Protecting the Right to Privacy for Pregnant Women in South Carolina

Ferguson v. City of Charleston
  • Case Status Won
  • Filed on
  • Last Updated
  • Issue
    • Maternal Health
  • Place
    • South Carolina
    • United States

This U.S. Supreme Court case asserted pregnant women’s right to privacy against non-consensual drug testing.

Summary

The Center brought this case on behalf of ten women targeted by a “Search and Arrest” policy initiated in 1989 by the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) and local law enforcement officials. Under the policy, MUSC medical personnel secretly searched a targeted group of pregnant women, without a warrant, for evidence of cocaine use so that police could arrest them for the crimes of possession of drugs, child neglect, or distribution of drugs to a person under eighteen.

About the case and rulings

About the case and rulings

The searches were conducted only at MUSC, the one hospital in Charleston where the patient population was predominately low-income and African American. With the hospital’s assistance, police arrested women days or even hours after delivery, removing them from their hospital beds in handcuffs and in shackles. Some women were taken to jail while still bleeding from giving birth. Others were arrested and jailed while they were pregnant, even though the prison could not provide prenatal care or drug treatment. When the incarcerated women went into labor, they were returned to the hospital in shackles. One woman was handcuffed to her bed throughout her delivery.

CRR fought this case all the way up the United States Supreme Court, which ruled in our favor, holding that the searches, which were conducted without warrants or probable cause, violated the Fourth Amendment. The Court affirmed that the “special needs” exception to the warrant and probable cause requirements should not be applied to law enforcement searches of citizens, who have a reasonable expectation of privacy in medical and other personal matters.

Every major medical group in the country, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the March of Dimes, opposes using punitive methods, such as the “Search and Arrest” policy, to address the problem of substance abuse during pregnancy. Studies show that threatening women with arrest and jail time deters them from seeking critical prenatal and postnatal care and drug treatment and could thereby actually harm their health and the health of their children.

Case details

Related stories Timeline

News and updates

January 1, 1993
Center filed case
October 4, 2000
Case argued at the U.S. Supreme Court
March 21, 2001
U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Center, ruling public hospitals could not drug test pregnant women without their consent

Take action

Get Involved Get Involved Stand up for repro rights

Double Your Impact for Reproductive Freedom

Every dollar to the Center is matched 2X, now through June 30. Don't wait.

collage of repro images