Securing Abortion Rights at the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC)

K.L. v. Peru (United Nations Human Rights Committee)

Case Status Won
Filed on November 8, 2002

Last Updated
- April 8, 2026
Issue
- Abortion
Place
- Latin America & the Caribbean
- Peru

The United Nations Human Rights Committee established the right to abortion as a human right.

(Updated 3.18.21) The Center for Reproductive Rights persuaded the United Nations Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) to recognize that women have a human right to access safe and legal abortion. In a ruling that has been cited extensively as precedent in other national-level court decisions on abortion access, the UNHRC established that denying access to legal abortion violates the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’ protection from inhuman and degrading treatment, the right to privacy, and the special protection of the rights of children.

About the case

When K.L. was 17 years old, she found out that she was pregnant and received a fetal anomaly diagnosis of anencephaly. Even though abortion is legal in Peru for therapeutic reasons, K.L. was illegally denied access to an abortion by the hospital director and was compelled to carry the pregnancy to term. The baby survived for four days after birth, and was breastfed by K.L. during that time.

Her case, brought before the UNHRC by the Center in partnership with the Latin American and Caribbean Committee for the Defense of Women’s Rights (CLADEM) and the Counseling Center for the Defense of Women’s Rights (DEMUS), alleged that K.L.’s pregnancy severely compromised her life by endangering her physical and psychological health. The complaint stated that the second half of her pregnancy, during which she desired but was denied an abortion, was a clear violation of international human rights standards.

About the ruling

On November 17, 2005, the UNHRC established that denying access to a legal abortion in such a case violated international standards prohibiting violence against women. The ruling stablished the right to special protection as a minor and the right to be free of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment by state officials.

As a result of this ruling, Peru improved its legal and administrative policies on sexual violence. The case marked the first time an international human rights body has held a government accountable for failing to ensure access to legal abortion services.