Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Abortion and Gender Equality: Spotlight on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Legal Restrictions

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Type:

News, Story

Case Archive

For updates on Center cases, explore our case archive here.

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

11.09.2021

In the Courts Abortion United States Story

Abortion and Gender Equality: Spotlight on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health

Megan Diamondstein
The reliance on the right to abortion has been essential to advancing women’s equality.

Share

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
Diane Bondareff/AP Images for Center for Reproductive Rights

For almost five decades, the right to abortion has helped advance gender equality in the U.S. This right, essential to all people capable of becoming pregnant, protects each individual’s ability to decide and control their own reproductive future.

Learn more about the case.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization link

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

This consequential abortion rights case being argued on December 1 marks the first time the U.S. Supreme Court will review the constitutionality of a pre-viability abortion ban since Roe v. Wade.

The reliance on the right to abortion has enabled generations of women to pursue personal, educational, and employment opportunities and life goals and helped to counter the long history of discrimination that has limited women’s legal, social, and economic progress.

That’s why hundreds of economists, athletes, gender equality advocates and scholars, and organizations representing young women and women lawyers, are urging the Supreme Court to throw out a Mississippi abortion ban and uphold the right to abortion. They presented their arguments in numerous “friend of the court” briefs filed in support of a case the Center for Reproductive Rights will be arguing on December 1.

The case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, is the most consequential abortion rights case in generations

The case challenges a Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that was ruled unconstitutional in lower courts. It marks the first time the Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of a pre-viability abortion ban since Roe v. Wade in 1973. In Roe, the Court recognized that the decision whether to continue a pregnancy or have an abortion—which impacts a person’s body, health, family, and future—belongs to the individual, not the government.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health  was brought by the Center and its partners on behalf of Jackson Women’s Health Organization — the last remaining abortion clinic left in Mississippi.

The “friend of the court” briefs assert that:
  • Generations of women have relied on having the right to abortion–whether or not they exercise that right–to make decisions for their health, lives, and futures.
  • The right to abortion has empowered women to participate more fully in society and to attain higher levels of education, employment, and economic security. 
  • Research confirms that abortion care has had a measurable and significant impact on these advancements. 
  • Abortion bans disproportionately impact women of color, young women, women with low incomes, rural women, and others facing discriminatory barriers to care. 
Highlights of the amicus briefs and their arguments:

Listen to oral arguments at the Supreme Court.

December 1 @ 10:00 a.m. ET

Arguments will be livestreamed on the U.S. Supreme Court website.

Economists 

Abortion has a measurable and significant impact on gender equality.

The impact of abortion access on gender equality is measurable and significant, according to this brief by over 150 leading economists. Advancements in statistics have enabled economists to “credibly and rigorously measure the causal impact of a wide range of policies, including the impact of abortion access on women’s lives.” 

The research shows that Roe has played a causal role in women’s social and economic advancement, with the greatest impact on young women and Black women. For example, for young women, “…access to abortion increased the probability they finished college by nearly 20 percentage points and the probability that they entered a professional occupation by nearly 40 percentage points.” These effects “tended to be greater among Black women.” The brief also states that the “social, cultural, and legal shifts in the thirty years since Casey have not erased the need for abortion access…” For example, the brief cites the limited availability of reliable and affordable contraception and childcare, as well as inflexible family leave policies. For these reasons, overturning or limiting Roe and Casey would directly harm people seeking access to abortion care. Read the brief by economists.

Athletes

Athletes depend on the right to abortion to fully and equally participate in athletics.

This brief argues that without abortion access, “women and girls would be deprived of the multitude of collateral benefits that result from athletic participation, including greater educational success, career advancement, enhanced self-esteem, and improved health.” Among amici are over 500 athletes representing all levels of sport from Olympic gold medalists to high school players, with many sharing their personal stories of accessing abortion care at a critical point in their athletic careers. 

For example, Crissy Perham, a swimmer and an Olympic gold medalist, described her abortion experience as being “…given a second chance at life…That choice ultimately led me to being an Olympian, a college graduate, and a proud mother today.” The brief explains further that the window in which athletes can reach their highest level of performance is limited and that pregnancy fundamentally alters a person’s body in a way that is incompatible with peak athletic performance. Without access to abortion care, women would be unable to fully and equally participate in athletics to the benefit of themselves, their communities, and their country. Read the brief by athletes.

Gender Equality Organizations

Abortion is protected by the 14th Amendment’s guarantees of liberty and equality. 

The National Women’s Law Center and 72 other organizations dedicated to gender equality argue that overturning Roe would violate the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of liberty and equality for all Americans. They also show why the right is necessary to secure the “autonomy, health, and economic opportunity of people who can become pregnant.” Overturning Roe would “uniquely harm” people of color, young people, those with low incomes, LGBTQ individuals, those in abusive relationships, and people with disabilities.

The brief offers research that Mississippi’s own record of hostility toward reproductive rights has resulted in gender disparities in economic and health outcomes. “Compared to women who obtained abortion care, those who were denied such care and subsequently gave birth were nearly four times more likely to live below the federal poverty line and less likely to have a full-time job several months later.” Read the brief by gender equality organizations.

Organizations Representing Young Women

Young women rely on the right to abortion to advance their educational, employment, and economic opportunities at a decisive point in their careers. 

Young women rely on the right to abortion during “the pivotal years when they are embarking on educational, career, and personal journeys that shape their lives,” according to a brief submitted by YWCA USA and three other organizations that promote the welfare and status of young women, and particularly, young women of color. When young women are able to make decisions about their reproductive lives, they can reach their goals in regard to, “educational attainment, workforce participation, long-term economic security, and health.” 

The brief presents research demonstrating that “Since Roe, young women have increasingly and steadily attended college and pursued careers…Research makes clear that there is a connection between abortion access and educational attainment…abortion access led to significant increases in high school graduation, college entrance, and labor force participation, particularly among Black women.” Finally, the brief points out that young women have only ever known a life in which the right to abortion care exists. Overturning Roe would strip young women of a right they have relied on to build their lives and determine their futures and would jeopardize their health, education, employment, and quality of life. Read the brief by YWCA USA and other amici on behalf of young women.

Organizations of Women Lawyers

Women lawyers have relied on the right to abortion to make gains in their field. 

The Supreme Court cannot overturn Roe because of women’s “widespread and long-standing reliance” on the right to abortion before viability, according to a brief submitted by the National Association of Women Lawyers and 29 other organizations representing women lawyers. As this brief notes: “Women attorneys rely on the rights guaranteed by Roe and Casey to advance their careers and achieve greater gender parity in the legal field.” 

The brief also addresses the reality of what losing the right would mean for women lawyers: “Considering the limited resources and opportunities available to women lawyers with children, particularly against the backdrop of the ongoing pandemic, losing the ability to decide whether and when to have their children, and how many children to have, would undoubtedly be detrimental to women lawyers’ careers.” Read the brief by organizations of women lawyers.

No Middle Ground

The Supreme Court cannot uphold Mississippi’s abortion ban without overturning the core holding of Roe v. Wade and almost 50 years of precedent. As these briefs demonstrate, since the Supreme Court first recognized the constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy before viability in Roe, the right to abortion has been a lifeline for generations of people wishing to reach their educational, career, economic, and personal goals.

If Roe were overturned, almost half of the states in the country are poised to ban abortion and 12 states, including Mississippi, have already enacted “trigger bans” to outlaw abortion as soon as Roe is overturned. Read “What if the Supreme Court overturns Roe?”

More than 50 amicus briefs were filed in support of the Center’s case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Click here to see the list.

Read more about the case:

  • Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
  • Listen to oral arguments on December 1 @ 10 a.m. ET.

Tags: SCOTUS, mississippi abortion ban, abortion in mississippi, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, gender equality

Related Posts

Brief for Petitioners – June Medical Services v. Gee

Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts

Join us at the U.S. Supreme Court to rally for abortion access

On Wednesday, March 4, the Center for Reproductive Rights will present arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court in June Medical Services v. Russo (formerly June Medical Services v. Gee)—a...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Roe at Risk: U.S. Supreme Court to Review Mississippi’s Abortion Ban, a Direct Challenge to Roe v. Wade

The Center for Reproductive Rights will return to the United States Supreme Court next term to defend the right to...

Abortion,United States,In the Courts
Roe at Risk: U.S. Supreme Court to Review Mississippi’s Abortion Ban, a Direct Challenge to Roe v. Wade

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2024)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Better Business Bureau Charity Watch Top Rated Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up