Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Amicus Work: Latin America and the Caribbean

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Regions:

Latin America & Caribbean, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Peru

Type:

Case Document

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

10.18.2021

Latin America & Caribbean Case Document

Amicus Work: Latin America and the Caribbean

Megan Diamondstein
Highlights of amicus briefs and third-party interventions submitted by the Center on cases in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Share

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id

Latin America and the Caribbean

Case of Britez Arce et. al. v. Argentina

Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2022)

Issue: Obstetric violence in Latin America and the Caribbean

Center Position: Obstetric violence is a form of gender-based violence.

This case concerned a pregnant Argentinian woman, Cristina Britez Arce, whose death resulted from inadequate medical treatment. The Center filed an amicus brief in the case requesting that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights adopt standards concerning the definition of obstetric violence and States’ duties in cases when obstetric violence occurs. Most of the Center’s recommendations were adopted in its ruling, which marked the first time the Court applied the concept of obstetric violence. The Court also ordered restitution for Britez Arce’s family and declared Argentina responsible for violating her rights to life, humane treatment and health, and the rights of her son and daughter to humane treatment, a fair trial, family protection, children’s rights and judicial protection. Read more about the ruling and its impact here.

Case of I.V. v. Bolivia 

Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2016)

Issue: Bolivia’s policy of forced sterilization 

Center Position: Forced sterilization is a human rights violation.

I.V., a Bolivian, sued Bolivia when she was sterilized without her consent after giving birth. The doctor unilaterally decided that it was best for her health if she did not get pregnant again. The Center’s brief argued that forced sterilization is a breach of human rights that has a disproportionate impact on women, especially those who are ethnic minorities or belong to other vulnerable groups, and that states must adopt measures to assure that women, especially those in vulnerable circumstances, are able to provide informed consent, free from discrimination. The Court determined that Bolivia was responsible for breaching I.V.’s rights to personal integrity, private life, personal liberty, access to information, and her freedom to start a family. 

Case of Gretel Artavia Murillo (FIV) v. Costa Rica

Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2012)

Issue: Whether a state can ban in vitro fertilization (IVF) as a means to protect life prior to birth

Center Position: Costa Rica’s IVF ban violates international law. 

This case concerned whether States may extend the right to life to the moment of fertilization and therefore consider an unimplanted embryo to be a born human being for all legal purposes. The Center’s brief argued that under international law, life is not protected from the moment of fertilization.  Further, the brief argues that as a reproductive health service, IVF must be provided by the State to fulfill human rights like the right to equality and the right to family, as well as fundamental freedoms such as the right to privacy..

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights deemed Costa Rica’s ban on IVF discriminatory, given that it denied the petitioners the possibility of having children in spite of their disability (infertility). It further determined that protections for the right to life prior to birth cannot be absolute and must be gradual and incremental, in accordance with life’s development.  

Case 12.361: Ana Victoria Sánchez Villalobos y otros v. Costa Rica 

Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (2010)

Two amicus briefs were filed by the Center in this case: 

  • Brief 1
  • Brief 2

Issue: In Vitro Fertilization Ban in Costa Rica.

Center Position: Costa Rica’s in vitro fertilization (IVF) ban, and the regulations proposed towards continuing that ban, breached international human rights law.

The case concerned the prohibition of IVF in Costa Rica due to a 2000 decision from the Constitutional Chamber of its Supreme Court which restricted access to that technique. This case was later decided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 

Draft of the Organic Law Reforming the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code

Constitutional Tribunal of Ecuador (2019)

Issue: Restrictions on access to abortion in cases of rape.

Center Position: Victims of rape must have legal access to abortion.

The Proposed Bill for the amendment of the Integral Criminal Organic Code in Ecuador established that abortion would be illegal and criminalized in cases where it is sought as a consequence of sexual violence. The Center’s brief provided context on Ecuador’s pervasive rates of sexual violence and the consequences of the criminalization of abortion in cases of rape for the health of women and girls. It also argued that international standards obligate States to guarantee access to abortion services when the pregnancy is the result of sexual violence. 

Criminal Proceeding Against Evelyn Beatriz Hernández Cruz, Referencia Judicial 23-U2-19

Sentencing Tribunal of Cojutepeque, El Salvador (2019)

Issue:  Criminal proceeding against Evelyn Hernandez, a woman criminalized for having suffered an obstetric emergency.

Center Position: Support for Evelyn Hernandez’s innocence.

After suffering an obstetric emergency, Evelyn Hernández was prosecuted and criminalized for having perpetrated the crime of homicide (for allegedly causing the death of the fetus). The Center requested the local court to take into consideration Evelyn’s individual circumstances of vulnerability, and required the Court to analyze the case with a gender perspective. 

Rol Nº:5572-18-CDS/5650-18-CDS

Constitutional Court of Chile (2018)

Issue:  Conscientious objection to providing legal abortion in Chile

Center Position: Supports the Regulations on Conscientious Objection in Chile established in its Health Code that prohibited private health institutions from conscientiously objecting to abortion services.

Article 119 Ter of the Health Code in Chile provided that private health institutions could not conscientiously object to abortion services when they provided obstetric healthcare. The case challenged the constitutionality of that law.  The Center, arguing that health is a human right that should be protected under international law, supported Chile’s regulations.

Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy in Three Circumstances

Constitutional Court of Chile (2017)

Issue: Whether permitting abortion in limited circumstances aligned with the Chilean Constitution 

Center Position: Support of a proposed bill that allowed access to legal abortion under three circumstances.

The Chilean Constitutional Court was examining, in accordance with its constitutional legislation, a proposed bill–already approved by the National Congress–that allowed legal access to abortion in three circumstances: where the pregnancy represents a danger to the life of the woman,  in cases of rape and incest, and in cases of fetal impairment incompatible with extrauterine life.

Process of Amparo of Violeta Cristina Gómez Hinostroza

Constitutional Court of Lima, Peru (2014); Juzgado Constitucional de Lima, Perú (2014) 

Issue:  Access to emergency contraception   

Center Position: Emergency contraception does not constitute a breach of the right to life and its prohibition constitutes a breach of international human rights law.

The case concerns an amparo procedure concerning access to emergency contraception. The procedure is within a context under which the Constitutional Court from Peru issued a decision prohibiting access to emergency contraception because it understood it was against the right to life. The Center argued that prohibiting emergency contraception violated international law.

Decision C- 355/2006

Constitutional Court of Colombia (2005)

Issue:  Access to abortion in Colombia

Center Position: Supports that the Constitutional Court allows for access to abortion, at a minimum, (1) when there is a threat to the life or health of the pregnant woman; (2) serious fetal impairments; and (3) pregnancy results from rape.

This landmark case overturned the absolute ban of abortion in Colombia and determined that abortion must be permitted, at a minimum, in three instances: where pregnancy poses a risk to the woman’s life or health, in cases of fetal impairment, and when pregnancy results from rape. 

Fundamental Precept N. 442. 

Federal Supreme Court of Brazil (2019); Supremo Tribunal Federal do Brazil (2019)

Issue: Legality of abortion in Brazil

Center Position: Supports that the Supreme Federal Tribunal (STF) overturn Brazil’s restrictive abortion law. 

The STF has the opportunity to remove obstacles to abortion in Brazil, including by determining whether articles 124 and 126 of the Criminal Code, which criminalize abortion, are permissible. 

Related Posts

Decision: L.C. v. Peru

In a groundbreaking decision issued in L.C. v. Peru—a case brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights and its partner organization...

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,Latin America & Caribbean, Peru, Accountability Bodies, United Nations,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, Around the World, Reporting on Rights

Decision: Alyne da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil

In the first maternal death case to be decided by an international human rights body, the United Nations Committee on...

Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care, Maternal Mortality,Latin America & Caribbean, Brazil,In the Courts, At the United Nations

K.L. v. Peru: Final Decision

K.L. v. Peru: Final Decision Subject Matter: Refusal to provide medical services to the author in connection with a therapeutic...

Abortion,Latin America & Caribbean, Peru,In the Courts

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2024)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Better Business Bureau Charity Watch Top Rated Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up