Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Center and Partners Sue Oklahoma Over Abortion Bans That Would Further Devastate Access in the Region

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Legal Restrictions

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Type:

News, Story

Case Archive

For updates on Center cases, explore our case archive here.

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

04.28.2022

In the Courts Abortion United States Story

Center and Partners Sue Oklahoma Over Abortion Bans That Would Further Devastate Access in the Region

Virginia Sobol
One measure would make abortion a felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison and/or an extreme fine, and the other copycats Texas’s vigilante abortion ban.

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
©Natalia Bratslavsky/Fotolia/Adobe Stock

Since Texas’s abortion ban and vigilante scheme banned most abortions in the state, people have rushed to neighboring states—including Oklahoma—to seek abortion care. Now Oklahoma has passed its own extreme abortion bans, which would further devastate abortion access in the region.

One law, S.B. 612, passed earlier this month and due to take effect in August, bans all abortion care except in narrowly defined medical emergencies and makes abortion a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and/or a $100,000 fine. The other law, S.B. 1503, passed today by the legislature and effective immediately once signed by the governor, copycats Texas’s vigilante law banning abortion at approximately six weeks of pregnancy.

Today, the Center for Reproductive Rights and its partners filed two challenges in Oklahoma state courts to block the bans from taking effect.

Will the South become an abortion desert?

What if Roe fell? U.S. Abortion Laws MapWhat if Roe fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map link

What if Roe fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map

If the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, 24 states are poised to ban abortion.

“The Oklahoma Supreme Court has repeatedly found that the state legislature’s extreme attempts to restrict abortion are unconstitutional, and these bans are some of the most extreme yet,” said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center. “We are asking the state courts to uphold the state constitution and apply Oklahoma precedent to block these insidious abortion bans before they take effect. Oklahoma is a critical state for abortion access right now, with many Texans fleeing to Oklahoma for abortion care. These bans would further decimate abortion access across the South.”

Today’s challenges are:

  • S.B. 612, the total abortion ban, filed in Oklahoma County District Court. This challenge seeks to add S.B. 612 to an existing Center case, Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. O’Connor, which was filed in state court last year against five laws banning and restricting abortion. Those included a ban on abortion at approximately six weeks of pregnancy; a law banning abortion entirely by declaring its provision “unprofessional conduct,” which would result in the physician’s loss of licensure; severe restrictions on medication abortion; and a provider restriction. All five of those laws were successfully blocked as the case proceeds.
  • S.B. 1503, the Texas-style vigilante abortion ban, filed directly in the Oklahoma Supreme Court. This challenge seeks an emergency order blocking the law from taking effect while the case proceeds. Although federal challenges to Texas’s ban have failed to block that law, there is significant precedent in Oklahoma state court to support plaintiffs’ arguments to block the law.

Following Texas’s Ban, Oklahoma Bans Would Expand the Abortion Desert in the Region

Since September 2021, most abortion access has ended in Texas due to the state’s law, S.B. 8, which bans abortion care after approximately six weeks of pregnancy and incentivizes private individuals to bring costly and harassing lawsuits against anyone who provides care or helps someone obtain an abortion in violation of the law. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to block the Texas law in a case brought by the Center.

Read more.

Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. O’Connor

Last year in this case, Oklahoma state courts blocked five abortion bans and restrictions.

Patients in Texas are being turned away in droves, prevented from accessing time-sensitive abortion care and forced to travel hundreds of miles to other states—such as neighboring Oklahoma—to access care. Those who can’t afford to travel are being forced to carry pregnancies against their will. As with other abortion bans, those facing obstacles to accessing care—such as people living on low incomes, Black and brown communities, young people and people in rural areas—are disproportionately impacted by Texas’s ban.

“As a physician who also provides abortions in Texas, I have seen firsthand the impact of a bounty-hunting scheme and abortion ban on patients and physicians,” said Dr. Alan Braid, owner of Tulsa Women’s Reproductive Clinic and a plaintiff in both cases. “They are designed to threaten and intimidate physicians into not providing constitutionally protected health care, and force pregnant people to travel hundreds of miles to receive care. The pain this has caused in Texas is unfathomable, and I will fight alongside these other providers and advocates to prevent these laws from taking effect in Oklahoma.”

Desperately Seeking Care: Six Months of Texas’s Extreme Abortion Ban

How Texas’s vigilante abortion ban is harming people seeking abortion care in the state and beyond.

Oklahoma clinics have reported huge upticks in Texas patients, resulting in weeks-long wait times. Planned Parenthood released data in February showing that, in the first four months after S.B. 8 took effect, more than half of the patients at its Oklahoma health centers were from Texas, compared to less than 10% in the prior year. Overall, during that period, these Oklahoma health centers saw a nearly 2500% increase in Texas patients.

If the bans challenged today take effect, abortion access could be almost entirely cut off for the thousands of patients—both in and out of state—who receive abortion care in Oklahoma each year, further devastating abortion access in the region.

The Oklahoma state legislature has also considered a number of other abortion restrictions this year, including a ban on abortion 30 days after a person’s last menstrual period; a constitutional amendment that, if approved by voters, would eliminate any right to abortion in the state constitution; and a modification of the state’s trigger ban, which passed earlier this week.

“Access to abortion is in great peril in the country, and especially in this region,” said Rabia Muqaddam, senior staff attorney at the Center. “These bans are blatantly unconstitutional and threaten the health and freedom of Oklahomans, Texans, and so many others. We must prevent Oklahoma from following Texas in becoming an expanded abortion desert and we’ll continue to fight these extreme laws.”

Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. O’Connor (the case to which today’s challenge to S.B. 612 was added) was filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Dechert LLP, and Blake Patton on behalf of the Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice, Tulsa Women’s Reproductive Clinic, Dr. Alan Braid, Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, and Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma.

Today’s challenge to S.B. 1503 was filed in Oklahoma Supreme Court against the State of Oklahoma and all 77 state court clerks. The same group of plaintiffs are named in this challenge represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and Blake Patton.

Read more:

  • S.B. 612, Oklahoma’s total abortion ban, and the lawsuit filed in Oklahoma County District Court
  • S.B. 1503, Oklahoma’sTexas-style vigilante abortion ban, and the lawsuit filed directly in the Oklahoma Supreme Court

Tags: oklahoma, oklahoma abortion banoklahoma lawsuit

Related Posts

Oklahoma Supreme Court Order Granting TI

The Oklahoma state Supreme Court blocked three extreme abortion restrictions that were set to take effect November 1. The ruling on October...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Oklahoma Supreme Court Blocks New Abortion Restrictions

10.25.2021 – (PRESS RELEASE) Today, the Oklahoma state Supreme Court blocked three extreme abortion restrictions that were scheduled to take...

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts
Oklahoma Supreme Court Blocks New Abortion Restrictions

OK S.B. 1503 Claim

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2023)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up