Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Desperately Seeking Care: Six Months of Texas’s Extreme Abortion Ban

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Legal Restrictions

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts, Reporting on Rights

Type:

News, Story

Case Archive

For updates on this case and others, explore our case archive here.

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

03.01.2022

In the Courts Abortion United States Story

Desperately Seeking Care: Six Months of Texas’s Extreme Abortion Ban

Virginia Sobol
Panic and chaos as patients are turned away in droves.

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
Eric Kayne/AP Images for the Center for Reproductive Rights

Today marks six months since Texas’s extreme abortion ban and vigilante scheme took effect–and it is causing panic, chaos and harm for patients seeking abortion care in Texas and beyond. 

The law, S.B. 8, bans abortion care after approximately six weeks of pregnancy and incentivizes private individuals to bring costly and harassing lawsuits against anyone who provides care or helps someone get care in the state. The Center for Reproductive Rights has been challenging the law in its case, Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson.

S.B. 8 has ended most abortion access in the state, rendering the constitutional right to abortion effectively meaningless.  Patients in Texas are being turned away in droves, prevented from accessing time-sensitive abortion care, and forced to travel hundreds of miles to other states to access care. Those who can’t afford to travel are being forced to carry pregnancies against their will. Those facing obstacles to accessing care–such as people living on low incomes, Black and brown communities, young people and people in rural areas–are disproportionately impacted by the Texas ban. 

The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly refused to block this blatantly unconstitutional law, allowing Texas to deprive its residents of the right to abortion since September 1 and betraying “not only the citizens of Texas, but also our constitutional system of government,” according to Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her dissent in Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson. 

“The Supreme Court has effectively endorsed Texas’s efforts to subvert the U.S. Constitution and has left us no path in this case to block the filing of vigilante lawsuits,” said Molly Duane, Senior Staff Attorney at the Center. “With the case now before the Texas Supreme Court, the best we can hope for is to prevent state licensing boards from enforcing the law.”

Other anti-abortion lawmakers are taking note of Texas’s “vigilante” strategy that has allowed its unconstitutional abortion ban to evade judicial review and stay in effect: Copycat abortion bans mimicking S.B. 8 have been introduced in 10 states, with more likely to come.

Read more about the Center’s case challenging the Texas abortion ban.

Whole Woman’s Health v. JacksonWhole Woman’s Health v. Jackson link

Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson

Texas Patients Seeking Care Are Overwhelming Clinics in Other States

Without access to abortion care in the state after six weeks of pregnancy, Texas patients who are able to travel are seeking care not only in neighboring states, but in states beyond. This has wreaked havoc on clinics in other states struggling to absorb the huge influx of Texas patients and resulted in long wait times and delays in care for all patients.

Here are some experiences being reported in Texas and other states: 

  • In a press conference on February 25, Fund Texas Choice, which helps fund Texans’ travel for abortion care, reported that call volume had increased fivefold and the average round trip for a Texas patient seeking abortion rose over 40%, from 807 miles before the law took effect to 1160 miles currently.
  • In January 2022, an AP article mentioned that Texas abortion providers reported that they were serving just one-third of their typical number of patients since the law took effect. 
  • At Whole Woman’s Health in Austin, a provider saw a 90% decrease in the number of abortions he performed the month after the law took effect.
  • Planned Parenthood Federation of America recently reported data showing the “devastating impact” of S.B. 8. The data, collected from September 1 to December 31, 2021, from its health centers, showed: 
    • Centers in Oklahoma, New Mexico, Kansas, Colorado, and Missouri saw a nearly 800% increase of patients from Texas when compared to September to December 2020.
    • Centers in Oklahoma saw a nearly 2500% increase in abortion patients with Texas zip codes compared to the previous year, and Texas patients made up more than half of the total number of abortion patients in Oklahoma compared to less than 10% from September to December 2020.
    • In Colorado, centers reported a more than 1000%increase in abortion patients with Texas zip codes and in New Mexico, a more than 100% increase, compared to the previous year.
  • Data from the Guttmacher Institute indicated that Texas residents have accessed abortion care in at least 12 states that do not border Texas –including states that are hundreds, and even thousands, of miles from the Texas border, such as Illinois, Washington, Ohio and Maryland.
  • The clinic administrator of Hope Medical Group in Louisiana stated at the February 25 press conference that the number of its Texas patients increased from 18% before S.B. 8 to more than 60% by year end, resulting in long wait times for appointment availability and making it difficult to serve all the patients who need care.  

Texas’s Chaos Offers a Preview if the Supreme Court Overturns Roe v. Wade

The Supreme Court’s repeated refusal to block S.B. 8 and its disregard for patients in Texas are deeply alarming signs for the future of Roe and abortion access nationwide. What is happening in Texas should be a grave warning for the rest of the country, since the chaos in Texas is a preview of what would happen on a much larger scale if Roe falls. 

Before the end of its term in June, the Court will decide the Center’s case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, challenging a Mississippi abortion ban. In the case, the state of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn Roe and almost 50 years of precedent and find there is no constitutional right to abortion. If Roe falls, almost half the U.S. states are poised to ban abortion entirely, leaving no access to abortion care across the Midwest and the South.

Yesterday, the U.S. Senate voted on the Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA) in the first-ever Senate vote on proactive federal legislation to enshrine the right to abortion in federal law. The bill—which is supported by a majority of voters in the U.S. and was passed in the House in September—did not receive the 60 votes needed to overcome the filibuster. The effort to advance this bill in Congress will continue, led by a a coalition of more than 100 organizations, including the Center.

Read more:

  • “Doctors’ worst fears about the Texas abortion law are coming true,” NPR, 03.01.22
  • Texas abortion ban case: Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson 
  • Mississippi abortion ban case: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
  • “What if Roe fell?” interactive tool

Tags: S.B. 8, Texas abortion ban, Texas abortion law

Related Posts

Center and Partners File Lawsuit to Block Texas Abortion Ban

The Center for Reproductive Rights and its partners today filed a lawsuit to block an extreme Texas law that bans...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts
Center and Partners File Lawsuit to Block Texas Abortion Ban

Center Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Block Texas Law That Would Prohibit Almost All Abortion Care in the State

The Center and its partners today filed an emergency request with the U.S. Supreme Court to block Texas's radical new abortion ban before it takes effect September 1.

Abortion,United States,In the Courts
Center Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Block Texas Law That Would Prohibit Almost All Abortion Care in the State

Whole Woman’s Health v. Paxton: Ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

This ruling upheld a Texas ban on the standard procedure for abortion care after about 14-15 weeks. Read the full...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2022)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up