Illegal

Oklahoma

Oklahoma is enforcing a pre-Roe ban that prohibits abortion entirely, except when “necessary to preserve” the life of a pregnant person.

State Legal Details

Bans in Effect

  • Criminalization of Self-managed Abortion
  • Gestational Ban, 22-week LMP
  • Gestational Ban, Total Ban
  • Medication Abortion, Telemedicine Ban
  • Method Ban
  • Pre-Roe ban
  • Trigger Ban

Bans Enjoined

  • Gestational Ban, 6-week LMP
  • Gestational Ban, Total Ban
  • Private Right of Action Ban

Restrictions in Effect

  • Biased Counseling Requirement
  • Parental Involvement, Parental Consent Requirement
  • Parental Involvement, Parental Notification Requirement
  • TRAP Requirements: Facilities, Facility Requirements
  • TRAP requirements: Providers, Reporting Requirement
  • Waiting Period Requirement

State Protections

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has held that the “Oklahoma Constitution protects a limited right to an abortion”1 The Court held:

The Oklahoma Constitution creates an inherent right of a pregnant woman to terminate a pregnancy when necessary to preserve her life…if at any point in the pregnancy, the woman’s physician has determined to a reasonable degree of medical certainty or probability that the continuation of the pregnancy will endanger the woman’s life…Absolute certainty is not required, however, mere possibility or speculation is insufficient.0

The state remains hostile to abortion, Oklahoma’s Public Health Code states that it cannot be “construed as creating or recognizing right to abortion.”2

Restrictions

On June 24, 2022, Oklahoma revived the state’s pre-Roe ban through a trigger law, 3 following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.4 This ban criminalizes all abortions except when “necessary to preserve” the life of the pregnant person  and remains in effect.5 Oklahoma retains other total and early gestational bans that have been found to be unconstitutional by the Oklahoma Supreme Court: a total criminal ban is permanently enjoined as “void” and “unenforceable”6 and two bans enforced through private, civil lawsuits–a 6-week ban and a total ban– have been found unconstitutional.7

Oklahoma has not repealed other laws related to abortion. In 2021, Oklahoma enacted a near total ban8 and a six-week ban,9 both of which are currently enjoined.10 Oklahoma also has a twenty weeks post-fertilization ban with narrow exceptions.11 Oklahoma prohibits D&E procedures12  and abortions sought for reasons of sex selection.13

Oklahoma law continues to include requirements that pregnant people who seek abortion care must undergo a mandatory seventy-two-hour waiting period and biased counseling.14 Additionally, in 2021, Oklahoma enacted a requirement that pregnant people who seek a medication abortion—must be given an ultrasound to confirm gestational age seventy-two hours in advance.15 These requirements are currently enjoined.16 Oklahoma also limits public funding for, and private insurance coverage of, abortion.17 Oklahoma restricts people who self-manage their abortions.18 Oklahoma law generally requires that a parent or legal guardian be notified prior to a minor’s abortion19 and consent to it.20 Alternatively, a judge can approve a minor’s petition.21

Oklahoma retains targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP) laws related to facilities22 and reporting.23 The legislature has not repealed permanently enjoined admitting privileges requirements.24 Oklahoma law continues to restrict the provision of abortion care to licensed physicians who are board certified in obstetrics and gynecology.25 The board certification requirement is currently enjoined.26 Oklahoma still restricts providers from using telemedicine for the provision of abortion care.27 Providers who violate Oklahoma’s abortion restrictions may face civil and criminal penalties.28

Historical Restrictions

In 2022, Oklahoma amended its “trigger” ban in order to revive the state’s pre-Roe ban.29.

Conclusion

Now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe, Oklahoma is enforcing a pre-Roe ban that prohibits abortion entirely, except when “necessary to preserve” the life of a pregnant person.

  1. Okla. Call for Reprod. Justice v. Drummond, 2023 OK 111, 543 P.3d 110 (Okla. 2023). ↩︎
  2. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-729.6. ↩︎
  3. Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 861; see also John M. O’Connor, Certification Letter to Governor Stitt, President Pro Tempore Treat, Speaker McCall, and Secretary Bingman (June 24, 2022). ↩︎
  4. Dobbs v. Jackson Womenu2019s Health Org., 597 U.S (June 24, 2022), revu2019d Dobbs v. Jackson Womenu2019s Health Org., 945 F.3d 265, 274 (5th Cir. 2019). ↩︎
  5. Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 861. ↩︎
  6. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-731.4, enjoined by Okla. Call for Reprod. Justice v. Drummond, 2023 OK 24, 526 P.3d 1123 (Okla. Mar. 21, 2023). ↩︎
  7. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-745.31; S.B. 1503, 58th Leg., 2nd Reg. Sess. (Ok. 2022) (6-week, private right of enforcement ban); H.B. 4327, 58th Leg., 2nd Reg. Sess. (Ok. 2022) (total, private right of enforcement ban), enjoined by Okla. Call for Reprod. Just. v. State, 2023 OK 60, 531 P.3d 117 (Okla. May 31, 2023). ↩︎
  8. Okla. Stat. tit. 59, §§ 509(20), 637(14), which makes the performance of abortion except in cases of life endangerment unprofessional conduct for certain health care professionals. ↩︎
  9. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-731.3 (prohibiting abortion upon detection of a “heartbeat” except in cases of life endangerment or “serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function, not including psychological or emotional conditions”). ↩︎
  10. Okla. Call for Reprod. Just. v. O’Connor, No. 119,918, slip op. at 2 (Okla. Oct. 25, 2021), reh’g denied (Feb. 5, 2024) (case renamed Okla. Call for Reprod. Just. v. Drummond). ↩︎
  11. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-745.5. ↩︎
  12. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-737.9(A). This ban was challenged and enjoined in state court.  Tulsa Women’s Reprod. Clinic, LLC v. Hunter, No. 118,292 (Okla. Oct. 23, 2019). In 2024, the lawsuit was dismissed and the ban went into effect.  Tulsa Women’s Reprod. Clinic LLC v. Drummond, No. 118,292 (Okla. Mar. 12, 2024) (order granting motion to dismiss appeal).  Note that in 2025 the Oklahoma legislature enacted an amendment to this statute that will be effective January 1, 2026 and makes violations a Class D2 felony offense. See H.B. 2104, 60th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. (Ok. 2025) (see Section 602 of the statute). ↩︎
  13. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-731.2(B) (providing an exemption if there is a genetic disorder that is sex-linked). ↩︎
  14. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-738.2(B); Nova Health Sys. v. Pruitt, 2012 OK 103, 292 P.3d 28, as corrected (Okla. 2012) (Oklahoma’s ultrasound requirement is permanently enjoined by court order). ↩︎
  15. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, §§ 1-756.1 et seq. (enacted as part of S.B. 778, 58th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. (Ok. 2021)). ↩︎
  16. Okla. Call for Reprod. Justice v. Drummond, 2023 OK 111, 543 P.3d 110 (Okla. 2023) (temporarily enjoining S.B. 778, S.B. 779, and H.B. 1904, 58th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. (Ok. 2021)). ↩︎
  17. See, e.g., Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-741.1; Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-741.3. ↩︎
  18. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-733.  Note that in 2025 the Oklahoma legislature enacted an amendment to this statute that will be effective January 1, 2026 and makes violations a Class D2 felony offense. See H.B. 2104, 60th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. (Ok. 2025) (see Section 601 of the statute). On November 21, 2023, the Oklahoma Attorney General issued an opinion stating Oklahoma law “does not permit the charging of a pregnant” person with “a misdemeanor or felony for [seeking or intentionally] performing or inducing an abortion” on themselves. 2023-12 Op. Okla. Att’y Gen. (2023), https://www.okmedicalboard.org/download/2335/2023-12_AG_Opinion.pdf. ↩︎
  19. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-740.2(B)(1). ↩︎
  20. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-740.2(B)(3). ↩︎
  21. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-740.3. ↩︎
  22. Okla. Admin. Code §§ 310:600-1-1 et seq. ↩︎
  23. Okla. Admin. Code § 310:600-13-3; Okla. Stat. tit. 63, §§ 1-756.8, 1-756.9 (enacting additional reporting requirements, which are currently enjoined by Okla. Call for Reprod. Just., No. 119,918, slip op. at 2).0:600-13-3; OKLA. STAT. tit. 63, u00a7u00a7 1-756.8, 1-756.9 (enacting additional reporting requirements, which are currently enjoined. Okla. Call for Reprod. Just., No. IN-119,918, slip op. at 2). ↩︎
  24. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-748, enjoined by Burns v. Cline, 2016 OK 122, 387 P.3d 348 (Okla. 2016). ↩︎
  25. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-731. ↩︎
  26. Okla. Call for Reprod. Justice v. Drummond, 2023 OK 111, 543 P.3d 110 (Okla. 2023) (temporarily enjoining S.B. 778, S.B. 779, and H.B. 1904, 58th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. (Ok. 2021)).  Note that in 2025 the Oklahoma legislature amended this statute – effective January 1, 2026 – that clarifies violations are a Class D2 felony offense. See H.B. 2104, 60th Leg., 1st Reg. Sess. (Ok. 2025). ↩︎
  27. Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-729.1 (in effect); Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-729a, invalidated by Okla. Coalition for Reprod. Justice v. Cline, 441 P.3d 1145, 2019 OK 33 (Okla. 2019); Okla. Stat. tit. 63, §§ 1-757.1 et seq, currently enjoined by Okla. Call for Reprod. Just. v. Drummond, 2023 OK 111, 543 P.3d 110 (Okla. 2023). ↩︎
  28. See, e.g., Okla. Stat. tit. 63,§ 1-729.3 (civil penalty); Okla. Stat. tit. 63,§ 1-729.2 (criminal penalty). ↩︎
  29. Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 861; S.B. 1555, 58th Leg., 2nd Reg. Sess. (Ok. 2022), amending 2021 Okla. Sess. Law Serv. Ch. 308 (S.B. 918). John M. Ou2019Connor, Op. Attu2019y. Gen. (Jun. 24, 2022). ↩︎