Latest News
Tucson Women’s Clinic v. Eden: Complaint
Arizona This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the United States Constitution challenging: (a) Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 36-402, 36-449, 36- 449.01, 36-449.02, 36-449.03 and 36-2301.02, as revised by Arizona House Bill [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Steven Galson Decision Part 2
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Steven Galson Decision Part 1
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Janet Woodcock Deposition Part 2
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Janet Woodcock Deposition Part 1
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Lester Crawford Deposition
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: John Jenkins Deposition
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Susan Wood Deposition
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Reproductive rights are human rights.
Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Complaint
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINTPlaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, bring this complaint against the defendant, his agents and successors in office, and [...]
Choice, Inc. v. Graham: Motion for Preliminary Injunction
PRELIMINARY STATEMENTLouisianaPlaintiffs seek immediate injunctive relief against Defendant William A. Graham's ("Graham") unlawful and irreparably harmful practice of infringing Plaintiff Choice, Inc. of Texas d/b/a Causeway Medical Clinic’s (“Causeway”) trademarks CAUSEWAY MEDICAL CLINIC and CAUSEWAY, [...]
Choice, Inc. v. Graham: First Amended Complaint
Introduction 1. This is an action for trademark infringement, dilution, false advertising, unfair competition, intentional infliction of emotional distress, fraud, detrimental reliance, breach of duty, and tortious interference with business relations, arising out of actions [...]
In the Matter of the Grand Jury Investigation: Amended Memorandum in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus
In the Matter of the Grand Jury Investigation: Amended Memorandum in Support of Petition for Writ of MandamusKansas
Reproductive rights are human rights.
Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.
