Latest News

Advanced Search

Amended Class Action Complaint: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey

The Center is challenging a newly enacted Texas law which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless her physician first performs an ultrasound, places the ultrasound images in her view, describes the images to [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care, Coercive Policies,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Center for Reproductive Rights Supplemental Testimony: HR 3 and HR 358

The Center for Reproductive Rights uses the law to advance reproductive freedom as a fundamental human right that all governments are legally obligated to protect, respect, and fulfill. Reproductive freedom lies at the heart of [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare,United States,Engaging Policymakers, In Washington D.C.,Case Document

Center for Reproductive Rights Testimony: H.R. 3

Center for Reproductive Rights Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures, Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives, March 16, 2011 The Center for Reproductive Rights uses the law to advance [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare,United States,Engaging Policymakers, In Washington D.C.,Case Document

Center for Reproductive Rights Supplemental Testimony: H.R. 3

Center for Reproductive Rights Supplemental Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures, Committee on Ways and Means, United States House of Representatives, March 30, 2011 The Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) submits the supplemental [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare,United States,Engaging Policymakers, In Washington D.C.,Case Document

CRR Testimony on H.R. 3 Before Committee on Ways and Means

Center for Reproductive Rights Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures, Committee on Ways and Means United States House of Representatives, March 16, 2011. The Center for Reproductive Rights uses the law to advance [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare,United States,Engaging Policymakers, In Washington D.C., Reporting on Rights,Case Document

Center for Reproductive Rights Testimony on H.R. 3 and H.R. 358

In this written testimony, we respond to arguments by anti-choice witnesses at the hearings before the Judiciary Committee‘s Subcommittee on the Constitution regarding H.R. 3 (the ―"No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act") and the Energy [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare,United States,Engaging Policymakers, In Washington D.C.,Case Document

Center for Reproductive Rights Testimony on “The Protect Life Act”

Written Testimony by the Center for Reproductive Rights before the United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health on “H.R., ___ the Protect Life Act” Chairman Pitts, Ranking Member Pallone, [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare,United States,Engaging Policymakers, In Washington D.C.,Case Document

O’Brien v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Notice of Appeal

O'Brien v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Notice of Appeal

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.