Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Richmond Times-Dispatch: Virginia’s controversy continues

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Legal Restrictions

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Type:

Center in the Spotlight

Case Archive

For updates on Center cases, explore our case archive here.

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

07.23.2012

In the Courts Abortion United States Center in the Spotlight

Richmond Times-Dispatch: Virginia’s controversy continues

Justin Goldberg

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
Richmond Times-Dispatch: Virginia’s controversy continues
By Michelle Movahed, Staff Attorney, Center for Reproductive Rights

Last month, the Virginia Board of Health rightfully honored its mission to promote and protect the health of all Virginians, rejecting an unnecessary regulation for reproductive health care providers that would have forced nearly all the state’s existing clinics that provide abortion services to either rebuild from the ground up or close. But despite this reasonable and common-sense approach, Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell and Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli — who are by no means medical experts — continue to interfere and force the Board of Health to advance regulations that undermine Virginia women’s rights and health. The controversy began last summer, when the governor and the attorney general pushed through “emergency regulations” that would have forced existing reproductive health clinics that provide abortion services to come into compliance with standards for newly constructed hospitals by 2013. The problem? There’s absolutely no medical reason for this requirement. The Virginia Board of Health’s advisory panel recognized this when it recommended its own regulations last year, which did not include the new construction standards that Virginia’s executive branch is pushing on reproductive health care providers. At a heated public meeting in June, the board refused to impose this ill-advised and draconian measure on existing clinics, amending the regulation to remove the new construction standards. A member of the attorney general’s staff tried to pressure members to fall in line, continuing the office’s full-court press against the members of the board by attempting to persuade them during a lunch break to change their votes on the amendment. The attorney general’s office failed, and the amendment stands — but then, Cuccinelli tried yet another underhanded tactic by refusing to “certify” the regulations that the Board of Health passed. The board must now reconsider its action. Throughout this process, it has become abundantly clear that Virginia’s executive branch is motivated not by concerns about health, but rather by a desire to make it impossible for doctors to provide the full range of reproductive health care. We’ve seen this in many other states across the country where politicians hostile to women’s constitutional right to reproductive choice are bent on regulating it out of existence. And make no mistake about it: Reproductive health care providers are the only medical professionals who are being subjected to this bullying campaign. Not a single other type of health care facility in Virginia has been forced to rebuild in compliance with the new hospital construction standards that the governor and attorney general are trying to impose on abortion clinics. In fact, a urologist testified in last month’s hearing that he routinely performs surgeries more complicated than abortion in his office-based practice, yet he has not been subjected to such harsh regulations. For some reason, the governor and attorney general seem dramatically less concerned about the health of these patients. Physicians, reproductive rights advocates, opponents of governmental overreach, and Virginia’s own panel of medical experts have all raised their voices to call out this hypocrisy — and they are far from alone. State and federal courts across the country — including, most recently, Missouri and Kansas — have moved to block comparably extreme abortion regulations from taking effect. In issuing the temporary restraining order that has kept the Kansas regulations from being enforced since last November, the state judge wrote that by forcing reproductive health care providers to shut down, it would “cause irreparable harm” to women seeking abortion services. The reproductive health care providers that Virginia’s executive branch insists on singling out have been safely caring for women in Virginia for decades, providing a range of vital reproductive and family health services of which abortion care is but one part. It is an important one: One in three American women will end a pregnancy at some point in their lives, and we need look no further than the dark days preceding Roe v. Wade to grasp the horrific consequences that women bear when safe and legal abortion services are unavailable. It is for this reason that these relentless attacks on abortion providers must be regarded as an attack on women’s health itself. And it is time for McDonnell and Cuccinelli to end their crusade to trample the rights of women and their doctors, and to allow the Virginia Board of Health — and critical health care providers statewide — to do the important work that Virginians have entrusted them to do.



Read and comment on this article on the Richmond Times-Dispatch website >,


Related Posts

Azar v. Garza Amicus Brief

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Complaint: Falls Church Healthcare Center et al. v. Norman Oliver et al.

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Amicus Brief: State of California et al. v. Alex M. Azar et al.

Other Barriers, Contraception,United States,In the Courts

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2023)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up