vacated the district court’s ruling and remanded the case to the district court for reconsideration of the plaintiffs’ standing to bring their claims.

Center Attorneys: Alice Wang and Cici Coquillette 

Co-Counsel/Cooperating Attorneys: Caplan Cobb LLC, Bondurant Mixson & Elmore LLP, ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project, ACLU of Georgia, and Planned Parenthood Federation of America 

Plaintiffs: SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective, Feminist Women’s Health Center, Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc., Atlanta Comprehensive Wellness Clinic, Atlanta Women’s Medical Center, FemHealth USA d/b/a carafem, Summit Medical Associates, P.C., Carrie Cwiak, M.D., M.P.H., Lisa Haddad, M.D., M.S., M.P.H., Eva Lathrop, M.D., M.P.H., and Medical Students for Choice 

Timeline:

July 20, 2022 After the U.S. Supreme Court takes away the right to abortion, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals lifts the federal district court’s injunction against H.B. 481, Georgia’s six-week abortion ban. The ban goes into effect for the first time since it was passed in 2019.
July 26, 2022 The Center and its partners file a new lawsuit (SisterSong v. GA) in the Superior Court of Fulton County, which argues that H.B. 481 violates the Georgia Constitution.
August 15, 2022 The Superior Court of Fulton County refuses to preliminarily block H.B. 481, allowing the ban to remain in effect as litigation continues.
October 24, 2022 The trial challenging H.B. 481 takes place at the Superior Court of Fulton County.
November 15, 2022 Judge Robert McBurney of the Superior Court of Fulton County strikes down H.B. 481 as void and without legal basis, since it violated Roe v. Wade when it was enacted in 2019.
November 23, 2022 Georgia Supreme Court grants emergency stay of the Superior Court injunction, allowing the ban to take effect once again while the state’s appeal continues.
March 28, 2023 The Georgia Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the case.
October 24, 2023 The Georgia Supreme Court issues a ruling allowing H.B. 481 to remain in effect as the legal challenge continues.
September 30, 2024 The Superior Court of Fulton County rules the ban unconstitutional, permanently blocking it, and ruled that abortion is protected under the Georgia constitution’s fundamental right to privacy.
October 02, 2024 Georgia’s Attorney General files an appeal of this ruling, asking the Georgia State Supreme Court to reinstate the ban.
October 07, 2024 The Supreme Court of Georgia issues a ruling staying the trial court decision striking down H.B. 481. The ruling reinstates Georgia’s abortion ban while the appeal proceeds at the Georgia Supreme Court.
February 20, 2025 The Georgia Supreme Court vacates the district court’s ruling and remands the case to the district court for reconsideration of the plaintiffs’ standing to bring their claims.

Legal documents:

  • Georgia Supreme Court Ruling (Stay Order), 10.07.24
  • Ruling by Superior Court of Fulton County enjoining the ban, 09.30.24
  • Georgia Supreme Court Ruling, 10.24.23
  • Georgia Supreme Court Stay Order, 11.23.22
  • Order on Motion for Partial Judgment to Dismiss, 11.15.22
  • Order Dismissing Plaintiffs’ Preliminary Injunction Motion, 8.15.22
  • Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction Motion, 8.8.22
  • State’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction Motion, 8.4.22
  • Complaint in SisterSong v. State of Georgia, 7.26.22

Read more:

  • Georgians Directly Harmed by State’s Abortion Ban Share Their Stories in Court Filing, 02.18.25
  • Press Release: Georgia Supreme Court Reinstates Six-Week Abortion Ban, 10.07.24
  • Georgia Six-Week Abortion Ban Ruled Unconstitutional, 10.01.24
  • Press Release: Georgia Court Rules State Constitution Protects Abortion, Blocks Six-Week Ban, 09.30.24
  • Press Release: Georgia Supreme Court Allows Six-Week Abortion Ban to Remain in Effect as Legal Challenge Continues, 10.24.23
  • Press Release: Abortion Providers Urge Georgia Supreme Court to Block Six-Week Abortion Ban During Oral Arguments, 03.28.23
  • Georgia Abortion Ban Struck Down, Allowing Abortion Care Beyond Six Weeks to Resume, 11.16.22
  • Center Argues to Protect Abortion Rights Under State Constitutions, 10.18.22 
  • Press Release: Georgia State Court Denies Request to Block Six-Week Abortion Ban, 8.15.22 
Get the latest news on reproductive rights and opportunities to take action.

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Legal Protections, Legal Restrictions

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Case Status:

Open

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2024)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Better Business Bureau Charity Watch Top Rated Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up
Abortion bans cost lives.

This isn't political—it's life or death.

GIVE NOW
Abortion is Essential Rally