Latest News

Advanced Search

تنظيم الأسرة من ألاسكا ضد الدولة v. آخر بري الابتدائية

المدعون في مرحلة ما بعد محاكمة قصيرة الأدلة المقدمة في المحاكمة تبين أن 24 بينالي الشارقة، الذي يمنع القاصرين دون 17 من ممارسة حقهم الدستوري في الحصول على الإجهاض إلا إذا كانت وحتى الحصول على [...]

Abortion, Adolescent SRHR,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Planned Parenthood of Alaska v. State: Plaintiffs’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

Abortion, Adolescent SRHR,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic Consideration: Amicus brief (Slovak)

Úvod1. Tieto písomné pripomienky predkladá Centrum pre reprodukčné práva v New York City a Právna klinika medzinárodných ženských ľudských práv pri Právnickej fakulte City University v New Yorku v spolupráci so Slovenskou spoločnosťou pre plánované [...]

Europe, Slovakia,In the Courts,Case Document

Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic Consideration: Amicus brief (English)

Introduction1. These written comments are submitted by the Center for Reproductive Rights and the International Women’s Human Rights Law Clinic at the City University of New York School of Law, in cooperation with the Slovak [...]

Europe, Slovakia,In the Courts,Case Document

Stenberg v. Carhart: 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Decision

Nebraska The State of Nebraska appeals a District Court 3 decision holding a Nebraska statute banning "partial-birth abortion" unconstitutional. The District Court permanently enjoined enforcement of the statute and awarded attorney's fees and costs to [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Documents

Stenberg v. Carhart: Nebraska’s Supreme Court brief

The Petitioners are Don Stenberg, Attorney General of the State of Nebraska, Gina Dunning, Director of Regulation and Licensure of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, and Charles Andrews, M.D., Chief Medical Officer [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Stenberg v. Carhart: CRR’s Supreme Court brief

QUESTIONS PRESENTED1. Whether the Nebraska partial-birth abortion statute violates women's right to privacy because it bans a broad range of abortion procedures, including the safest method of second-trimester abortion, without regard to fetal viability?2. Whether [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Stenberg v. Carhart: U.S. Supreme Court Decision

DON STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA, et al., PETITIONERS v. LEROY CARHARTNo. 99-830United States Supreme Court.Argued April 25, 2000Decided June 28, 2000

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Documents

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: CRR’s Opposition to Petition for Rehearing En Banc

Pursuant to this Court’s order dated June 12, 2008, Plaintiffs-Appellees Richmond Medical Center for Women and William G. Fitzhugh, M.D. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) hereby respond to the petition for rehearing en banc filed by Defendants-Appellants Michael [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: Virginia’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc

PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANCVirginia - 2008Virginia Attorney General Robert F. McDonnell, on behalf of Michael N. Herring, in his official capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, and Wade A. [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Herring: Second Fourth Circuit Panel Decision

This case involves a facial challenge under the Fourteenth Amendment to a Virginia statute that attempts to criminalize "partial birth abortion," which the statute terms "partial birth infanticide." In a summary judgment order the district [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Documents

Tysiac v. Poland: Decision of the Court

PROCEDURE1. The case originated in an application (no. 5410/03) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) [...]

Europe, Poland,In the Courts,Documents

Tysiac v. Poland: CRR Amicus Brief

Introduction1. The Center for Reproductive Rights submits these written comments pursuant to leave granted by the President of the Chamber in accordance with Rule 44 § 2 and § 4 of the Rules of the [...]

Abortion,Europe, Poland, Accountability Bodies, European Human Rights System,In the Courts, Around the World,Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.