Latest News
تنظيم الأسرة من ألاسكا ضد الدولة v. آخر بري الابتدائية
المدعون في مرحلة ما بعد محاكمة قصيرة الأدلة المقدمة في المحاكمة تبين أن 24 بينالي الشارقة، الذي يمنع القاصرين دون 17 من ممارسة حقهم الدستوري في الحصول على الإجهاض إلا إذا كانت وحتى الحصول على [...]
Planned Parenthood of Alaska v. State: Plaintiffs’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE
Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic Consideration: Amicus brief (Slovak)
Úvod1. Tieto písomné pripomienky predkladá Centrum pre reprodukčné práva v New York City a Právna klinika medzinárodných ženských ľudských práv pri Právnickej fakulte City University v New Yorku v spolupráci so Slovenskou spoločnosťou pre plánované [...]
Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic Consideration: Amicus brief (English)
Introduction1. These written comments are submitted by the Center for Reproductive Rights and the International Women’s Human Rights Law Clinic at the City University of New York School of Law, in cooperation with the Slovak [...]
Stenberg v. Carhart: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Decision
Nebraska The State of Nebraska appeals a District Court 3 decision holding a Nebraska statute banning "partial-birth abortion" unconstitutional. The District Court permanently enjoined enforcement of the statute and awarded attorney's fees and costs to [...]
Stenberg v. Carhart: Nebraska’s Supreme Court brief
The Petitioners are Don Stenberg, Attorney General of the State of Nebraska, Gina Dunning, Director of Regulation and Licensure of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, and Charles Andrews, M.D., Chief Medical Officer [...]
Stenberg v. Carhart: CRR’s Supreme Court brief
QUESTIONS PRESENTED1. Whether the Nebraska partial-birth abortion statute violates women's right to privacy because it bans a broad range of abortion procedures, including the safest method of second-trimester abortion, without regard to fetal viability?2. Whether [...]
Stenberg v. Carhart: U.S. Supreme Court Decision
DON STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA, et al., PETITIONERS v. LEROY CARHARTNo. 99-830United States Supreme Court.Argued April 25, 2000Decided June 28, 2000
Reproductive rights are human rights.
Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: CRR’s Opposition to Petition for Rehearing En Banc
Pursuant to this Court’s order dated June 12, 2008, Plaintiffs-Appellees Richmond Medical Center for Women and William G. Fitzhugh, M.D. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) hereby respond to the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Defendants-Appellants Michael [...]
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: Virginia’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc
PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANCVirginia - 2008Virginia Attorney General Robert F. McDonnell, on behalf of Michael N. Herring, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, and Wade A. [...]
Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: Second Fourth Circuit Panel Decision
This case involves a facial challenge under the Fourteenth Amendment to a Virginia statute that attempts to criminalize "partial birth abortion," which the statute terms "partial birth infanticide." In a summary judgment order the district [...]
Tysiac v. Poland: Decision of the Court
PROCEDURE1. The case originated in an application (no. 5410/03) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) [...]
Tysiac v. Poland: CRR Amicus Brief
Introduction1. The Center for Reproductive Rights submits these written comments pursuant to leave granted by the President of the Chamber in accordance with Rule 44 § 2 and § 4 of the Rules of the [...]
Reproductive rights are human rights.
Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.