Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

In Ruling by Inter-American Court of Human Rights, New Legal Protections for Pregnant Women

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care

Regions:

Latin America & Caribbean, Argentina, Accountability Bodies, Inter-American Human Rights System

Work:

In the Courts

Type:

News, Story

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

02.02.2023

In the Courts Maternal Health Latin America & Caribbean Story

In Ruling by Inter-American Court of Human Rights, New Legal Protections for Pregnant Women

Nat Ray
In case involving the death of a pregnant woman in Argentina, Court requires states across Latin America to adopt policies to prevent obstetric violence.

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, San José, Costa Rica

A recent ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights will set new standards to protect women and other pregnant people—during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum—from obstetric violence across Latin America and the Caribbean. The ruling came in a case involving a pregnant Argentinian woman whose death resulted from inadequate medical treatment.

The ruling, in Britez Arce et. al. v. Argentina, marks the first time the Court applied the concept of obstetric violence.

“Women have the right to live a life free of obstetric violence and States have the obligation to prevent it, punish it and refrain from practicing it, as well as to ensure that their agents act accordingly,” specifies the Court’s ruling. The ruling, dated November 16 and announced by the Court January 18, also states that “States have the obligation to provide adequate, specialized and differentiated health services during pregnancy, childbirth and within a reasonable period after childbirth, to guarantee the mother’s right to health and prevent maternal mortality and morbidity” under international law. 

Specifically, the ruling recognizes obstetric violence as a form of gender-based violence under the Belem do Para Convention in the Americas—a legally binding international treaty criminalizing all forms of violence against women, including sexual violence—and requires member States to adopt policies to ensure that these forms of violence do not occur. 

The Center for Reproductive Rights filed an amicus brief in the case—the only party to do so—requesting that the Court adopt standards concerning the definition of obstetric violence and States’ duties in cases when obstetric violence occurs. The Court adopted most of the Center’s recommendations in its ruling. 

“This case is significant: for the first time in its contentious jurisdiction, the Court has recognized obstetric violence as a concept of international law and as a form of violence against women. With this ruling, the Court sets new standards that will benefit pregnant women and other pregnant people across the entire region,” said Maria Fernanda Vanegas, the Center’s director of advocacy and external relations. “The court’s ruling clearly aligns with one of the Center’s strategic objectives: to build stronger legal protections for maternal health.” 

What does “contentious jurisdiction” mean?

Contentious jurisdiction refers to jurisdiction of a court to deal with matters in controversy between parties.

For instance, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has a contentious jurisdiction to deal with matters regarding the international responsability of a State party to the American Convention. This Court has also a consulting mandate to advise States in the interpretation of the American Convention and other Inter-American instruments of human rights.

Court Finds Argentina Responsible for the Death of Cristina Britez Arce 

During her pregnancy, Cristina Britez Arce presented several risk factors that were not adequately addressed by the health system and that ultimately led to her death.

In June 1992, when she was more than 40 weeks pregnant, she went to the Ramón Sardá Public Hospital in Buenos Aires, where an ultrasound was performed that indicated that the fetus had died. She was immediately hospitalized to undergo an induced labor. However, the risk factors of her pregnancy and various previous health conditions that she presented were not adequately taken into consideration. She was subjected to great suffering and distress and died due to “non-traumatic cardiorespiratory arrest” at age 38.

In its ruling, the Court ordered restitution for Britez Arce’s family and declared Argentina responsible for violating her rights to life, humane treatment and health, and the rights of her son and daughter to humane treatment, a fair trial, family protection, children’s rights and judicial protection. Argentina was also ordered to carry out awareness campaigns towards preventing obstetric violence and to train health providers to promote dignified treatment for pregnant persons. 

inter-american court of human rights sign

About the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights is the highest judicial body for human rights in the Americas.

Based on the American Convention on Human Rights, the Court’s rulings are understood as binding to all member States under its jurisdiction.

Learn more here.

Court’s Ruling Has Far-Reaching Impact Across the Region 

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights is the highest judicial body for human rights in the Americas, and the standards set by its ruling will benefit millions of pregnant people throughout the entire region.   

Based on the American Convention on Human Rights, the Court’s rulings are understood as binding to all States under its jurisdiction—including highly populated countries such as Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina, and many others throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. The rulings have been traditionally used as a binding interpretation by the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights when deciding on cases and elaborating reports on the whole Americas region, under the Organization of American States (OAS) charter. 

In its ruling in Britez Arce et. al. v. Argentina, the Court also provided its definition of obstetric violence: “The Court finds that obstetric violence is a form of gender-based violence (…), exercised by health care providers against pregnant women, during access to health services that take place during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum, which is expressed mostly, but not exclusively, in a dehumanizing, disrespectful, abusive or negligent treatment of pregnant women; in the denial of treatment and full information on the state of health and applicable treatments; in forced or coerced medical interventions; and in the tendency to pathologize natural reproductive processes, among other threatening manifestations in the context of health care during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum.” 

Read more.

  • Press release from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (available in English, Spanish and Portuguese), 01.18.23 
  • Ruling by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in Britez Arce et. al. v. Argentina (Spanish), 11.16.22
  • Amicus brief filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights (Spanish), 06.03.22

Tags: Human rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, gender-based violence, latin america, britez arce et al v. argentina, obstetric violence, international law

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2022)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up