Skip to content
Center for Reproductive Rights
Center for Reproductive Rights

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

In Mississippi’s Effort to Take Away Abortion Rights, Disregard for Those Impacted

Center for Reproductive Rights - Center for Reproductive Rights - search logo
search Close Close icon
Center for Reproductive Rights -
Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate

Primary Menu

  • About
    • Overview
    • Center Leadership & Staff
    • Pro Bono Program
    • Creative Council
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact Us
    • Careers
    • Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
  • Work
    • Overview
    • Litigation
    • Legal Policy and Advocacy
    • Resources & Research
    • Recent Case Highlights
    • Landmark Cases
    • World’s Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Issues
    • Overview
    • Abortion
    • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights
    • Assisted Reproduction
    • Contraception
    • Humanitarian Settings
    • Maternal Health
    • COVID-19
  • Regions
    • Overview
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Latin America and the Caribbean
    • United States
    • Global Advocacy
  • News
    • Latest News
    • Center in the Spotlight
    • Events
    • Press Releases
    • Press Room
    • Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Resources & Research
    • World Abortion Laws Map
    • After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State
  • Act
    • Overview
    • Give
    • Act
    • Learn
  • Donate
    • Make a Gift Now
    • Be a Champion
    • Join the Advocates Council
    • Become a Major Donor
    • Give Through Your Donor-Advised Fund
    • Make a Gift In Honor
    • Attend an Event
    • Leave a Legacy
    • More Ways to Give
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

Related Content

Issues:

Abortion, Legal Restrictions

Regions:

United States

Work:

In the Courts

Type:

News, Story

Case Archive

For updates on this case and others, explore our case archive here.

Follow the Center

Donate Now

Join Now

08.19.2021

In the Courts Abortion United States Story

In Mississippi’s Effort to Take Away Abortion Rights, Disregard for Those Impacted

Virginia Sobol
In the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health case, Mississippi urges the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Share this Story

  • facebook
  • Twitter
  • linkedin
  • Email id
Photo credit: Kathleen Flynn for the Center for Reproductive Rights

In its opening brief to defend a state abortion ban, the state of Mississippi urges the U.S. Supreme Court to take away the constitutional right to abortion—and disregards those people who would be impacted by such a ruling.

Mississippi’s brief, filed July 22 in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, explicitly and repeatedly asks the Supreme Court to overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey and to rule that there is no right to abortion protected by the U.S. Constitution. 

Read more about the Supreme Court abortion case:

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization link

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

In a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, this fall the U.S. Supreme Court will review Mississippi’s pre-viability abortion ban.

The Center for Reproductive Rights will be arguing the case against Mississippi this fall at the Supreme Court. At issue is Mississippi’s ban prohibiting abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy—a ban that was enacted in direct violation to Roe’s core holding that every pregnant person has the right to decide whether to continue their pregnancy prior to viability.

“Mississippi has stunningly asked the Supreme Court to overturn Roe and every other abortion rights decision in the last five decades, said Nancy Northup, Center president and CEO in a statement. “Their goal is for the Supreme Court to take away our right to control our own bodies and our own futures—not just in Mississippi, but everywhere.” 

Mississippi Ignores Realities: How Abortion Bans Impact People

In its brief, Mississippi claims that no one relies on the right to abortion—ignoring the millions of people who have had abortions and the reality that one in four women in the U.S. will have an abortion at some point in her lifetime. The state also ignores the many who have made their own decisions to continue pregnancies and have children based on their own values and beliefs — not on the government deciding for them.

In addition, the state disregards the people for whom a reversal of Roe and Casey would have the most devasting impact. The Mississippi ban would fall hardest on people already facing obstacles to accessing care:  Black, Indigenous and other people of color, those struggling to make ends meet, LGBTQI+ people, immigrants, young people, those living in rural communities, and people with disabilities. Among other things, people living with low incomes are more likely to have abortions in the second trimester, including after 15 weeks—which the Mississippi ban would prohibit—because they need time to secure funds to pay for the procedure as well as costs for childcare, transportation, and possibly a place to stay.  

Mississippi is already an abortion desert.

Abortion in MississippiAbortion in Mississippi link

Abortion in Mississippi

With numerous restrictions on abortion care, only one clinic remains in the state.

Mississippi has passed numerous restrictions on abortion that have made care difficult to access in general as well as earlier in pregnancy. Only one abortion clinic remains in the state—Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Center’s client in this case—and patients must make two in-person visits to the clinic, separated by at least 24 hours. Some patients must travel hundreds of miles to obtain care, twice.

The state’s brief also fails to address the risks of continuing a pregnancy and childbirth, as well as the alarming maternal mortality rates in the state and throughout the country. Mississippi has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the U.S. and high rates of maternal mortality—especially for Black women, who are nearly three times more likely to die of pregnancy-related complications than white women.

Mississippi Makes Arguments Already Rejected by the Supreme Court in Previous Abortion Cases

Mississippi’s brief in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization makes arguments for a Roe reversal that the Supreme Court has considered and rejected before—including that the Constitution does not protect the right to abortion and that reversing Roe could quell division about abortion.  

In 1992 the Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey was asked to overrule Roe and did not. Casey re-affirmed Roe’s central holding—that every person has the right to obtain an abortion before viability. In doing so, it outlined the importance of the right to abortion to women’s participation in the social and economic life of the nation and pointed out that an entire generation of Americans had relied on the right to abortion to shape their lives and futures. Today, two generations—spanning half a century—have relied on this right to make basic decisions about their bodies, lives, and futures.

WHPA would protect abortion access in the U.S.

Women's Health Protection Act (WHPA)Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA) link

Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA)

WHPA is federal legislation that would protect the right to access abortion care throughout the U.S. by creating a safeguard against bans and medically unnecessary restrictions.

“The Court has held that the Constitution guarantees this right. If Roe falls, half the states in the country are poised to ban abortion entirely,” said Northup. “Women of child-bearing age in the U.S. have never known a world in which they don’t have this basic right, and we will keep fighting to make sure they never will.”

“The law and decades of Supreme Court precedent are on our side,” said Hillary Schneller, Senior Staff Attorney at the Center. “With that precedent, and the fact that millions of people have relied and continue to rely on the constitutional right to make decisions about pregnancy and abortion, the Court should once again reject Mississippi’s arguments and agree that its ban is unconstitutional.”

Read more:

  • Case section: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
  • What if the Supreme Court overturns Roe? 07.27.21
  • Mississippi Abortion Ban Case Before the U.S. Supreme Court Poses a Direct Challenge to Roe v. Wade, 07.22.21
  • Press statement: Mississippi Asks Supreme Court to Overturn Roe, 07.22.21

Tags: Scotus abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, Supreme Court review of Mississippi abortion ban, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, WHPA, abortion in mississippi, mississippi abortion case, Scotus Mississippi abortion case

Related Posts

Congressman Don Beyer to Speak Out in Support of Federal Women’s Health Protection Act at Community Event in Virginia

Congressman Don Beyer to Speak Out in Support of Federal Women’s Health Protection Act at Community Event in Virginia (MEDIA...

Abortion, Legal Protections,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA)

Austin City Council Members Speak Out in Support of Federal Women’s Health Protection Act, Call for Repeal of Texas HB2

Austin City Council Members Support Women’s Health Protection Act, Call for Repeal of Texas HB2 Center for Reproductive Rights President...

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA)

Restoring Our Rights: The Women’s Health Protection Act Report

Abortion rights have been under attack for years in the United States, through laws that shut down clinics, impose medically...

Abortion, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care, Maternal Mortality,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), In Washington D.C.
Restoring Our Rights: The Women’s Health Protection Act Report

Sign up for email updates.

The most up-to-date news on reproductive rights, delivered straight to you.

Footer Menu

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Center for Reproductive Rights
© (1992-2022)

Use of this site signifies agreement with our disclaimer and privacy policy.

Center for Reproductive Rights
This site uses necessary, analytics and social media cookies to improve your experience and deliver targeted advertising. Click "Options" or click here to learn more and customize your cookie settings, otherwise please click "Accept" to proceed.
OPTIONSACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-6619340-11 minuteNo description
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the wbsite is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages viisted in an anonymous form.
_parsely_session30 minutesThis cookie is used to track the behavior of a user within the current session.
HotJar: _hjAbsoluteSessionInProgress30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjFirstSeen30 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjid1 yearThis cookie is set by Hotjar. This cookie is set when the customer first lands on a page with the Hotjar script. It is used to persist the random user ID, unique to that site on the browser. This ensures that behavior in subsequent visits to the same site will be attributed to the same user ID.
HotJar: _hjIncludedInPageviewSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjIncludedInSessionSample2 minutesNo description
HotJar: _hjTLDTestsessionNo description
SSCVER1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for online advertising by creating user profile based on their preferences.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
_fbp3 monthsThis cookie is set by Facebook to deliver advertisement when they are on Facebook or a digital platform powered by Facebook advertising after visiting this website.
fr3 monthsThe cookie is set by Facebook to show relevant advertisments to the users and measure and improve the advertisements. The cookie also tracks the behavior of the user across the web on sites that have Facebook pixel or Facebook social plugin.
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
IMRID1 year 24 daysThe domain of this cookie is owned by Nielsen. The cookie is used for storing the start and end of the user session for nielsen statistics. It helps in consumer profiling for online advertising.
personalization_id2 yearsThis cookie is set by twitter.com. It is used integrate the sharing features of this social media. It also stores information about how the user uses the website for tracking and targeting.
TDID1 yearThe cookie is set by CloudFare service to store a unique ID to identify a returning users device which then is used for targeted advertising.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
CookieDurationDescription
adEdition1 dayNo description
akaas_MSNBC10 daysNo description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others1 yearNo description
geoEdition1 dayNo description
next-i18next1 yearNo description
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo
Scroll Up