Work: In the Courts

To explore more topics, search our full site.

Victory in Michigan: Court Strikes Down Abortion Restrictions as Violations of Voter-approved Amendment card link

Victory in Michigan: Court Strikes Down Abortion Restrictions as Violations of Voter-approved Amendment

Judge agrees with the Center's argument that three burdensome restrictions violate the Reproductive Freedom for All Act passed in 2022.

Abortion,United States,In the Courts,Story

Abortion Restrictions Struck Down by Michigan Court

05.13.25 (PRESS RELEASE) – Today, a Michigan state court permanently struck down several onerous and baseless abortion restrictions in the state. The court ruled that three challenged restrictions violate Michigan’s Reproductive Freedom for All (RFFA) [...]

Abortion,United States,In the Courts,News

Michigan Court of Claims Summary Judgment Order: Northland Family Planning Centers v. Michigan

Abortion,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Amicus Brief on the interpretation of Malawi’s Gender Equality Act.

The Center for Reproductive Rights amicus brief in relation to the interpretation and implementation of section 19 and 20 of the Malawi's Gender Equality Act (the "GEA").

Abortion,Africa, Malawi,In the Courts,Case Document

The Girls’ Stories

The girls in these cases had little to no access to sexual health and reproductive services—including abortion—and, after being sexually assaulted, were forced to remain pregnant and give birth at risk to their health and lives.

Abortion, Adolescent SRHR, SRHR General,Latin America & Caribbean, Ecuador, Guatemala, Nicaragua,In the Courts,Case
Amicus Brief in Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President, et al. card link

Amicus Brief in Susman Godfrey LLP v. Executive Office of the President, et al.

The Center's amicus brief on behalf of law firm Susman Godfrey LLP.

SRHR General,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Idaho Ruling Broadens Medical Exception to State’s Strict Abortion Bans

Patients facing life-threatening pregnancy complications and health conditions will be able to obtain abortion care—but those with fatal fetal diagnoses and serious mental health conditions will not.

Abortion,United States,In the Courts,Story

Ruling in Adkins v. State of Idaho: Media Highlights

An Idaho state court issued a ruling April 11 in Adkins v. State of Idaho, broadening the medical exception to the state’s total abortion ban. Center attorneys were interviewed about the ruling by several media [...]

Abortion,United States,In the Courts,Center in the Spotlight

Center Backs Law Firms Targeted by Trump Administration

Amicus briefs argue that the administration's orders against law firms threaten the rule of law.

SRHR General,United States,In the Courts, Reporting on Rights,Story

Idaho Court Says Women Can Get Abortions for Many Pregnancy Complications

Ruling expands the exceptions in one of the strictest abortion bans in the country, but many women are still left behind

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Press Releases