Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Hearing Wrap-up: Zurawski v. State of Texas

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Type:

News, Story

Case Archive

For updates on Center cases, explore our case archive here.

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

07.21.2023

In the Courts Abortion United States Story

Hearing Wrap-up: Zurawski v. State of Texas

Virginia Sobol
Texas women denied abortion care give riveting testimony while the state tries to dismiss the lawsuit.

Share

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
Senior Staff Attorney Molly Duane (at podium) and plaintiffs in the case at a press briefing after the hearing. ©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema

A two-day hearing in a Texas state court in Austin was held July 19–20 in Zurawski v. State of Texas, with riveting testimony by some of the women denied abortion care despite facing severe pregnancy complications that risked their health, fertility and lives. The Center for Reproductive Rights is representing 15 plaintiffs in the case—13 Texas women denied abortion care and two Texas obstetrician-gynecologists.

Read more about the case.

Zurawski v. State of TexasZurawski v. State of Texas link

Zurawski v. State of Texas

Case details, news, filings, and more.

At the hearing, the court heard arguments on whether to grant the plaintiffs’ request to temporarily block Texas’s abortion bans as they apply to pregnancy complications and other health conditions that may be difficult to treat during pregnancy while the case proceeds. It also heard arguments on the state’s request to dismiss the case.

Five of the plaintiffs in the case—four women denied abortions and an OB-GYN—provided testimony at the hearing, along with two experts in obstetrics and emergency medicine. After each day of the hearing, the Center held a press briefing with lawyers and plaintiffs addressing questions from the press.

“Each of these women have been through the unthinkable, and reliving that trauma in court was agonizing,” said the Center’s Senior Staff Attorney Molly Duane. “No one should have to do that, but they did it to save other Texans from the same fate. They did it to hold the state of Texas accountable for the suffering their laws are causing. Yet, instead of taking responsibility for the harm these bans have caused, the State’s attorneys egregiously belittled and shamed the women who testified.”

The state of Texas is requesting that the court dismiss the case, claiming that some of the women—whose fertility is now compromised due to being denied abortions—no longer need to worry about the bans because they are unlikely to become pregnant again, and thus have no grounds to sue. Texas also claims that the plaintiffs who are currently pregnant again can’t be certain they’ll experience complications again, and thus have no grounds to sue.

While Texas’s state laws banning abortion contain an exception for the life and health of the pregnant person, the state’s hostile abortion landscape has made physicians afraid to rely on the exception. These extreme bans criminalizing abortion have stoked fear and confusion among pregnant people and doctors throughout the state. 

Watch replays of the press briefings.

Press Briefing Wednesday, July 19Press Briefing Wednesday, July 19 link

Press Briefing Wednesday, July 19

The plaintiffs who testified at the hearing were:

  • Amanda Zurawski, lead plaintiff, who developed sepsis and nearly died after being refused an abortion when her water broke at 18 weeks. At a press briefing, Zurawski said, “I became so ill that I had to spend a week in the hospital, three days of which were in the intensive care unit. This was all because doctors weren’t allowed to give me an abortion until my life was on the line, despite the fact that there was absolutely no way my daughter would survive.”
  • Ashley Brandt, who was forced to leave the state for abortion care after one of the twins she was carrying was diagnosed with a fatal condition that reduced her other twin’s chances of survival. “It was my first time speaking publicly about the situation I experienced. During the cross examination, most of their questions were an attempt to try to shift blame on my doctors, which isn’t the case at all,” said Brandt after the hearing.
  • Samantha Casiano, who was forced to carry a nonviable pregnancy to term and give birth to a baby who died just four hours after birth. Casiano recounted how her daughter, who was diagnosed with anencephaly, suffered greatly, gasping for air before dying. “I was so sorry that I couldn’t help her or release her going to heaven sooner rather than later,” said Casiano. ” I felt so bad. She had no mercy. There was no mercy there for her, and I couldn’t do anything.”
  • Dr. Austin Dennard, an OB-GYN who herself had to travel out of state to receive abortion care for a nonviable pregnancy. “I felt like my pregnancy was not my own, that it belonged to the state because I no longer had a choice of what I could do,” said Dr. Dennard in an ABC News report. “I felt abandoned. I couldn’t believe that after spending my entire life in the state, being a sixth generation Texan, practicing medicine in the state, that the state had completely turned their back on me.”
  • Dr. Damla Karsan, a Houston-based OB-GYN who provides gynecological, prenatal and obstetric care as part of her practice. Dr. Karsan called the state’s arguments “infuriating, so dismissive and really insulting.”

Press Briefing Thursday, July 20

After the court hearing, additional plaintiffs in the case joined the press briefing, including:

  • Lauren Miller, who was forced to leave the state for abortion care after learning one of the twins she was carrying was unlikely to survive and could reduce her other twin’s chances of survival, said, “I wanted to look and to see the people who put my life at risk, put my son’s life at risk, and who nearly put my other son through a short, tortuous existence.” She added, “It’s absurd to me that my health care was denied because of this law. . . What the state of Texas said to us is that we are disposable.”
  • Elizabeth Weller, whose water broke at 19 weeks and who had to wait until she developed a life-threatening infection before obtaining an abortion, said, “It is hard for me to understand a statement of pro-life when you are literally gambling women’s lives.” She added that the state was “not pro-life—and in a sense it’s almost pro-torture. Women will die if they haven’t already.”
  • Taylor Edwards, who had to travel out of state for abortion care after her baby was diagnosed with a fatal condition, described the state’s language at the hearing as “another gut punch” and said it was “meant to scare women.” “It felt like my state truly didn’t care,” she added.
Media Coverage of the HearingMedia Coverage of the Hearing link

Media Coverage of the Hearing

View media highlights about the riveting testimony given at the hearing.

“The differences in the parties’ positions boil down to this: The state wants to err on the side of preventing more abortions even if it harms women and their families, while the plaintiffs want to err on the side of protecting the lives, health and future fertility of all Texans,” said Duane. “This is the bare minimum that Texans are entitled to under the law.”

Zurawski v. State of Texas is the first lawsuit brought on behalf of women denied abortions since the U.S. Supreme Court eliminated the constitutional right to abortion in June 2022 and cleared the way for states to ban it entirely.

A ruling in the hearing is expected in several weeks.

View photos of the press briefings:

(L-R) Plaintiffs Dr. Damla Karsan, Taylor Edwards, Samantha Casiano, Elizabeth Weller, Amanda Zurawski and Dr. Austin Dennard stand together outside the courthouse. —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
“Abortion is and has always been a standard and critical part of maternal health care,” the Center’s Senior Staff Attorney Molly Duane told reporters. —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
“What the state of Texas said to us is that we are disposable,” said plaintiff Lauren Miller. —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
“The women standing behind me have endured the unthinkable: Amanda nearly died and Samantha watched her baby die, both at the hands of the state,” said Senior Staff Attorney Molly Duane (at podium). —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
“I don’t feel safe to have children in Texas anymore,” said plaintiff Ashley Brandt. —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
“[My doctor] told me that I didn’t have any options because there was a law,” said plaintiff Samantha Casiano. “I felt like I was abandoned.” —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
Plaintiff Elizabeth Weller accused Texas of gambling with women’s lives. “It’s not pro-life—and in a sense, it’s almost pro-torture.” —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
The Center’s Senior Counsel Marc Hearron reiterated the organization’s commitment to fight on behalf of women across the country being denied basic health care. —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
Plaintiff Taylor Edwards said she was told by her doctor, “‘My hands are completely tied. I can do nothing because you are not actively dying and your baby has a heartbeat.'” —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
(L-R) The plaintiffs’ legal team—Austin Kaplan, Nicolas Kabat, Alexander Lawrence, Astrid Ackerman, Claire Abrahamson, Molly Duane, Rehan Chaudhuri, Marc Hearron and Jamie Levitt—outside the court. —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
“How many pregnant women and people must end up on death’s door or be forced to leave the state before something is done?” said Senior Staff Attorney Molly Duane. —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
“These are fundamental human rights we are talking about, vital to our lives, freedom, health and safety. We need to get them back,” said lead plaintiff Amanda Zurawski. —©Center for Reproductive Rights / SPLASHCinema
About the PlaintiffsAbout the Plaintiffs link

About the Plaintiffs

More about the Texas women and physicians who are plaintiffs in the case.

Watch highlights of the press briefings:

We❤️our lawyers! pic.twitter.com/sTsMr105qd

— Center for Reproductive Rights (@ReproRights) July 21, 2023

The lived experience of the plaintiffs in Zurawski v. State of Texas highlights the real-life consequences of extreme abortion bans. Abortion care is essential. Period. pic.twitter.com/i7MFYb1Bbe

— Center for Reproductive Rights (@ReproRights) July 20, 2023
View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Center for Reproductive Rights (@reprorights)

Tags: Texas, Texas abortion ban, texas exceptions case, Zurawski v. Texas, Texas abortion exception, Zurawski v. State of Texas, texas emergency exceptions, texas women denied abortions, Amanda Zurawski, Texas abortion bans

Related Posts

Center and Partners File Lawsuit to Block Texas Abortion Ban

The Center for Reproductive Rights and its partners today filed a lawsuit to block an extreme Texas law that bans...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts
Center and Partners File Lawsuit to Block Texas Abortion Ban

Center Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Block Texas Law That Would Prohibit Almost All Abortion Care in the State

The Center and its partners today filed an emergency request with the U.S. Supreme Court to block Texas's radical new abortion ban before it takes effect September 1.

Abortion,United States,In the Courts
Center Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Block Texas Law That Would Prohibit Almost All Abortion Care in the State

Whole Woman’s Health v. Paxton: Ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

This ruling upheld a Texas ban on the standard procedure for abortion care after about 14-15 weeks. Read the full...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2024)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Better Business Bureau Charity Watch Top Rated Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up