Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Isaacson, et al. v. Brnovich, et al.

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • The Center’s Impact
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Corporate Engagement
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • Cases Archive
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Global Advocacy
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Stories
    • Events
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Press Releases
    • Statements
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • U.S. Abortion Rights: Resources
    • Maps
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
    • Repro Red Flags: Agency Watch
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Become a Monthly Donor
    • Make a Donor Advised Fund Gift
    • Leave a Legacy Gift
    • Donate Gifts of Stock
    • Give a Gift in Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Employee Matching Gifts
    • Mail a Check
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

  • Overview

Share this page

Donate Now

Join Now

Isaacson, et al. v. Brnovich, et al.

Filing date: 08.17.2021
This case challenges two Arizona measures that would ban abortion care if there is indication of fetal diagnosis in the patient’s reason and grant new “personhood” rights for fetuses, embryos and fertilized eggs.

Share this page

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id

(Updated 07.07.22) On June 25, an emergency request was made asking a federal court to block Arizona’s personhood law as applied to abortion. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for July 8.

The Center for Reproductive Rights and its partners filed the lawsuit in August 2021 challenging two Arizona abortion restrictions passed in April. One provision, which targets pregnant people facing complex considerations regarding their medical care, would ban abortion if there is any indication that the patient’s reason is a fetal condition or diagnosis.  The other restriction would grant “personhood” rights to fetuses, embryos, and fertilized eggs in a manner that threatens to criminalize essential medical care for pregnant patients and places them at risk of arbitrary prosecution for a vast array of actions that could harm an embryo or fetus.  

Filed in federal district court in Arizona, the lawsuit aims to secure a preliminary injunction before the measures take effect on September 29, 2021. The plaintiffs in the suit—two Arizona physicians, the Arizona Medical Association, National Council of Jewish Women Arizona, and the Arizona National Organization of Women—are being represented by the Center, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the ACLU of Arizona. 

Defendants in the lawsuit include the Arizona Attorney General, every Arizona County Attorney, the Arizona Medical Board and certain officials of the board, and the Arizona Department of Health Services and certain officials of the department, all of whom would have a role in the enforcement of the challenged provisions. 

Arizona has several existing abortion restrictions that make it difficult for people to access abortion care, including a mandatory 24-hour waiting period for people seeking abortion; a ban on the use of telemedicine for medication abortion services; and a law banning advanced practice clinicians like nurse practitioners from providing abortion care. If the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, Arizona and nearly half the states in the country are poised to ban abortion entirely.

The law being challenged adds a fetal diagnosis reason ban to Arizona’s existing sex and race reason bans enacted in 2011, taking away patients’ constitutional right to choose a pre-viability abortion. The “personhood requirement” would anoint fetuses, embryos, and fertilized eggs with the same “rights and privileges” as “other persons” for purposes of all Arizona law. This sweeping measure threatens both health care providers and pregnant women with criminal liability for a wide range of actions that could impact a pregnancy. 

Center Attorneys: Jessica Sklarsky, Gail Deady, Jen Rasay, Cici Coquillette, Jared Lindo

Co-Counsel/Cooperating Attorneys: Alexa Kolbi-Molinas and Rebecca Chan, American Civil Liberties Union; Victoria Lopez, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Arizona

Plaintiffs: Paul A. Isaacson, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients; Eric M. Reuss, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients; National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section), Inc.; Arizona National Organization For Women; and Arizona Medical Association, on behalf of itself, its members and its members’ patients

Status:

We filed our complaint and request for a preliminary injunction (PI) in federal district court on August 17, 2021. A hearing on the request for a PI took place September 22. On September 28, a federal district court judge granted the request to temporarily block the provision that would ban abortions sought due to the presence or presumed presence of a fetal condition. However, the provision that grants personhood “rights, privileges, and immunities” to fetuses, embryos, and fertilized eggs was allowed to take effect. The State appealed the injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and also requested a partial stay of the injunction while the appeal is pending, to allow the State to enforce the reason ban.  We cross-appealed on the denial of the injunction as to the privileges and immunities provision.  The district court denied the request for a partial stay on October 18, and the appellate court denied the request on November 26. We filed our principal and response brief at the appellate court on December 20 and on December 27, amicus briefs were filed in support of our case. While the appeal was in briefing, on December 10, the State also filed an emergency application with the U.S. Supreme Court requesting a stay of the injunction while the appeal is pending. We filed our response on December 21 and are now awaiting a ruling. The appeal at the Ninth Circuit is fully briefed and we are awaiting an oral argument date. At the district court, the case is now in discovery.

Legal documents:

  • Complaint: Isaacson & Reuss, Arizona Medical Association, National Council of Jewish Women Arizona, and the Arizona National Organization of Women v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona et al., 8.17.2021
  • Motion and Memorandum of Support for Preliminary Injunction, 8.17.2021
  • District Court Order, 9.28.21
  • Opposition to Motion to Stay, 10.13.2021
  • Appellate Opposition to Motion to Stay, 10.29.2021
  • Application for Partial Stay, U.S. Supreme Court, 12.10.2021
  • Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants’ Principal and Response Brief, 12.20.2021
  • Response in Opposition to Application for Partial Stay, U.S. Supreme Court, 12.21.2021
  • Brief of National Advocates for Pregnant Women et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 12.23.2021
  • Brief of Disability Rights Advocates as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 12.27.2021
  • Brief of States as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 12.27.2021
  • Brief of Amici Curiae American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists et al. in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 12.27.2021

Feature Story:

  • Center and Partners Sue to Stop New Arizona Abortion Restrictions, 8.17.2021
  • Center in the Spotlight: Lawsuit seeks to block Arizona ban on Down syndrome abortion, 8.17.2021
  • Center in the Spotlight: Lawsuit seeks to block new sweeping anti-abortion law in Arizona, 8.17.2021
  • Lawsuit by the Center and Partners Blocks Arizona’s “Reason” Abortion Ban, 9.29.2021

Press release:

  • Medical Experts and Civil Rights Groups File Lawsuit to Block New Arizona Abortion Ban, 8.17.2021
  • New Arizona Abortion Ban Blocked Hours Before Taking Effect, 9.29.2021

Get the latest news on reproductive rights and opportunities to take action.

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Legal Restrictions, Other Barriers

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Case Status:

Open

Case Archive

For updates on Center cases, explore our case archive here.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Gift Acceptance Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2024)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Better Business Bureau Charity Watch Top Rated Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up
You can have 2X the impact.

All gifts doubled through June 30.

GIVE NOW
Abortion is Essential sign