Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • #TheForwardFight
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

North Carolina’s “RBG Act” Would Remove State Barriers to Abortion Care

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • #TheForwardFight
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion

Regions:

United States

Work:

Engaging Policymakers

Type:

News, Story

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

03.11.2021

Engaging Policymakers Abortion United States News

North Carolina’s “RBG Act” Would Remove State Barriers to Abortion Care

Justin Goldberg
Center Joins Town Hall with Lawmakers and Advocates to Discuss New Proposal

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg hugging man

Decades of attacks on reproductive rights and health care access by state legislators have made abortion care difficult to access in North Carolina, with the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbating existing barriers. A proposed new state law would remove several of those barriers.  

The new law, called the Removing Barriers to Gain Access to Abortion Act (“RBG Act”) in honor of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, was introduced on March 1 by members of the North Carolina General Assembly, including Representative Julie von Haefen, Senator Natasha Marcus, and Senator Jay Chaudhuri. HB 188 and SB 167 would eliminate medically unnecessary and arbitrary restrictions that have limited access to reproductive health care in North Carolina for many years.  

The Center for Reproductive Rights joined North Carolina lawmakers and advocates at a March 2 town hall forum to discuss the proposed new law. 

The RBG Act would repeal the state’s biased counseling requirement, 72-hour delay before a patient may access abortion care, ban on telemedicine for abortion care, and bans prohibiting abortion coverage in state and private health plans. The bill would also allow advanced practice clinicians to provide abortion care within their scope of practice.  

At the forum, which was moderated by North Carolina State Representative Deborah Butler and State Senator Natalie Murdock, the RBG Act was discussed in the context of North Carolina’s numerous abortion restrictions—many of which are being challenged by the Center and its partners in court—as well as its overall health policies.  

Nimra Chowdhry, State Legislative Counsel at the Center, cited findings from Evaluating Priorities, an online resource by the Center and Ibis Reproductive Health, comparing states’ anti-abortion laws and policies with those supporting the health and well-being of pregnant people, children, and families.  

“Repealing harmful abortion restrictions through the RBG Act would represent a step in the right direction for North Carolina,” said Chowdhry. “Despite numerous restrictions on abortion, North Carolina only has three of the seven policies considered in the Evaluating Priorities research supportive of pregnant people. In addition to removing restrictions, more supportive policies must be enacted.”  

The findings in Evaluating Priorities show a national trend: The more abortion restrictions in a state, the fewer evidence-based supportive health policies. While policymakers who support abortion restrictions claim that they want to protect the health and safety of women, these findings suggest otherwise.  

North Carolina has passed 15 of the 18 abortion restrictions included in the analysis yet enacted only 12 of the 25 supportive health policies. The state has the fourth highest number of abortion restrictions in the country, along with Alabama, Michigan, South Dakota, Tennessee and Utah.  

At the forum, Amber Gavin spoke on behalf of A Woman’s Choice clinics and emphasized the impact that these restrictions have on patients accessing abortion care in the state. She noted that the pandemic has had drastic financial impacts on their patients and that many patients have had to delay their procedures to gather necessary funds. In addition, the ban on telemedicine has prevented the clinic from providing care that maximizes social distancing for patients and staff.  

Also joining the forum were Liz Barber of the ACLU of North Carolina, Susanna Birdsong of Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, Mars Earle of the Carolina Abortion Fund, and Tara Romano of NARAL Pro-Choice NC. 

Find out more: 

  • Remove Barriers/Gain Access to Abortion Act (Bill text)
  • Evaluating Priorities: Evaluating Abortion Restrictions and Supportive Policies Across the U.S.

Tags: RBG

Related Posts

Game Changer

What does our historic win at the Supreme Court mean for abortion access? Stephanie Toti, lead attorney in the case,...

Abortion, Legal Protections, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA)
Game Changer

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Gets It

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Gets It If she wasn’t your hero already, take a look at the interview Justice Ginsburg gave...

Abortion, Contraception, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare, Maternal Health,United States,Engaging Policymakers, Reporting on Rights
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Gets It

Strong Voices for Our Rights

Sponsors and supporters of the Women’s Health Protection Act explain why WHPA now At the reintroduction of the Women’s Health...

Abortion,United States,Engaging Policymakers
Strong Voices for Our Rights

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2023)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up