Latest News

Advanced Search

MKB v Burdick Order 02_16_2012

This case challenges provisions of North Dakota House Bill 1297, passed during the 2011 legislative session, which would effectively ban all medication abortions in the state by requiring compliance with conditions for the provision of [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), Reporting on Rights,Case Document

Plaintiffs-Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction: Hodes & Nauser, MDs, P.A. et al. v. Robert Moser, M.D et al.

This case challenges the constitutionality of onerous temporary regulations and a sham licensing process adopted and implemented by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) that will cause most of the abortion providers in [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Intervene by AAPLOG: Hodes & Nauser, MDs, P.A. et al. v. Robert Moser, M.D et al.

This case challenges the constitutionality of onerous temporary regulations and a sham licensing process adopted and implemented by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) that will cause most of the abortion providers in [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Memo of Support: MKB Management Corp d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic, Kathryn Eggleston, M.D., v. Birch Burdick and Terry Dwelle, M.D.

This case challenges provisions of North Dakota House Bill 1297, passed during the 2011 legislative session, which would effectively ban all medication abortions in the state by requiring compliance with conditions for the provision of [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), Reporting on Rights,Case Document

Complaint: MKB Management Corp d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic, Kathryn Eggleston, M.D., v. Birch Burdick and Terry Dwelle, M.D.

This case challenges provisions of North Dakota House Bill 1297, passed during the 2011 legislative session, which would effectively ban all medication abortions in the state by requiring compliance with conditions for the provision of [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), Reporting on Rights,Case Document

Appendix of Facts Supporting Plaintiffs’ Motion for PI: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey

The Center is challenging a newly enacted Texas law which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless her physician first performs an ultrasound, places the ultrasound images in her view, describes the images to [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injuction: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey

The Center is challenging a newly enacted Texas law which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless her physician first performs an ultrasound, places the ultrasound images in her view, describes the images to [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Complaint: Hodes & Nauser, MDs, P.A. et al. v. Robert Moser, M.D et al.

This case challenges the constitutionality of onerous temporary regulations and a sham licensing process adopted and implemented by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) that will cause most of the abortion providers in [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Exhibit 1 to Amended Complaint—House Bill 15: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey

The Center is challenging a newly enacted Texas law which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless her physician first performs an ultrasound, places the ultrasound images in her view, describes the images to [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care, Coercive Policies,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Amended Class Action Complaint: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey

The Center is challenging a newly enacted Texas law which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless her physician first performs an ultrasound, places the ultrasound images in her view, describes the images to [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care, Coercive Policies,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Poland: A Victory of Firsts

For the first time in its history, the European Court of Human Rights specifically found that an abortion-related violation amounted to inhumane and degrading treatment. The Center and its partners filed the case R.R. v. Poland [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,Europe, Poland, Accountability Bodies, European Human Rights System,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, Around the World, Reporting on Rights,News

The “Protect Life Act”: Allowing Hospitals to Ignore Women

On Wednesday, February 9, the Energy and Commerce Committee will hear testimony on Rep. Joe Pitts' "Protect Life Act" (H.R. 358). The Pitts bill would prevent women from using their own money to buy abortion coverage, effectively stripping millions of women [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare,United States,Engaging Policymakers, In Washington D.C.,News

O’Brien v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Notice of Appeal

O'Brien v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Notice of Appeal

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.