Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Top 5 Reasons Why the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Case Matters

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Legal Restrictions

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Type:

News, Story

Case Archive

For updates on this case and others, explore our case archive here.

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

03.28.2022

In the Courts Abortion United States Story

Top 5 Reasons Why the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Case Matters

Megan Diamondstein
U.S. abortion rights at risk: The far-reaching harm if the Supreme Court takes away the constitutional right to abortion.

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
Joy Asico/AP Images for the Center for Reproductive Rights

Before the end of its term in June, the U.S. Supreme Court will issue its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the most consequential abortion rights case in generations. In the case, in which the Center for Reproductive Rights is challenging a Mississippi abortion ban, the state of Mississippi has asked the Court to overturn Roe v. Wade and rule that there is no constitutional right to abortion.

A Supreme Court ruling in favor of Mississippi will cause grave harm to people seeking abortion care in the state and throughout the United States. A ruling to weaken or overturn Roe could take away a constitutional right that people have relied on for generations. It would also fundamentally undermine the rule of law, gender equality, and potentially, other constitutional rights, and lead to instability and uncertainty across the country.

Here are the five top reasons why Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health matters:

1.  A ruling to dismantle the right to abortion would harm millions.

Read more about the case.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization link

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

While this case involves a Mississippi abortion ban, a ruling upholding the ban would give the greenlight to anti-abortion lawmakers in other states looking to restrict or prohibit abortion. States are already gearing up: In 2021 alone, the Center tracked more than 400 restrictive anti-abortion measures introduced by states.

According to the Center’s “What if Roe fell?” tool, 24 states are poised to ban abortion if the Supreme Court weakens or overturns Roe. That would leave large swaths of the country—especially in the South and Midwest—without abortion access. Over 35 million women of reproductive age live in states likely to ban abortion—bans that, like other restrictions, would fall hardest on people who already face barriers to accessing health care due to systemic racism, implicit biases, and other forms of discrimination.

2.  Decades of progress on gender equality could be undone.

Reliance on the right to abortion has been essential to advancing gender equality in the U.S. Access to abortion has enabled generations of women to pursue personal, educational, and employment opportunities and life goals and helped counter the long history of discrimination that has limited women’s legal, social, and economic progress. Taking away that right would turn back the clock on this incremental—but essential—progress and limit women’s ability to participate fully and equally in society.

3. The rule of law hangs in the balance.

The Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutional right to abortion for almost 50 years. And every argument Mississippi has made for overruling Roe has been considered and rejected by the Court before. Revoking that right today would endanger the rule of law, and may reduce the public’s confidence in the Supreme Court. The rule of law—where laws are applied equitably, there are fair processes to enforce them, and laws are subject to an independent judiciary—is crucial for a stable, orderly, and just society.

A ruling that dismantles constitutional protection for the right to abortion would also lead to instability and uncertainty across the country. As half the country moved to ban abortion, there would be chaos in the courts and significant harm for pregnant people and their families as they struggle to access the essential health care they need.

4. The Court could eliminate a constitutional right for the first time in history.

WHPA would protect abortion access nationwide.

Women's Health Protection ActWomen’s Health Protection Act link

Women’s Health Protection Act

If the Supreme Court overturns Roe and finds there is no right to abortion, it will mark a devastating milestone: the first time in our country’s history that the Court has taken away a constitutional right. Reaffirmed by the Court numerous times, the right to abortion has been fundamental to people’s lives for generations. Will the Court abandon its duty to protect our essential and long-established rights?

5. More constitutional rights are at stake.

Roe is not only about abortion—it’s also the basis for a range of other liberty rights recognized by the Supreme Court. Since Roe, the Court has repeatedly reaffirmed that the Constitution protects abortion as an essential liberty, which is tied to other liberty rights to make personal decisions about family, relationships, and bodily autonomy. Weakening or eliminating the right to abortion puts other rights protected by the 14th Amendment at risk—such as marriage equality, the right to engage in private sexual conduct, and the right to use contraception.

WHPA Would Protect Abortion Access Nationwide

The Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA) is federal legislation that would establish a statutory right for health care professionals to provide, and a corresponding right for their patients to receive, abortion care—free from restrictions and bans. The bill was passed by the U.S. House in a historic vote in September 2021 but did not receive the 60 votes needed to overcome the Senate’s filibuster in February 2022. WHPA is supported by a majority of voters in the U.S. and the Center will continue to advocate for it to protect abortion rights across the country. Read more about WHPA here.

Read more:

  • The case in-depth: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
  • Roe v. Wade: The landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling recognizing the right to abortion

Tags: US Supreme Court, US Supreme Court case, SCOTUS, mississippi abortion ban, Mississippi abortion law, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Related Posts

Brief for Petitioners – June Medical Services v. Gee

Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts

Join us at the U.S. Supreme Court to rally for abortion access

On Wednesday, March 4, the Center for Reproductive Rights will present arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in June Medical Services v. Russo (formerly June Medical Services v. Gee)—a...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Roe at Risk: U.S. Supreme Court to Review Mississippi’s Abortion Ban, a Direct Challenge to Roe v. Wade

The Center for Reproductive Rights will return to the United States Supreme Court next term to defend the right to...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts
Roe at Risk: U.S. Supreme Court to Review Mississippi’s Abortion Ban, a Direct Challenge to Roe v. Wade

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2022)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up