Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • What if Roe Fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • What if Roe Fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map
    • Take Action Toolkit
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal
Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • What if Roe Fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • What if Roe Fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map
    • Take Action Toolkit
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Funding for Reproductive Healthcare, Discriminatory Policies, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care, Maternal Mortality

Regions:

Latin America & Caribbean, Brazil

Work:

At the United Nations

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

  • Hidden

09.01.2010

At the United Nations Funding for Reproductive Healthcare Latin America & Caribbean

Statement to ECOSOC: Maternal Mortality and the MDGs

Justin Goldberg

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id

The approach of the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) Summit in September provides a key opportunity for states and the international community to reassess their progress and confront challenges to achieving the MDGs. The Center for Reproductive Rights thus welcomes the United Nations Economic and Social Council’s (ECOSOC) decision to dedicate the 2010 Annual Ministerial Review (AMR) to examining progress toward the MDGs through the lens of gender equality and empowerment. Nowhere is the need for this gender lens clearer than in regard to MDG 5: Improve Maternal Health. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 536,000 women died of pregnancy and child birth-related complications in 2005.1    It is estimated that another 10 million women suffer from chronic injuries, infection, disease and disability related to pregnancy and child birth every year.2


Even in countries that have made progress on many of the MDGs, efforts to reduce maternal mortality continue to be inadequate. Brazil, which is making a National Voluntary Presentation at the AMR this year, is one such country. According to the WHO, Brazil has a maternal mortality ratio of 110 deaths per 100,000 live births.3    While the Government of Brazil calculates its maternal mortality ratio to be significantly lower – 53.4 deaths per 100,000 live births in 20054 – it also acknowledges that under-reporting makes it difficult to accurately assess rates of maternal death.5    Both estimates, however, indicate that Brazil’s maternal mortality ratio is higher than those of countries in the region with comparable socio-economic status and are far above the WHO’s acceptable rate of 10-20 deaths per 100,000 live births. These deaths are not inevitable: The Government of Brazil itself notes that 90 percent of these maternal deaths could be prevented with adequate medical care.6


Brazil’s failure to effectively address maternal mortality jeopardizes its progress on all of the MDGs, including Goal 3 on gender equality and empowerment. While the United Nations Development Program’s (UNDP) MDG Monitor notes that Brazil has already achieved Goal 3,7 the country’s high maternal mortality rates suggest otherwise. Preventable maternal mortality is both a form and a symptom of discrimination against women and deprives women of their right to live a healthy life on a basis of equality with men.


Maternal Mortality in Brazil


Brazil is a middle-income country with a health care system that guarantees universal free access to services. Hospital births account for 96 percent of all births, and in urban centers, this rate increases to more than 99 percent.8    Yet, broad access to hospitals for delivery has not translated into safe pregnancy for many Brazilian women, indicating the failure of the government to ensure equitable access to high quality services.


At the facility level, quality of care is often shockingly low. Many medical practitioners continue to rely on unnecessary, painful and potentially harmful delivery practices, such as the use of forceps for certain deliveries and over-reliance on caesarean sections.9    Numerous studies have documented women’s complaints of neglect and verbal abuse by health care providers during labor.10    Unsurprisingly, many women experience these types of practices as a threat to their emotional and physical integrity, and they often compromise the quality of care that women receive.11


Additionally, Brazil’s referral systems are purported to “function so poorly, [that] pregnant women sometimes scramble to find an available hospital bed when they enter labor.”12    A recent profile of health-care facilities conducted by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics revealed that the number of hospital beds in public and private hospitals actually declined between 1986 and 2005, and significant differences in terms of size and technological capacity of hospitals persist, with the North and Northeast having far fewer beds and well-equipped facilities than the southern regions.13 Brazil also does not meet WHO guidelines14 for the number and distribution of emergency and basic obstetric care facilities for women in rural and poor regions, essential components of any program to reduce maternal mortality.15


These problems stem from larger issues of inequality within Brazil’s health system. The transfer of federal funds to states and municipalities tends to favor richer states, particularly in the South and Southeast, to the detriment of poorer states with greater health care problems, because the transfers are generally dependent on existing infrastructure, as opposed to actual health needs.16 Additionally, the reliance of high-income groups on the public health system for more complicated and expensive procedures not covered by private providers has raised the cost of services for the poor and limits the ability of the health care system to expand the coverage of regular services for low-income populations. Because of this situation, the Brazil UN Country Team has called for a reallocation of resources to better serve the needs of the country’s poor.17


Regional disparities also intersect with racial and ethnic inequality. According to Brazil’s health ministry, Afro-Brazilian women are 50 percent more likely to die of obstetric-related causes than are white women.18    Risk of maternal death also disproportionately affects indigenous and low- income women, especially adolescents and women from rural areas.19    Women from these groups tend to receive fewer health services and lower quality of care, contributing to their vulnerability to maternal mortality.20    According to a U.N. study, nationwide, 66 percent of black women and 74 percent of indigenous women received fewer than six prenatal visits, compared to only 45 percent of white women.21    Black women were also provided with less information about pregnancy, delivery and post-natal care of children, including signs of labor, importance of early breastfeeding and importance of prenatal examinations.22


Unsafe abortion is also a leading cause of maternal mortality, accounting for more than nine percent of maternal deaths in Brazil.23    Abortion is illegal except in cases of rape or danger to a woman’s life. However, an estimated 1 million abortions, the vast majority of which are illegal, are performed in the country every year,24 and approximately 250,000 women and girls are hospitalized for complications of these procedures annually.25    Rates of abortion and abortion– related complications are higher in poorer regions of the country and among more disadvantaged racial and ethnic groups, contributing significantly to the vulnerability of these women to maternal death and injury.26


The government of Brazil has launched several policies and programs to address maternal mortality, including establishing nearly 300 regional, municipal and hospital-based maternal mortality committees to monitor the number and causes of maternal deaths. Brazil’s limited progress on MDG Goal 5, however, demonstrates that these measures have fallen short of addressing the underlying issues of discrimination and inequality that contribute to maternal mortality in Brazil.


Addressing Maternal Mortality Worldwide


Brazil’s failure to adequately address issues of discrimination and inequality that underlie maternal mortality is not unique, nor is the path to preventing these deaths unknown. The Center urges the international community to recognize that addressing maternal mortality both requires and is essential to achieving gender equality and empowerment, and to take the following steps to address this issue:



Access to maternal health care, including skilled delivery and emergency obstetric care, is recognized as essential to maternal health. States should invest greater resources in improving the accessibility, acceptability, affordability and quality of these health care services and referral systems, particularly in poor and rural areas.


States must recognize and address socio-economic, racial, ethnic and other factors that contribute to differential vulnerability to maternal mortality, and undertake special measures to ensure that these groups are empowered to access comprehensive sexual and reproductive health care.


States should develop and implement effective monitoring and accountability mechanisms in order to accurately and effectively account for and address maternal deaths.


Complications of unsafe abortions are estimated to account for 13 percent of maternal deaths worldwide. States must liberalize their abortion laws and take proactive steps to ensure that women can access both safe abortion and post-abortion care services.



 




Footnotes:



  1. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ET AL., MATERNAL MORTALITY IN 2005: ESTIMATES DEVELOPED BY WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA AND THE WORLD BANK 1 (2007) [hereinafter WHO, MATERNAL MORTALITY IN 2005]. The Center welcomed the release of new worldwide data on maternal mortality in the Lancet in April 2010. In this written submission, however, the Center has chosen to rely on the most recent official data on maternal mortality from the United Nations. The Center looks forward to the United Nations’ release of updated data later this year and to a continued discussion of the best methodologies for accurately measuring rates of maternal mortality.

  2. UK All Party Parliamentary Group on Population, Development and Reproductive Health, Better off Dead? A Report on Maternal Morbidity, at 3 &amp, 10 (May 2009), available at www.health-… e.co.za/uploaded/2abf4f8cc84c760af51ea81585badf01.pdf.

  3. WHO, MATERNAL MORTALITY IN 2005, supra note 1, at 23.

  4. PRESIDENCY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL, MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS: NATIONAL MONITORING REPORT 78 (2007) [hereinafter BRAZIL, MDG NATIONAL MONITORING REPORT 2007].

  5. Id.

  6. Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Second periodic report submitted by States parties under articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant, Brazil, para. 418, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/BRA/2 (Jan. 28, 2008).

  7. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), MDG Monitor, www.mdgmonitor.org… (last accessed April 27, 2010) [Notes that current status of each Goal is in accordance with national Government reporting].

  8. See Simone Grilo Diniz et al., Empowering women in Brazil, 370 Lancet1596, 1596-1597 (November 10, 2007) [hereinafter Empowering women in Brazil].

  9. Id. at 1596-97, see also BRAZIL, MDG NATIONAL MONITORING REPORT 2007, supra note 4, at 79.

  10. See Ana Flávia Pires Lucas d’Oliveira, Simone Grilo Diniz &amp, Lilia Blima Schraiber, Violence against women in health-care institutions: an emerging problem 359 Lancet 1681-82, 1681-1685 (May 11, 2002).

  11. Id.

  12. See WORLD BANK, Brazil: Maternal and Child Health, ¶ A20 at 63, Report No. 23811-BR (2002), available at www-… wds.worldbank.org… ered/PDF/multi0page.pdf (last visited on April 27, 2010) [hereinafter Brazil: Maternal and Child Health], see also Sandra Valongueiro Alves, Maternal Mortality in Pernambuco, Brazil: What Has Changed in Ten Years? 15 (30) Reproductive Health Matters 141, 134-144 (2007).

  13. See PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION (PAHO), Brazil: Health System Profile 35 (2008), available at www.lachealthsys.org… (last visited on April 27, 2010).

  14. See generally UNICEF, WHO AND UNFPA: GUIDELINES FOR MONITORING THE AVAILABILITY AND USE OF OBSTETRIC SERVICES (1997), available at whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/1997/9280631985.pdf….

  15. See INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE), ASSISTÉNCIA MÉDICA SANITÁRIA 2005: MALHA MUNICIPAL DIGITAL DO BRASIL: SITUAÇÃO EM 2005.

  16. See OECD, Economic Survey of Brazil 2005: Better Targeting Government Social Spending 9 (2004), available at www.oecd.org… (last visited on April 27, 2010), see also ANDRE CEZAR MEDICI, Financing Health Policies in Brazil: Achievements, Challenges and Proposals (Inter-American Development Bank 2002), available at idbdocs.iadb.org… (last visited on April 27, 2010).

  17. UNITED NATIONS COUNTRY TEAM BRAZIL, A UN Reading of Brazil’s Challenges and Potential: Common Country Assessment by Brazil’s UNCT, ¶ 46, at 15 (2005), available at www.unodc.org… (last visited on April 27, 2010) [hereinafter UN Reading of Brazil’s Challenges and Potential].

  18. BRAZILIAN HEALTH MINISTRY, BRAZIL HEALTH 2006: AN ANALYSIS OF INEQUALITY IN HEALTH (MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE, SAÚDE BRASIL 2006 – UMA ANÁLISE DA DESIGUALDADE EM SAÚDE) 366 (2006) [hereinafter BRAZIL HEALTH 2006: AN ANALYSIS OF INEQUALITY IN HEALTH].

  19. Id. at 367.

  20. MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE, POLÍTICA NACIONAL DE ATENÇÃO INTEGRAL A SAÚDE DA MULHER: PRINCIPIOS E DIRETRIZES 26 (2004), Brazil: Maternal and Child Health, supra note 12, para. 2.8 at 20-21.

  21. UN Reading of Brazil’s Challenges and Potential, supra note 17, ¶ 41, at 14.

  22. Articulación de Organizaciones de Mujeres Negras Brasileñas (AMNB), Dossier Regarding the Situation of Black Women in Brazil, 25 (July 2007).

  23. BRAZIL, MDG NATIONAL MONITORING REPORT 2007, supra note 4, at 78.

  24. See Ipas Brasil and Instituto de Medicina Social, Magnitude do Aborto no Brasil: uma análise dos resultados de pesquisa (2007), available at www.cc…

  25. See Ipas Brazil, Unsafe abortion hits hard in Brazil, www.ipas.org… (last accessed April 27, 2010).

  26. See    Ipas Brasil, Supplementary information for review of periodic report by State of Brazil during the 42nd CESCR Committee session, 7 (2009), available at www2.ohchr.org… (last accessed April 27, 2010).


Related Posts

Decision: Alyne da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil

In the first maternal death case to be decided by an international human rights body, the United Nations Committee on...

Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care, Maternal Mortality,Latin America & Caribbean, Brazil,In the Courts, At the United Nations

The Human Rights Committee Urges Malawi to Safeguard Sexual and Reproductive Rights

In July 2014, the United Nations Human Rights Committee (the Committee), which monitors states’ implementation of the International Covenant on...

Abortion, Legal Protections, Legal Restrictions, Other Barriers, Adolescent SRHR, Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Legal Protections, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,Africa, Malawi, Latin America & Caribbean, Peru, Accountability Bodies, United Nations,At the United Nations, Reporting on Rights

Alyne v. Brazil: Case of Alyne da Silva Pimentel Teixeira (“Alyne”) v. Brazil

Alyne, una Afro-Brasilera de 28 años murió por complicaciones de un embarazo después de que un centro de salud privado...

Abortion, Maternal Health, Maternal Mortality,Latin America & Caribbean, Brazil,At the United Nations

Sign up for our newsletter.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2021)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up