Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • What if Roe Fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • What if Roe Fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map
    • Take Action Toolkit
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal
Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • What if Roe Fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • What if Roe Fell? U.S. Abortion Laws Map
    • Take Action Toolkit
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Funding for Reproductive Healthcare

Regions:

United States

Work:

Reporting on Rights

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

  • Hidden

09.22.2010

Reporting on Rights Abortion United States

Members of Congress Speak Out Against the “Status Quo,” Following Healthcare Debate

Justin Goldberg

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
Center Releases Report of Hyde’s Real-life Stories, Finds Policy “Just Wrong”

Today, members of the House of Representatives joined the Center for Reproductive Rights in releasing a new report documenting the real-life impact of the Hyde Amendment on poor women. Hyde prohibits federal funds from being used for abortion except under limited circumstances. During the healthcare debate, the amendment was represented as sound policy and as the accepted standard for laws around public funding for abortion. But through the stories of women adversely affected by Hyde, Whose Choice? How the Hyde Amendment Harms Poor Women refutes that position.“Hyde may have played politically during the healthcare debate, but our report illustrates that in the real world, it’s just wrong,” said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights. “Women enroll in Medicaid because they can’t afford most healthcare, including abortion services. Hyde not only cruelly targets poor women, it forces reproductive choices on them and that’s a violation of their basic rights.” The Center, joined by Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), and Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL), unveiled the report at a briefing on Capitol Hill. The research comes as Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) circulates a bill seeking to codify Hyde and create a host of punishing new tax penalties designed to make coverage of abortion services unavailable in private insurance policies. The Center’s report concludes that funding restrictions deprive women of the ability to do what’s best for their health, themselves and their families. They saddle women with additional financial hardship, cause unreasonable delays in their access to abortion and ultimately, interfere with their ability to decide the appropriate choices for their own personal circumstances. “One of the primary obstacles to equal access to healthcare for women, the Hyde Amendment, is something policymakers have become used to, but that I simply cannot and will not accept,” said Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO). “It treats poor women differently than women of means, placing the dignity of being able to make their most personal choice about their body and their family out of reach.  I hope that soon we can offer all women, regardless of wealth or social status, the equal opportunity afforded by the Constitution.””In case there was still any doubt, this report demonstrates clearly that the Hyde Amendment has had a destructive impact on a woman’s right to make her own health decisions,” said Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY). “Access to healthcare is a universal human right, and low-income women in America are more likely to be at a disadvantage when it comes to paying for abortions. The healthcare legislation did not improve on this unfortunate reality.”The research is a snapshot of the harm inflicted by Hyde and centers around a group of poor women from across the country who sought an abortion within the last twelve months. Some narratives in the report read as follows (names are changed to pseudonyms to protect women’s identities):



  • C.M., a 26-year-old single mother from Georgia and Iraq war vet, recently broke up with the father of her six-year-old son, after trying to make it work. She had been diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder after her tour in Iraq and on top of the financial strain and absence of a partner, she did not feel she was emotionally ready to care for another child. With a monthly income of $1700 and bills totaling $800-$900, it took her six weeks and several cancelled appointments to save the money for an abortion. By the time she had saved the money and postponed paying several bills, she had to have a second-trimester procedure and the abortion cost her $1500.

  • R.D., a 27-year-old mother of two who lives in Kentucky works part-time at a non-profit that advocates for businesses and goes to school full-time to get her associates degree. Last year, she found out that she was pregnant shortly after breaking up with the man she’d been in a relationship with for eight years and who is father of her children. She and her ex decided that financially they couldn’t take care of another child. At the time, she was only making $300 every two weeks and all of her financial aid went towards her tuition. She was enrolled in Medicaid and receiving food stamps. She couldn’t even afford the initial $200 visit to Planned Parenthood. So was forced to schedule and cancel several appointments as she raised the necessary funds. By the time she saved enough money, her pregnancy was in the second-trimester and she had to have a more involved 2-day procedure. At that point, she was lucky enough to connect with a few funding organizations like the National Network of Abortion Funds, that could help her pay for the abortion which ended up costing $900.

  • T.S., a 38-year-old married mother of two from Pennsylvania, worked full-time for a state-funded mental health association and was taking the birth control pill when she learned that she was pregnant. At the time, she was working on furlough and not receiving any income. Her husband wasn’t able to work because he’d smashed his kneecap in a work-related injury and was fighting to get disability insurance because he was told that he had maxed out. He worked in landscaping, plowing and snow removal.  Their household annual income was $25,000. The couple decided that their marriage was already suffering from the financial strain and another child would not be affordable. Making $12 an hour at her job, T.S. could not afford the $422 abortion, but did receive assistance from funding organizations.

Related Posts

Adams & Boyle, P.C. et al v. Slatery, et al: Order

Abortion,United States,Reporting on Rights

MKB Management Corp v. Burdick: Order Adopting Settlement Stipulation

Order from the trial court adopting the settlement stipulation awarding attorney's fees and costs from the state of North Dakota.

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), Reporting on Rights

MKB Management Corp v. Burdick: Eighth Circuit Court Decision

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), Reporting on Rights

Sign up for our newsletter.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2021)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up