Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

The Hill’s Congress Blog: Healthcare reform extremists take a page from an ugly anti-choice playbook

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

03.30.2010

The Hill’s Congress Blog: Healthcare reform extremists take a page from an ugly anti-choice playbook

Justin Goldberg

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
By Sarah Lipton-Lubet, Legislative Policy Counsel at Center for Reproductive Rights

A lot has happened since the House passed and the President signed long-awaited landmark health care reform legislation.  While many are celebrating (the Vice President with his trademark colorfulness), other responses have been . . . less positive. In the last week, the windows of several Democratic party offices have been bashed in. An anonymous caller threatened Rep. Slaughter’s children – and the children of all House members who voted for health care reform – with sniper attacks.  Someone went as far as to cut the propane gas line at Representative Tom Perriello’s brother’s house – after a tea party activist posted the brother’s address on the internet, thinking it was the Congressman’s.  By mid-week, at least 10 lawmakers had reported security concerns.  And the threats are continuing. Many Americans are shocked that a debate over expanding health care access has spiraled into death threats and vandalism.  Rightly so.  Violence has no place in our democracy.  Unfortunately, the pro-choice community is all too familiar with these tactics as a response to the provision of basic healthcare.  We’ve seen this playbook before.   Last year, in the wake of the murder of Dr. George Tiller – the abortion provider who was gunned down one Sunday while serving as an usher at his church – the Center for Reproductive Rights put out a report documenting the harassment, intimidation, discrimination, and violence perpetrated against the brave men and women who provide abortions, or counsel women about their options, or check them in at reception desks.   Not content with their victories in legislatures or at the voting booth, anti-choice extremists have long resorted to murder, bombings, arsons, and assaults.  In 2008 alone, the National Abortion Federation compiled reports of 13 bomb threats, 8 clinic blockades, 19 stalkings, 193 incidents of trespassing or vandalism, and 374 incidents of harassing phone calls or hate mail, though the actual number of incidents for most categories likely goes underreported.   Implied and direct threats to the family members of abortion providers is another favorite ploy.  Anti-choice websites have provided information about providers’ children, including the routes that they use to walk to and from school.  (Note that an anti-health care ad picturing Representative Steve Driehaus’s two young daughters specifically called out the reform bill as including federal funding for abortion.  The sponsors of the ad have apparently apologized, but other healthcare opponents have posted his home address online and are planning to protest there.) Women who are brave enough to tell their abortion stories – to speak honestly and openly about the choices they have made and the difficulties they have faced – are also routinely harassed and demeaned.  The Center recently worked with a woman who wanted to speak about how government restrictions prevent her insurance from covering her $9,000 abortion.  The response?  She received a threatening call at her work.  Another woman, Angie Jackson, was advised by her doctors that continuing her pregnancy could threaten her life.  She chronicled her abortion experience over twitter.  What happened next?  Death threats and FBI involvement in her security. Despite the fact that the health care reform legislation (and the accompanying Executive Order anti-choice Congressman Bart Stupak extorted from the White House) actually restricts access to abortion for millions of women, anti-choicers have been screaming bloody murder (not to mention “baby killer”), falsely claiming that the bill provides for federal funding of abortion.  (We should be so lucky.  For more on how the package signed by the President undermines access to abortion, see here, here, and here).  Indeed, Rep. Stupak himself has received death threats as thanks for his efforts (talk about hard to please!).  Apparently it’s gotten so bad that his wife has stopped answering the phone.  Rep. Stupak – welcome to our world. This loss of dignity in our democracy and the tone of political disagreement matters. Whatever side you’re on regarding either the debate over healthcare or abortion rights, enough is enough. It is time for threats and harassment to end, and for responsible leaders to recognize that access to healthcare – including reproductive healthcare – is a fundamental right and not a cause for mayhem.



Blog originally posted at The Hill’s Congress Blog.


Related Posts

Azar v. Garza Amicus Brief

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Complaint: Falls Church Healthcare Center et al. v. Norman Oliver et al.

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Amicus Brief: State of California et al. v. Alex M. Azar et al.

Other Barriers, Contraception,United States,In the Courts

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2022)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up