Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

New Study: Most Oklahoma Hospitals Unable to Explain Their Policies on Emergency Abortion Care

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion

Regions:

United States

Work:

Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA)

Type:

News, Press Releases

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

04.25.2023

Engaging Policymakers Abortion United States Press Releases

New Study: Most Oklahoma Hospitals Unable to Explain Their Policies on Emergency Abortion Care

Tharanga Yakupitiyage
New report paints an alarming picture of pregnant Oklahomans’ inability to receive clear information on how they will be treated at hospitals if they experience dangerous pregnancy complications

Share

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id

04.25.23 (PRESS RELEASE) — Not a single hospital in Oklahoma appears able to articulate clear, consistent policies for emergency obstetric care to pregnant patients, according to a new study published Tuesday. When called by prospective patients, Oklahoma hospitals offered opaque, contradictory, and incorrect information about abortion availability and approval processes in obstetric emergencies, as well as little reassurance that clinicians’ medical judgment and pregnant patients’ needs would be prioritized.

Using a “simulated patient” methodology, researchers called all Oklahoma hospitals that provide prenatal and peripartum care to ask questions related to emergency pregnancy care. Among the 34 Oklahoma hospitals reached by prospective patients:

  • 65 percent (22 hospitals) were unable to provide information about procedures, policies, or support provided to doctors when it is clinically necessary to terminate a pregnancy to save the life of a pregnant patient.
  • Only two of the 34 hospitals described providing legal support for clinicians in such situations.
  • In 14 cases (41 percent), hospital representatives provided unclear and/or incomplete answers about whether doctors require approval to perform a medically necessary abortion.
  • Four hospitals stated they have formal approval processes that clinicians must go through if they deem it medically necessary to terminate a pregnancy.
  • Three hospitals indicated that they have policies for these situations but refused to share any information about them.
  • Three representatives stated that their hospitals do not provide abortions at all, despite abortion remaining legal in the cases of medical emergencies or to “preserve the life” of the pregnant person.
  • Four hospitals provided information that was factually wrong.  

Oklahoma hospitals that are affiliated with an Indigenous nation were excluded from the study; because they operate under federal oversight, it is unclear how the Oklahoma bans impact them.

In conversations with hospital staff and clinicians, researchers received a range of misleading, unclear, and even factually incorrect answers about emergency pregnancy care available at the facilities, such as:

  • “If the situation is truly life-threatening, decisions will be made,” said one Oklahoma hospital representative, without explaining how those decisions would be made or by whom.
  • In one circumstance, hospital representatives told the caller that the pregnant patient’s body would be used as an “incubator” to carry the baby as long as possible.
  • “It is tricky because of state laws, but we will not let the mom die,” said another hospital representative. 
  • At one hospital, a staff member put the simulated caller on hold and, after consulting with a hospital physician, told the caller, “Nowhere in the state of Oklahoma can you get an abortion for any reason,” even though the bans have exceptions.

No One Could Say: Accessing Emergency Obstetrics Information as a Prospective Prenatal Patient in Post-Roe Oklahoma highlights how the state’s abortion bans fuel confusion about clinicians’ ability to provide abortion care to save a pregnant patient’s life during obstetric emergencies without punishment. The report findings raise grave concerns about the ability of a pregnant person in Oklahoma – and in the other 11 U.S. states with similar abortion bans – to receive clear, sufficient, and necessary information to make informed decisions about their medical care and treatment in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade. 

The report – the first study of its kind – is jointly published by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR), Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice (OCRJ), and the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR). All three human rights organizations are calling on the Oklahoma legislature to repeal Oklahoma’s abortion bans and decriminalize abortion. 

The report co-authors also simultaneously published a Comment in leading medical journal The Lancet about the impacts of abortion bans, titled “US abortion bans violate patients’ right to information and to health.”

Oklahoma residents currently live under three overlapping abortion bans, which impose severe civil and criminal penalties on health care professionals who violate them. The situation in Oklahoma offers important insight into the effects of total abortion bans on pregnant patients and the clinicians who care for them in all 12 states with such bans.

“The laws criminalizing abortion in Oklahoma place both patients and providers in an untenable situation,” said Michele Heisler, MD, MPA, report co-author, medical director at PHR, and professor of internal medicine and public health at University of Michigan. “Oklahoma hospitals and medical professionals have been thrust into a crisis of ‘dual loyalty,’ where they have to abide by punitive laws that can harm patients while seeking to provide ethical, high-quality, patient-centered medical care.” 

“Our report found that prospective patients were not able to access even basic information about the emergency care they might receive during pregnancy,” said Dr. Heisler. “These findings should be a wake-up call to health professionals everywhere to speak out against laws criminalizing abortion, which jeopardize clinicians’ medical decision-making to prioritize their patients’ health, well-being, and human rights.”

“Oklahoma’s abortion bans threaten the lives and health of pregnant Oklahomans. We know that this callous, intentional disregard for pregnant people from the state’s elected leaders will disproportionately harm those who already face discrimination in accessing medical care, including Black, Indigenous, and other Oklahomans of color, young people, and people living on low-incomes,” said Tamya Cox-Touré, chair, Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice. “It is preposterous that the State can force people to sacrifice their health and lives. We hope that these powerful research findings will help lead to the removal of these dangerous barriers to safe and quality healthcare for pregnant people. We ask all Oklahomans and their health care providers to speak out against the serious harms caused by Oklahoma’s abortion bans. Let this report inspire action because we need everyone in this fight.”

“This report is a stunning indictment of post-Roe medical care for pregnant people. Oklahoma’s extreme and inconsistent abortion bans put peoples’ health and lives at risk every day,” said Risa Kaufman, director of U.S. human rights at the Center for Reproductive Rights, which has legal challenges pending against abortion bans and restrictions in 10 states, including two in Oklahoma. “These devastating findings from Oklahoma are consistent with accounts we are hearing from patients and health care professionals in other abortion ban states. These bans undermine the ability and freedom of patients and their providers to make safe, evidence-based health care decisions.”

The U.S. medical community has largely condemned the wave of abortion criminalization laws sweeping across parts of the country, with American Medical Association president Jack Resneck, Jr. saying that physicians are now “caught between good medicine and bad law,” struggling to “meet their ethical duties to patients’ health and well-being, while attempting to comply with reckless government interference in the practice of medicine that is dangerous to the health of… patients.”

Pregnant people who live in a state that has banned abortion are up to three times more likely to die during pregnancy, childbirth, or soon after giving birth compared to pregnant people in states that do not ban abortion, according to a January 2023 study by the Gender Equity Policy Institute. 

In light of these stark findings, PHR, OCRJ, and CRR call on the Oklahoma legislature to repeal Oklahoma’s abortion bans and decriminalize abortion. The organizations also call on the state to ensure that health care services for pregnant people and all Oklahomans are accessible and of good quality. Critically, the organizations also urge Oklahoma’s hospitals and clinicians – as well as state and national medical associations – to speak out against laws criminalizing abortion or otherwise restricting access to abortions, including during obstetric emergencies.

The organizations also call for national lawmakers to pass legislation recognizing the right to abortion and for the federal administration to take steps to ensure access to abortion in all states, without discrimination.

###

MEDIA CONTACTS:

PHR: [email protected]; +1-917-679-0110

OCRJ: [email protected] 

Center for Reproductive Rights: [email protected] 

Related Posts

Complaint: Medical Students for Choice vs. Wright

Abortion,United States, Accountability Bodies,Engaging Policymakers

Testimony of the Center for Reproductive Rights on the Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson Proposal

The Center for Reproductive Rights respectfully submits the following testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance in strong opposition...

Abortion, Legal Restrictions, Other Barriers, Contraception, Legal Restrictions, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare, Other Financial Barriers, Right to Care, Maternal Health,United States,Engaging Policymakers

June Medical Services v. Gee: Petition for Attorney’s Fees

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA)

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2024)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Better Business Bureau Charity Watch Top Rated Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up