Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Whose Choice: Learn More

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Type:

News, Story

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

09.13.2010

News

Whose Choice: Learn More

Justin Goldberg

Share

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/hyde_banner_FINAL_0.jpg

Since 1976, the Hyde Amendment has been used to ban the federal government from spending money on abortion with very few exceptions. This means that low-income women enrolled in Medicaid have been most severely affected with repercussions revealing itself in three principal ways: procedures being delayed, additional financial strains being imposed on already difficult economic situations, and by forcing women to continue unwanted pregnancies.



Take a closer look at the history of the Hyde Amendment and how it has denied more than a million women the right to decide their own futures.



Executive Summary >, Scope of the Investigation and Methods >, How Hyde and Medicaid Work >, Profiles of Women Interviewed for Report >, State Funding for Abortion Under Medicaid >, Hyde’s Impact >, Human Rights Framework >, Abortion Funds: Providing Critical Support to Women in Need >, Conclusion >, Recommendations >,



_______________________________________________



Scope of the Investigation and Methods





From October 2009 through February 2010, researchers from the Center for Reproductive Rights (the Center) and the National Network of Abortion Funds (the Network) together conducted 27 interviews for this report. In conducting this research, the Center and the Network sought to collect a broad range of stories highlighting how poor women are adversely affected by the funding restrictions imposed by the Hyde Amendment. These stories are meant to be illustrative of Hyde’s impact.



Among those interviewed were 16 women from various regions of the United States whose lives have been affected by the Hyde Amendment. Criteria for participation in the investigation included residence in the District of Columbia or one of the 26 states that do not provide state Medicaid funding for abortion beyond the few exceptions permitted under the Hyde Amendment, being age 18 or over, being eligible for Medicaid (whether or not receiving it), and having sought financial assistance to pay for an abortion within the previous 12 months.



To recruit women, the Center collaborated with independent abortion providers who operate clinics in four locations in Texas, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Detroit, Michigan, Atlanta, Georgia, and Shreveport, Louisiana. , In addition, the Network recruited women by issuing a call to its national case manager and member Funds. Funds in Pennsylvania, Texas, Illinois, Georgia, Oregon, and Washington offered referrals, along with the Network’s national case manager.



The Center and the Network also interviewed one staff member at each of the collaborating clinics who counsels and supports women in obtaining abortions and, when needed, helps them to secure financial assistance. In addition, we interviewed representatives of three of the Network’s member Funds, who offered additional insight into the challenges that women face financing their abortions. (See Box: Abortion Funds: Providing Critical Support to Women in Need.)



Return to top



_______________________________________________



How Hyde and Medicaid Work





“The Hyde Amendment’s denial of public funds for medically necessary abortions plainly intrudes upon [women’s] constitutionally protected decision, for both by design and effect it serves to coerce indigent pregnant women to bear children that they would otherwise elect not to have.” – Justice Brennan, dissenting in Harris v. McRae, the Supreme Court decision finding the Hyde Amendment constitutional



Under the federal Medicaid program, federal and state governments jointly pay for healthcare services for eligible poor and low-income individuals and their families. Medicaid is the largest source of funding for medical and health-related services for low-income and indigent people in the United States. It currently provides health and long-term care services to 60 million individuals, including children and parents, persons with disabilities, and seniors. Medicaid plays a particularly important role for women, and especially women of reproductive age. One in ten women in the United States is covered by Medicaid, and women make up more than two-thirds of adult Medicaid beneficiaries. Thirty-seven percent of women of reproductive age in families with incomes below the federal poverty level rely on Medicaid for healthcare coverage. According to a 2009 Kaiser Family Foundation report, “Medicaid pays for more than four in ten births nationwide, and in several states, covers more than half of total births.”



States have the option of whether they want to participate in the federal Medicaid program, and if they do so, they agree to abide by certain program rules. All states have agreed to participate. Eligibility for a state Medicaid program is based on a complicated set of rules and varies tremendously across the country. Coverage is limited to only the poorest households, and yet not all people who are poor qualify for Medicaid.  The recently enacted healthcare reform legislation will expand Medicaid eligibility to all non-elderly adults living at or below 133% of the federal poverty line, thereby providing a safety net for millions of Americans who would otherwise be priced out of the insurance marketplace.



Read more >,



Return to top



_______________________________________________



Profiles of Women Interviewed for this Report









  • Eight of the women were Black/African-American, two were White/Caucasian, two were Hispanic, one was Puerto Rican, one was African-American and Caucasian, one was Caucasian and Indian-American, and one was African- and Cuban-American.

  • Thirteen had one or more children.

  • Three reported being in an abusive relationship leading to their unwanted pregnancy.









Work and School







  • Eight were in school full-time and either working (4), looking for work (2), about to start a job (1), or recently laid off (1).

  • Four worked full-time and were in school full- or part-time.

  • Seven worked part-time, one of whom had several part-time jobs.

  • Two were looking for work.












Enrollment in Public Assistance Programs or Sources of Other Financial Support




  • Eight received food stamps, another said that it was not worth missing work to collect them because they amounted to so little.

    • Three of the eight enrolled in the food stamp program following their abortions.

    • A ninth had a son who was able to obtain food from the federally funded Women, Infants and Children supplemental food program (WIC).

    • A tenth sought her sister’s assistance to help the family obtain sufficient food.



  • Four reported enrollment in public assistance.

  • One was enrolled in disability insurance.

  • Two obtained child support.






Medicaid and Health Insurance




  • Eight were enrolled in Medicaid at the time of the abortion.


    • Three of these only met income eligibility standards for Medicaid coverage while pregnant.



  • One had student health insurance.

  • Seven had no insurance at the time of the abortion.

    • One of these enrolled in Medicaid following her abortion.

    • Another had children enrolled in Medicaid.

    • A third was enrolled in Medicaid during a prior pregnancy.










Return to top



_______________________________________________



Hyde’s Impact





“There is some sort of assumption out there that women who choose abortion have not yet had a family, not yet gotten married, not yet started their careers. The majority of women who show up for abortion are already mothers, are between the ages of 20 and 24, are already sexually active and have been using birth control. I think it kind of shatters that stereotype of women who choose abortion. These women are our sisters, our mothers, our rulers, our leaders, our teachers, our principals, our rock stars, our political people, they’re everywhere…. The question is always what keeps women silent and what is so horrible here in our culture that we have a stigma that surrounds abortion that creates an area where women don’t feel as though they can be seen as good, so they choose to not talk about it….” – Vice President of Whole Woman’s Health



The Hyde Amendment’s restrictions affect low-income women in three principal ways: by causing them to delay procedures, by imposing additional financial strain on their already difficult economic situations and by forcing them to continue unwanted pregnancies.



As of 2006, the average amount women paid for a first-trimester abortion was $413, at 20 weeks, the cost of an abortion was roughly three times as much. The costs continue to rise and vary widely, influenced in part by how far along the pregnancy is, as well as by location and availability of providers. One woman interviewed reported paying over $600 for her abortion performed at 16 weeks, while another woman reported paying over $2,000 for an abortion at 17 weeks, and another was charged $1,510 for an abortion at 20 weeks.



Asked to describe some of the circumstances of the women whom they assist with paying for abortions, clinic counselors reported that many women have one or more children and are single, in school, working low-paying jobs or trying to enter the workforce, not receiving help from their children’s father, and working to make ends meet. One counselor reported that 75% or more of her clinic’s clients seeking funding assistance are enrolled in Medicaid and their stories include recent job loss, low-income jobs, and more than one child at home with no support from partners. Another said that “the majority [of women] were on birth control, but maintaining birth control was not easily accessible for them-either their prescription ran out or they couldn’t afford to get it renewed.” Another counselor reported speaking with women who say “‘I need an abortion, because I can’t afford another baby. I’m a single mom. I just got back to school, and I can’t afford to drop out of school right now. I just got the baby out of Pampers and to have another would cause too many setbacks.'”



The Women’s Medical Fund Director stated that many of the women the Fund serves are in precarious living situations. “A lot of women we talk to are virtually homeless. They’re not on the street and not in shelters, but they live short-term with family, with friends, with anybody who’s willing to take them and their kids in for six months or three months or any amount of time.”



Download the full report to read more >,



Return to top



_______________________________________________



Human Rights Framework



“If there was the reinstatement of Medicaid funding for abortion, low-income women would be able to pursue their dreams, move forward in their lives, and exercise the same right to choose that middle-class women can. Women would be able to turn their lives around. It would just make all the difference for women.” – Executive director of the Women’s Medical Fund





The Hyde Amendment violates the human rights of poor and low-income women. The restrictions interfere with a woman’s right to make fundamental decisions about her body, to access health services necessary to protect her health, and to decide whether and when to have children. The ability to make these decisions without government coercion is integral to women’s dignity and equality. The government’s failure to respect and ensure these rights violate a woman’s right to health, life, equality, information, education, and privacy, as well as freedom from discrimination.



The rights to life, privacy and personal autonomy, and non-discrimination are set forth in two human rights treaties ratified by the United States: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD). Treaty ratification confers an international legal obligation on the United States to respect, protect, and fulfill the rights contained in the treaty and to create the conditions necessary to ensure that all persons are able to enjoy rights in practice.



The United States is also a signatory to key human rights treaties that guarantee women’s right to reproductive healthcare and equality-among them, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The United States has an obligation not to take any action that would defeat the object or purpose of the treaties it has signed.



Download the full report to read more >,



Return to top


Related Posts

Azar v. Garza Amicus Brief

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Complaint: Falls Church Healthcare Center et al. v. Norman Oliver et al.

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Amicus Brief: State of California et al. v. Alex M. Azar et al.

Other Barriers, Contraception,United States,In the Courts

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2024)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Better Business Bureau Charity Watch Top Rated Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up