Center for Reproductive Rights
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Whole Woman’s Health v. Phillips

Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate
Work Issues Regions Types Year
In the Courts At the United Nations Engaging Policymakers Around the World In the States (USA) In Washington D.C. U.S. Administrative Advocacy U.S. Congressional Advocacy Reporting on Rights
Abortion Anti-Choice Harassment Definitions Legal Protections Legal Restrictions Other Barriers Adolescent SRHR Female Genital Mutilation Sex Education Assisted Reproduction Embryo Personhood and Custody IVF Surrogacy Biased Information Censorship Contraception Emergency Contraception Legal Protections Legal Restrictions COVID-19 Funding for Reproductive Healthcare Other Financial Barriers Public Funding Global Gag Rule HIV/AIDS Discriminatory Policies Right to Care Humanitarian Settings Maternal Health Access to Quality Care Coercive Policies Maternal Mortality Medical Education SRHR General
Germany United Kingdom Wales England Africa Benin Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Côte d'Ivoire Ethiopia Ghana Kenya Malawi Mali Nigeria Rwanda South Africa Uganda Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe Senegal Asia China Bangladesh India Malaysia Nepal Pakistan Philippines Sri Lanka Thailand Vietnam Bulgaria Europe Croatia Czech Republic France Hungary Lithuania Ireland Albania Malta Moldova Northern Ireland Poland Romania Russia Slovakia Spain Ukraine Latin America & Caribbean Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Ecuador El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Jamaica Mexico Nicaragua Peru Uruguay United States Global Accountability Bodies African Human Rights System Inter-American Human Rights System European Human Rights System United Nations
Case Case Document Court Filings Court Opinions & Orders Testimony Complaint Documents Briefing Papers Legal Analyses Other Shadow Letters & Reports UN Concluding Observations Events News Center in the Spotlight Press Releases Statement Story US Repro Watch Publications Books & Reports Fact Sheets Newsletter Resources Uncategorized
2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1970
Selected Court Filings 2016
Advanced Search
Work
Issues
Regions
Types
Year
Selected Court Filings 2016

June Medical Services v. Gee: Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

June Medical Services LLC v. Gee: Complaint

Abortion, Legal Restrictions, Other Barriers,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Gainesville Woman Care LLC v. Florida: Bioethicists Amicus Brief

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,In the Courts,Case Document

Gainesville Woman Care LLC v. Florida: NAF Amicus Brief

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,In the Courts,Case Document

Hodes & Nauser v. Schmidt: Kansas Supreme Court Brief for Amicus Curiae ACOG in Support of Plaintiffs

Hodes &, Nauser v. Schmidt: Kansas Supreme Court Brief for Amicus Curiae ACOG in Support of Plaintiffs

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Gainesville Woman Care LLC v. Florida: Amicus Brief of Experts and Organizations Supporting Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Assault, and Trafficking

           

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,In the Courts,Case Document

Hodes & Nauser v. Schmidt: Kansas Supreme Court, Respondents’ Supplemental Brief

Hodes &, Nauser v. Schmidt: Kansas Supreme Court, Respondents' Supplemental Brief

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Gainesville Woman Care LLC d/b/a Bread and Roses Women’s Health Center, et al. v. State of Florida, et al.: Plaintiffs-Petitioners’ Initial Brief on the Merits

The Plaintiffs-Petitioners' Initial Brief on the Merits filed with the Florida Supreme Court in Gainesville Woman Care LLC d/b/a Bread and Roses Women's Health Center, et al. v. State of Florida, et al.

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Give Today

Planned Parenthood Arizona v. Brnovich et. al.: Notice of Appeal

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Burns v. Cline: Motion That Appeal be Retained for Disposition by Supreme Court

The Motion filed by the Plaintiff that the Oklahoma Supreme Court accept an appeal of the trial court's decision.

Abortion,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Burns v. Cline: Motion to Retain

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Burns v. Cline: Petition In Error

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Gainesville Woman Care LLC d/b/a Bread and Roses Women’s Health Center, et al. v. State of Florida, et al.: Motion to Review Order Denying Emergency Motion to Stay

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document
Previous
Next

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Give Now