Latest News

Advanced Search

Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. et al. v. Brnovich, Christ, et al.: Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction

The Center for Reproductive rights has filed a lawsuit challenging an Arizona state law, SB 1318 (scheduled to take effect on July 3, 2015), which forces doctors to mislead patients by telling them that it [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions, Other Barriers, Biased Information, Censorship,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. et al. v. Brnovich, Christ, et al.: Complaint

The Center for Reproductive rights has filed a lawsuit challenging an Arizona state law, SB 1318 (scheduled to take effect on July 3, 2015), which forces doctors to mislead patients by telling them that it [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions, Other Barriers, Biased Information, Censorship,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Brief for the En Banc Court

Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Brief for the En Banc Court

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Petition for Rehearing En Banc

Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Petition for Rehearing En Banc

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

O’Brien v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Notice of Appeal

O'Brien v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Notice of Appeal

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Tummino v. Margaret Hamburg: Memo of Law in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Civil Contempt

Plaintiffs respectfully submit this memorandum of law in support of their motion for civil contempt against Defendant (hereinafter "the FDA") based on the FDA‟s failure to make any meaningful efforts to comply with the portion [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Other Barriers, Adolescent SRHR, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Legal Restrictions, Medical Education,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

O’Brien v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss

The Center for Reproductive Rights has joined the City of Baltimore to defend a first-in-the-nation ordinance that demands truth in advertising from limited-service pregnancy centers. Those centers, also known as crisis pregnancy centers, are non-medical [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

O’Brien v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Motion to Dismiss

The Center for Reproductive Rights has joined the City of Baltimore to defend a first-in-the-nation ordinance that demands truth in advertising from limited-service pregnancy centers. Those centers, also known as crisis pregnancy centers, are non-medical [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

O’Brien v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Complaint

The Center for Reproductive Rights has joined the City of Baltimore to defend a first-in-the-nation ordinance that demands truth in advertising from limited-service pregnancy centers. Those centers, also known as crisis pregnancy centers, are non-medical [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Hill v. Kemp: Complaint

Oklahoma The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma

Abortion, Biased Information, Censorship,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Supreme Court Declines to Review Oklahoma “Choose Life” License Plates Case

Statement from the Center for Reproductive Rights New York, NY - Yesterday, the Supreme Court declined to review Hill v. Kemp, a case which centers on a license plate program in Oklahoma which offers specialty [...]

Biased Information, Censorship,United States,In the Courts,News

Supreme Court Declines to Review Controversial Louisiana “Choose Life” License Plates Case

Statement from Nancy Northup, President of the Center for Reproductive Rights Today, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review Keeler v. Stalder, a case that looked at whether states may issue specialty license plates with [...]

Biased Information, Censorship,United States,In the Courts,News

Discriminatory Oklahoma Law Put on Hold: State Agrees Not to Distribute “Choose Life” License Plate Proceeds

Tulsa State officials agreed not to distribute the proceeds from Oklahoma's "Choose Life" specialty license plates to anti-choice pregnancy counseling centers until July 1, 2005. The agreement was reached in connection with a lawsuit brought [...]

Biased Information, Censorship,United States,In the Courts,News

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.