MKB Management, Inc. v. Burdick

09.15.2014

Primary Content
Text

(REVISED 6.2.2016) In 2013, North Dakota passed a blatantly unconstitutional ban on pre-viability abortion that would prohibit abortion as early as six weeks into a pregnancy.  Physicians violating the ban would face up to five years in prison.

Despite the United States Supreme Court’s very clear rulings that states may not ban abortion before viability, some politicians have passed laws like this one to do just that.  North Dakota’s law was among the most extreme of the attempts to ban abortion pre-viability.  In requiring a doctor to attempt to detect a fetal “heartbeat” before performing an abortion, and then banning abortion if cardiac activity is detected, North Dakota effectively banned all abortions beginning at six weeks of pregnancy.  The majority of abortions take place between seven and twelve weeks of pregnancy.

 

Plaintiff(s):  MKB Management Corp, d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic, Kathryn Eggleston, M.D. 

Center Attorney(s): Janet Crepps, David Brown, Zoe Levine

Co-Counsel/Cooperating Attorneys: Thomas Dickson (Dickson Law Office)

Summary: 

The Center for Reproductive Rights challenged the law on behalf of North Dakota’s only abortion clinic, one of its doctors, and the clinic’s patients.  The Center filed its lawsuit in June of 2013, arguing that the ban violated patients’ Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection of the laws. North Dakota contended that the law did not ban pre-viability abortions because the state believes viability begins at conception and that Roe v. Wade should be overturned. North Dakota submitted voluminous papers, including arguments that being forced to carry a pregnancy to term is not an economic burden to women and does not hinder a woman’s ability to continue her education or participate in the workforce, and that abortion has hurt the economy of North Dakota because of the loss of potential wage earners.

The trial court granted the Center’s motion for summary judgment in April 2014, invalidating the law as unconstitutional. The state appealed in May 2014, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit heard oral argument in the case in January 2015.  On July 22, the Eighth Circuit upheld the trial court's decision that the law was unconstitutional. On November 10, the State filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, asking them to review the case. On January 25, 2016, the Supreme Court declined to hear the case and on April 13, the trial court adopted a settlement stipulation between the Plaintiffs and the State ordering that the state of North Dakota pay $245,000 in attorney's fees and costs. This case is now over and the ban has been permanently struck down as unconstitutional.

State


Status


Owner