On April 13, 2007, the Center filed a third party intervention in support of the national reproductive health and family planning regulations authorizing the free distribution of emergency contraception (EC). The Center’s intervention was a direct response to a petition filed before the Chilean Constitutional Court by a group of conservative parliamentarians to outlaw the […]
February, 2006New YorkPOHORELSKY, Magistrate Judge:The plaintiffs in this action seek judicial review, under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), see 5 U.S.C. § 706, and the United States Constitution, of the actions taken by the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) with respect to certain applications requesting the approval of over-the-counter access for Plan B, an […]
November 2006 POHORELSKY, Magistrate Judge:Before the court are various issues concerning discovery in this action, which challenges several determinations made by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)1 concerning Plan B, the so-called “morning after” pill. The plaintiffs seek an order requiring the production of various documents withheld on the basis of the deliberative process privilege, […]
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women’s health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access to the emergency contraceptive Plan B to women over 18. reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/crt_Galson_2.pdf
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women’s health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access to the emergency contraceptive Plan B to women over 18. reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/crt_Galson_1.pdf
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women’s health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access to the emergency contraceptive Plan B to women over 18. reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/crt_Woodcock_2.pdf
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women’s health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access to the emergency contraceptive Plan B to women over 18. reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/crt_Woodcock_1.pdf
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women’s health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access to the emergency contraceptive Plan B to women over 18. reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/crt_Crawford_transcript.pdf
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women’s health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access to the emergency contraceptive Plan B to women over 18. reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/JenkinsFullDeposition6.21.pdf
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women’s health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access to the emergency contraceptive Plan B to women over 18. reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/WoodDeposition7.31.pdf