Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

New Report: Slovak Women Struggle to Buy Birth Control

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Type:

News, Story

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

03.14.2011

News

New Report: Slovak Women Struggle to Buy Birth Control

Justin Goldberg

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/hp_calcinjustice.jpg

For too many Slovak women, modern contraceptives remain tragically out of reach, according to a new report released by the Center and its partners Freedom of Choice Slovakia and Citizen, Democracy, and Accountability.



Contraception is critical to a woman’s ability to prevent unintended pregnancy and make some of the most basic decisions about her health and life. It’s not surprising then that international health and human rights standards require governments to make modern contraceptives affordable and accessible. 




Calculated Injustice Download Calculated Injustice >,



Executive Summary >,



Methodology and Structure of the Report >, 



The Right to Contraceptive Services and Information >,



Lack of Contraceptive Coverage >,



Low Contraceptive Use and Gaps Between European Union Countries >,



Lack of Comprehensive Data on Reproductive Health Indicators >,



Comparing European Countries’ Subsidizations and Their Justifications:



Unaffordability >,



Other Structural Barriers >, Recommendations >, Conclusions >,




But unlike most other European Union countries, Slovakia does not help women pay for contraceptives. As a result, high costs deter many women from using contraception.



“If there is no money, then I only have one option: that I will not take contraceptives,” said Maria, a 19-year-old student. As we discovered while researching the report, low-income women are often forced to make a choice between feeding their families and buying contraceptives.



But instead of addressing the problem, the Slovak Ministry of Health is currently planning to exclude contraceptives from being covered by public health insurance.



Calculated Injustice: The Slovak Republic’s Failure to Ensure Access to Contraceptives documents the problems women and adolescent girls in Slovakia face because they lack access to affordable contraception. The Center gathered testimonies from women, healthcare providers, pharmacists, and other stakeholders.



We are using the report’s findings to urge the Slovak government to guarantee access to a wide range of affordable contraceptives and make sure they are covered by public health insurance just like any other essential drug.



 



The Right to Contraceptive Services and Information



International human rights law requires states to provide women with access to a full range of sexual and reproductive health services, which includes making acceptable and affordable contraceptive methods available. It also includes providing sufficient and appropriate information on those methods. These obligations are grounded in numerous internationally recognized human rights, including the rights to equality and nondiscrimination, the right to privacy, the right to decide the number and spacing of children, and the right to health. The UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ESCR) has made clear that the right to health encompasses the right to sexual and reproductive health, which obligates states to ensure affordable access to contraceptives and family planning information. The Committee has explicitly stated that all drugs on the World Health Organization (WHO) Model List of Essential Medicines, which includes contraceptives and emergency contraception, should be made accessible to all. It has also expressed the view that lack of access to contraception and to sexuality education are violations of the right to health. States thus have an obligation to provide all women with access to affordable, acceptable, and good-quality contraceptives. At the regional level, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE)—the representative body of Europe’s human rights system, the Council of Europe—adopted a resolution in 2008 urging states to make contraceptives accessible and affordable, as well as ensure sexuality education in schools in order to prevent unwanted pregnancies and avoidable abortions. Moreover, denying access to services that only women need violates their fundamental rights to equality and non-discrimination—hallmark principles of international human rights law enshrined in major regional and international treaties. Regional and international human rights standards pay special attention to marginalized women—for example, poor women, women in rural areas, and young women—regarding information on and access to contraceptives. In addition, to ensure that states are fulfilling their human rights obligations, regional and international legal instruments underscore the importance of data collection on women’s status, health indicators, and education, disaggregated by relevant grounds, including gender, age, and ethnicity. Governments have clear international human rights obligations—as well as compelling economic, social, and public health reasons—to ensure women’s access to affordable and acceptable contraceptives and information and to collect data on the realization of those obligations. However, the Slovak government has largely ignored these obligations and policy justifications. The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW Committee) recognized this failure in 2008 when it emphasized that family planning services in Slovakia, of which contraceptives form an integral part, fell short of what is required under international law. The Committee urged the government “to take measures to increase the access of women and adolescent girls to affordable . . . reproductive healthcare, and to increase access to information and affordable means of family planning. . . .” The findings of this report bolster the CEDAW Committee’s observations and reveal that women in Slovakia face significant barriers to accessing contraceptives.



Return to top



Lack of Contraceptive Coverage



With the exception of emergency contraception, which is available over the counter, female hormonal contraception can be obtained only by prescription from a gynecologist, whom women may visit without a referral from a primary care physician. Such contraception includes pills, patches, injectables, vaginal rings, and implants. Slovakia’s public health insurance scheme, which is mandatory for the entire population, does not cover hormonal contraceptives, thus requiring women to pay for these items out of pocket. This policy exists despite the fact that Slovakia’s abortion law seeks to prevent unintended pregnancy by requiring that prescription contraceptives “be provided to a woman free of charge.” Furthermore, Slovakia’s requirements for including a drug on the list of medicinal products covered by public health insurance include the drug’s life-saving, curative, or preventative qualities. The only insured contraceptive method is surgical sterilization, which is permanent and irreversible and covered only when there are health indications. Therefore, women to whom pregnancy poses a health risk are given no other option under health insurance besides sterilization. The state also does not subsidize emergency contraception in any way.



Return to top  



Low Contraceptive Use and Gaps Between European Union Countries



Contraceptive use in Slovakia has improved since the early 1990s, when only 2.2% of women of reproductive age were using hormonal contraception. In 2008, the percentage increased tenfold to 22.3%. Yet, this figure remains low in comparison with other EU countries. In neighboring Czech Republic, 47.4% of women of reproductive age were using hormonal contraception in 2008. In France, 43.8% of women were using the pill in 2009, and use of contraceptive pills in Germany is among the highest in the world, at over 50%. When comparing overall data from the new European Union (EU) Member States of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) to that of older EU Member States, serious gaps emerge. Prevalence of modern methods (including not just hormonal contraceptives, but also IUDs, female sterilization, and male condoms) stands at 36% in some countries of the CEE region—namely, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia, which are all new EU Member States. This is nearly twice as low as in Western European countries, where the prevalence is on average 71%. For example, 28% of women in Poland and 40% of women in Bulgaria are using modern contraceptives, compared to 77% and 82% of women in France and the United Kingdom, respectively. This disparity indicates that contraceptive use is an issue worthy of attention across Europe. Return to top



Lack of Comprehensive Data on Reproductive Health Indicators



Like many other governments in the CEE region, the Slovak government does not gather comprehensive data on reproductive health indicators, such as unintended pregnancies, contraceptive use, and the unmet need for contraception. The limited data that the state gathers on the prevalence of just a few contraceptive methods—namely, hormonal contraception and IUDs—is insufficient for understanding the reasons behind low usage rates in Slovakia. As a result, it is difficult to effectively identify measures that should be taken to meet the contraceptive needs of women and adolescent girls. Furthermore, public officials are able to remain unaccountable for neglecting to adequately address the health needs of the public due to their own failure to collect adequate and reliable data.



Return to top  



Comparing European Countries’ Subsidizations and Their Justifications



Slovakia is not the only EU country in which the high price of contraceptives is a barrier to access, in other new Member States, it is a problem as well. To effectively deal with this issue, state subsidization of reproductive healthcare services in the form of basic public health insurance is widely considered an appropriate measure. Of the twenty seven EU Member States, eighteen include contraceptives in their public health insurance package as a means to prevent pregnancy without there having to be an underlying health condition. Those states either fully or partially subsidize some hormonal contraceptive methods for all women, for low-income women, or for women under a certain age. However, the remaining nine EU Member States do not provide subsidies for hormonal contraceptives, despite their inclusion on the WHO’s essential medicines list. All but one of these nine countries are new Member States, among them Slovakia. Some of those same countries, including Slovakia, also either do not have national strategies for ensuring access to reproductive healthcare services or do not have effective strategies for making contraceptives affordable. EU Member States that subsidize contraceptives do so on public health grounds or to uphold fundamental rights. The Slovenian government, for example, considers family planning a fundamental human right guaranteed by the Constitution, which grants all citizens the right to determine whether to bear children. In Poland, while the Ombudsman for Human Rights found the withdrawal of subsidies for contraceptives to constitute discrimination on the ground of sex,the government has failed to reinstitute their subsidization. The Belgian Constitutional Court, in addressing the constitutionality of the law on pricing for pharmaceuticals, stated generally that the pricing scheme aims to improve access to drugs that promote public health and social benefits. The Court noted that contraceptives are a type of drug that must be accessible to the public at an affordable price. It explained that providing access to them is justifiable on the grounds of public health and social protection in order to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies. Similarly, the Danish government considers family planning services, including subsidization of contraception, “an integral part of the national health service.” In France, research conducted by public authorities on the use of various oral contraceptives indicated that contraceptive subsidies “present an interest in terms of public health.”Also espousing the public health argument, the United Kingdom’s National Health Service Act mandates that contraceptives be available free of charge to “cut down the number of unwanted pregnancies and . . .decrease the number of abortions.” Return to top  



Unaffordability



When asked whether she offers patients different contraceptive options, Dr. Elena Molnárová, a gynecologist, responded:



I tell [a woman] about the possibilities and she tells me her financial limit. I tell her what I think is the best and most suitable for her, but the crucial thing is what she can afford. It has happened to me that a patient wanted to take more expensive contraception and she didn’t buy it because she couldn’t afford it, and she got pregnant.



Beáta, a 40-year-old mother of two, noted that of her approximately 30 female acquaintances, only one is using modern contraception. She explained why this figure is so low:



I think the main reason is first and foremost financial, that they cannot afford it. Simply in the case of some of my acquaintances or friends it’s either that she doesn’t work or her husband doesn’t work, they have two to three children, it is a problem to [get by], you understand. So I think it is a financial problem.



Ms. Vargová, a pharmacist, has noted that emergency contraception is prohibitively expensive (€22) for young women, particularly students, who lack income. She noted that when some of her customers see the price of emergency contraception, they realize that they cannot afford it and purchase a pregnancy test instead.



Ms. Apolónia Sejková, director of the NGO, MYMAMY, which provides support to women subjected to male violence, explained the following:



Abused women have complained about [their husbands not giving them money for] contraception. It is on the list of things that they do not have buying power after the abuse starts. . . . It is true that abusing men often use conception of more and more children for stronger control and for restricting the partner. In the socioeconomic situation most of our clients are in, and in general most of the average population of Eastern Slovakia, it is difficult to [come up with] any solution. If you have four or five children, no income, live in the house that belongs to the husband or his family, . . . [it is] difficult to leave the husband. Many women therefore stay in violent relationships because they take it as at least they have basic living needs covered and they rather stand to be hit or humiliated . . . they feel that it is the only way for their survival. Return to top  



Other Structural Barriers



Klaudia, a 36-year-old mother of one, said that daughters of her Catholic friends go to meetings with Salesians, a Roman Catholic religious order, where they also receive information on contraception. However, the information provided is one sided, focusing on natural family planning and the negative side effects of hormonal contraception. Speaking about the Catholic Church hierarchy’s influence on women’s contraceptive use, Iveta, mentioned above, observed with apparent sarcasm: “The church gives [women] a great option: don’t use withdrawal, don’t use contraception, bring up your child on your own, and don’t go for abortion. And that is really great, really great.”



According to Ms. Olga Pietruchová, executive director of the Slovak Family Planning Association, access to contraception is impeded by conservative Catholic groups and individuals who spread half-truths and demonize contraception: Ideologically-based groups . . . have a big influence on power, either through the Catholic Church hierarchy or through some political parties. . . These groups, which include some NGOs and doctors, run negative campaigns, primarily against hormonal contraception by pointing to its negative side effects. But the information [they provide] is partial, they say one thing but don’t say the rest. They always talk about negatives [and] this dominates the public discussion.” According to Dr. Molnárová, the lack of access to contraceptives has to do with the way schools provide sexuality education: “[N]owadays, at many secondary schools there is sexual education, which is taught by catechists, or people who are from different parishes, and [their] explanation of this area is pronouncedly onesided. . . . We still have a problem [establishing] sexual education within the framework of classes at school. It’s still more or less up to biology teachers. In fact, it depends on the professor’s view in what direction it all goes.” Ms. Pietruchová of the Slovak Family Planning Association also cited lack of adequate sexuality education as a problem: “Sex education—that is, “Education for Marriage and Parenthood”—is not a mandatory subject, but if the school chooses to teach it, it should do it according to [official school] guidelines [set by the Ministry of Education]. However, these guidelines are very general, anything can be included under the topics addressed. Moreover, the name of the subject itself—“Education for Marriage and Parenthood”—is sick.”



Return to top  


Related Posts

Azar v. Garza Amicus Brief

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Complaint: Falls Church Healthcare Center et al. v. Norman Oliver et al.

Abortion,United States,In the Courts

Amicus Brief: State of California et al. v. Alex M. Azar et al.

Other Barriers, Contraception,United States,In the Courts

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2022)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up