Download the Preliminary Injunction Decision for Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey order below. https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/68-Order-55-page-Decision.pdf
This case challenges the constitutionality of onerous regulations and a sham licensing process adopted and implemented by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) that will cause most of the abortion providers in the State to cease providing ongoing abortion services. https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/12-Order-Granting-TRO-Pending-Hearing-on-App-for-TI-SIGNED-11-10-11.pdf
(REVISED 1.19.22) This case challenges a regulatory scheme that would have gone into effect on November 14, 2011. If enforced, the scheme would prevent the provision of abortion services in any medical establishment that does not meet burdensome and medically unnecessary licensing regulations. Case filed: November 9, 2011 State: Kansas Plaintiff(s): Hodes &, Nauser, MDs, […]
(PRESS RELEASE) Closing the door to massive infringements on women’s reproductive rights in Mississippi, voters in the state rejected today an extreme and dangerous “personhood” measure which would have amended the state’s constitution to define a fertilized egg as a legal person. The ballot initiative held the potential to not only ban abortion under all […]
The Centre for Health and Resource Management (CHARM) v. State of Bihar is a public interest case that seeks to hold the Government of India accountable for the poor conditions in public health facilities in the state of Bihar. This case was filed after Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) undertook a fact-finding mission in Munger, […]
Federal Court Blocks Demeaning North Carolina Ultrasound Law Middle District Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Preventing Key Measures of Intrusive and Biased Law from Going into Effect Tomorrow, Court Says Plaintiffs ‘Are Likely to Succeed on the Merits of the First Amendment Challenge’ (PRESS RELEASE) U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles granted in part a preliminary injunction […]
Center for Reproductive Rights Lawsuit Says Law Sacrifices Women’s Health to Ideological Agenda (PRESS RELEASE) The judge overseeing a lawsuit brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights to overturn a law severely restricting the use of medications to terminate pregnancies has granted a temporary injunction blocking the law’s enforcement. Today’s decision, handed down by Oklahoma […]
(PRESS RELEASE) Reviving recent efforts within Congress to dramatically roll back women’s access to reproductive health services, today the House of Representatives passed radical legislation that would ban abortion coverage for millions of women across the country and allow healthcare providers, including hospitals, to refuse a woman emergency abortion services, even if she would die […]
(PRESS RELEASE) As the Senate Appropriations Committee is scheduled to vote on a budget bill for the District of Columbia’s fiscal year 2012, the Center for Reproductive Rights called on members of the Senate to defeat any efforts to re-impose the longtime ban on abortion funding in the city. In the final bill funding appropriations […]
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants are ENJOINED from penalizing a physician, criminally or otherwise, under the Act1 when multiple physicians perform an abortion, and any one of those physicians, or a combination of them, comply with the Act’s requirements. Download the summarized preliminary injunction order below. https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Order-Texas-Medical-Providers-Performing-Abortion-Services-v.-Lakey-.pdf