Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • #TheForwardFight
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP): Avoiding the TRAP

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • #TheForwardFight
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion

Regions:

United States

Work:

Reporting on Rights

Type:

Publications, Fact Sheets

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

11.01.2007

Reporting on Rights Abortion United States Publications

Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP): Avoiding the TRAP

Justin Goldberg

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id


“TRAP” laws (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) target the medical practices of doctors who provide abortions, and impose on them burdensome requirements which are different and more stringent than the legal requirements imposed on other medical practices. These excessive and unnecessary government regulations increase the cost and scarcity of abortion services, harming women’s health and inhibiting their reproductive choices. To give just a couple of examples, such regulations may: (1) require extensive renovations of the abortion provider’s physical facility, (2) threaten patient privacy by authorizing unannounced inspections when patients are present, and (3) require that registered nurses, who are generally in short supply and high demand nationwide, carry out functions for which they are over-qualified.


TRAP laws fall into three broad categories: health facility licensing schemes, ambulatory surgical center requirements, and hospitalization requirements. Each of these types of TRAP laws is discussed below. A number of states impose more than one of these types of TRAP laws on abortion providers. For example, some states impose both a health facility licensing scheme on providers of all abortions and an ambulatory surgical center requirement on providers of second trimester abortions. It should also be noted that some states regulate abortion providers as part of a generally applicable health facility licensing scheme that applies equally to providers of other, comparable medical procedures. Because those schemes do not specifically “target” abortion providers, they are not considered TRAP laws and are not discussed herein.


Health Facility Licensing Schemes


Many states impose on abortion providers health facility licensing requirements that are not imposed on other providers of comparable medical procedures. These requirements vary considerably in terms of their breadth and burdens, and may include physical plant specifications, warrantless searches, personnel requirements, onerous administrative policies, and expensive licensing fees. Additionally, while some such schemes apply to all abortion providers, including providers of only medication abortions, other schemes (1) exempt abortion providers who perform less than a specified number of abortions in a given time period, (2) apply only to providers of abortions after the first trimester, (3) exempt private physicians’ offices, or (4) apply only to providers of surgical abortions.


The following states impose targeted health facility licensing schemes on providers of abortions at any stage of pregnancy:


Alabama
Arizona1
Arkansas
Connecticut
Florida
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Michigan
Mississippi
Missouri
Nebraska
Oklahoma
North Carolina
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Texas
Wisconsin


The following states impose targeted health facility licensing schemes on providers of second-trimester abortions:


Minnesota
Utah


Ambulatory Surgical Center Requirements


Ambulatory surgical center (“ASC”) requirements mandate that abortion providers become licensed as ASCs and meet all requirements imposed on ASCs. ASC regulations usually include all of the types of burdensome requirements imposed by health facility licensing schemes, as well as stringent physical plant requirements, which generally cannot be met by doctors’ offices or outpatient clinics, and which go far beyond the recommendations of recognized medical guidelines.


The following state requires ASC licensing of providers of abortions at any stage of pregnancy:


Missouri2


The following states require ASC licensing of providers of second trimester abortions:


Georgia
Indiana
Mississippi3
New Jersey
Virginia
Illinois (post-18 weeks)
Rhode Island (post-19 weeks)
South Carolina (post-18 weeks)
Texas (post-16 weeks)


Hospitalization Requirements


Hospitalization requirements mandate that abortions after a specified gestational age (generally some point in the second trimester) be performed in a hospital. Many states have some type of hospitalization requirement on the books, however, the vast majority of those laws have been declared unconstitutional by a court ruling or state official, or have been invalidated by another law.


The following states have hospitalization requirements that have not been challenged or declared unenforceable:


Alaska: applies to all second trimester abortions
Arkansas: applies to abortions post 20-weeks
North Carolina: applies to abortions post-20 weeks
Nevada: applies to abortions post-24 weeks


The following states have hospitalization requirements that have been rendered unenforceable:


Idaho (pursuant to attorney general opinion)
Massachusetts (pursuant to court ruling)
Missouri (pursuant to court ruling)
New York (pursuant to Department of Health official’s interpretation)
North Dakota (pursuant to court ruling)
Ohio (pursuant to court ruling)
Oklahoma (pursuant to court ruling)
Pennsylvania (invalidated by another law)
South Dakota (law not triggered because it applies only if abortions are available from hospitals in the state, and hospital-based abortions are not available)
Tennessee (pursuant to court ruling)
Utah (invalidated by another law)
Wisconsin (pursuant to court ruling)


1. Preliminarily enjoined by stipulation and order. Tucson Women’s Clinic v. Eden, No. CIV 00-141 (D. Ariz. Oct. 23, 2000). Case is pending as of November, 2007.
2. Preliminarily enjoined by federal court. Planned Parenthood v. Drummond, No. 07-4164-CV-C-ODS (D. Mo. Sep. 24, 2007). Case is pending as of November, 2007.
3. Mississippi’s requirement that abortion providers become licensed as ambulatory surgical facilities was struck down by a federal court ruling. However, a new law was passed requiring abortion providers to meet ASC requirements without being licensed as ASCs. The new law has not been challenged.


Related Posts

Adams & Boyle, P.C. et al v. Slatery, et al: Order

Abortion,United States,Reporting on Rights

MKB Management Corp v. Burdick: Order Adopting Settlement Stipulation

Order from the trial court adopting the settlement stipulation awarding attorney's fees and costs from the state of North Dakota.

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), Reporting on Rights

MKB Management Corp v. Burdick: Eighth Circuit Court Decision

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), Reporting on Rights

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2023)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up