Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Guardian: Philippines needs resolute political support on reproductive health

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare, Public Funding

Regions:

Asia, Philippines

Work:

Engaging Policymakers, Around the World

Type:

Center in the Spotlight

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

03.19.2013

Engaging Policymakers Contraception Asia Center in the Spotlight

Guardian: Philippines needs resolute political support on reproductive health

Justin Goldberg

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
A First Step Forward in the Philippines
By Melissa Upreti, Regional director for Asia, Center for Reproductive Rights
reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/crr_FS_Guardian_Philippines.jpg

Women in the Philippines have lacked autonomy over their bodies for decades. The overwhelming political power of the country’s Catholic church leaders – and the government’s acquiescence to many of their demands – has resulted in reproductive healthcare restrictions so severe they amount to human rights violations. We hope this is beginning to change at last. The Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012, signed into law by President Benigno Aquino in December and in the process of implementation, has the potential to bring modern contraception to all Filipina women, and with it hope that thousands of maternal deaths will be prevented, and families and communities will rise out of devastating poverty. But this critical step in expanding access to reproductive healthcare will only be as effective as the government behind it is resolute. The door to one crucial element of that care has now opened wider, with President Aquino having signed the implementing rules and regulations last Friday, setting the act into motion. The new law guarantees universal and free access to nearly all modern contraceptives for all citizens – most importantly the nation’s poorest people – through government health centres. Previous governments have prioritised so-called “natural family planning” while restricting funding for modern contraceptives. The act also mandates reproductive health education in state schools and recognises a woman’s right to post-abortion care as part of the right to reproductive healthcare. The law represents significant progress, but it is far from ideal. It fails to legalise all contraceptives, sanctions ideological bias in hospitals and reinforces the legal status of human embryos. These concessions have clearly been made in deference to the Catholic hierarchy – and are cause for great concern about the Philippines’ ability to sustain and expand the advances it is now poised to make on reproductive health. Under the law, emergency contraception will remain illegal. Scientific studies have proven pregnancy begins only after a fertilised egg implants in the uterus, and emergency contraceptives simply prevent that from happening. Yet the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines ignores the science, calling emergency contraceptives “abortion pills”. This blatant distortion keeps emergency contraception illegal and out of reach for millions, with dire consequences. The continued ban on emergency contraception in the Philippines will perpetuate, in part, one of the world’s worst human rights records on protecting women’s health. The government’s hostile view on modern contraception has – until now – contributed to 800,000 unintended births annually. But not all women continue their pregnancies, with an estimated 475,000 illegal abortions occurring annually. In 2008, about 1,000 women died from unsafe abortions. Modern contraception will prevent many tragedies, but Filipino leaders could do more. The law contains a measure that allows private and religion-affiliated hospitals to deny reproductive health services based on their moral and theological objections. Catholic hospitals are leading providers of healthcare in the Philippines, and this provision will put lives at risk by permitting health officials to choose what kind of care they administer. Finally, the law includes language from the nation’s constitution to protect the “life of the unborn”. Terminology like this is frequently exploited to establish full legal rights and protections for human embryos. In 2000, the Costa Rican constitutional chamber granted “personhood” to embryos through an interpretation of a similar provision in Costa Rica’s constitution. It banned in-vitro fertilisation – because some of the fertilised eggs created in the process are destroyed – and in so doing swiftly crushed the dream of building a family for thousands. The Philippines government should take note of the Costa Rican precedent. The same day President Aquino signed the reproductive health act into law, the inter-American court of human rights declared that Costa Rica’s ban on in-vitro fertilisation was a human rights violation, concluding that human embryos cannot be given absolute legal rights. The Philippines’ Catholic hierarchy and their allies have already launched an attack on the law. It crucial for the government to defend it ferociously on behalf of the countless women whose ability to plan their families would be devastated should opponents prevail. Ultimately, the true potential of the act rests with the president and the policymakers who brought about its passage. Together, they must exert the political will necessary to overcome religious opposition to women’s fundamental human rights and fully implement the act. It is a strong step towards dignity and equality for the women of the Philippines, but it is only the first.



Read and comment on this article at the Guardian >,


Related Posts

Ensuring Reproductive Rights: Reform to Address Women’s and Girls’ Need for Abortion After 20 Weeks in India

In May 2017, the Supreme Court of India denied a medical termination of pregnancy (MTP) to Z., a 35-year old...

Abortion, Legal Restrictions, Other Barriers, Contraception, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Maternal Mortality,Asia, India,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, Around the World, Reporting on Rights
Ensuring Reproductive Rights: Reform to Address Women’s and Girls’ Need for Abortion After 20 Weeks in India

Civil Society Declaration for Global Fammily Planning Summit

International human rights groups are urging world leaders attending next month’s global Family Planning Summit to ensure that any effort...

Abortion, Definitions, Contraception,Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America & Caribbean, Accountability Bodies,Engaging Policymakers, Around the World

Discriminatory or Rights Based? CHR Advisory on the Local Ordinance by the City of Manila

"By the issuance of EO 003, the City of Manila, an instrumentality and essential element of the state, committed a...

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Contraception, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,Asia, Philippines,Engaging Policymakers, Around the World

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2022)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up