Center for Reproductive Rights
Donate
icon-hamburger icon-magnifying-glass Donate
icon-magnifying-glass-teal

Amy Bryant, M.D., M.S.C.R., et al. vs. Jim Woodall, et al.: Memoradum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgement

Menu Close Menu Close icon
Donate
Work Issues Regions Types Year
In the Courts At the United Nations Engaging Policymakers Around the World In the States (USA) In Washington D.C. U.S. Administrative Advocacy U.S. Congressional Advocacy Reporting on Rights
Abortion Anti-Choice Harassment Definitions Legal Protections Legal Restrictions Other Barriers Adolescent SRHR Female Genital Mutilation Sex Education Assisted Reproduction Embryo Personhood and Custody IVF Surrogacy Biased Information Censorship Contraception Emergency Contraception Legal Protections Legal Restrictions COVID-19 Funding for Reproductive Healthcare Other Financial Barriers Public Funding Global Gag Rule HIV/AIDS Discriminatory Policies Right to Care Humanitarian Settings Maternal Health Access to Quality Care Coercive Policies Maternal Mortality Medical Education SRHR General
Africa Benin Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Côte d'Ivoire Ethiopia Ghana Kenya Malawi Mali Nigeria Rwanda South Africa Uganda Tanzania Zambia Zimbabwe Senegal Asia China Bangladesh India Malaysia Nepal Pakistan Philippines Sri Lanka Thailand Vietnam Europe Bulgaria Croatia Czech Republic France Hungary Lithuania Ireland Albania Malta Moldova Northern Ireland Poland Romania Russia Slovakia Spain Ukraine Latin America & Caribbean Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Ecuador El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Jamaica Mexico Nicaragua Peru Uruguay United States Global Accountability Bodies African Human Rights System Inter-American Human Rights System European Human Rights System United Nations
US Repro Watch Case Case Document Court Filings Court Opinions & Orders Testimony Documents Briefing Papers Legal Analyses Other Shadow Letters & Reports UN Concluding Observations Events News Press Releases Story Center in the Spotlight Publications Books & Reports Fact Sheets Newsletter Resources Uncategorized
2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1970
Selected Center in the Spotlight Case Document 2016
Advanced Search
Work
Issues
Regions
Types
Year
Selected Center in the Spotlight Case Document 2016

Amy Bryant, M.D., M.S.C.R., et al. vs. Jim Woodall, et al.: Memoradum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgement

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt: Order

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

June Medical Services v. Gee: First Amended Complaint

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Trump’s Health Secretary Pick Threatens Women’s Care

Trump’s Health Secretary Pick Threatens Women's Care Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, spoke with Rachel Maddow about concerns that Rep. Tom Price, who is slated to be Donald Trump's [...]

Abortion, Legal Protections, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Center in the Spotlight

Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt: Motion for TRO or PI

Abortion,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt: Complaint

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands vs. State of Alaska: Complaint

Download PDF (1.1MB): Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands vs. State of Alaska: Complaint

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Amy Bryant, M.D., M.S.C.R., et al. vs. Jim Woodall, et al.: Complaint

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Give Today

Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Notice of Appeal

         

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Trump and the Supreme Court: What Happens Now?

Trump and the Supreme Court: What Happens Now? The consequences of Donald Trump’s election as president may be enormous for the makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump has pledged to appoint conservative, anti-choice justices, [...]

Abortion, Legal Protections, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Center in the Spotlight

Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Court Decision Re: Motion for Summary Judgment

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Women’s Strike Defeats Abortion Ban in Poland

Women’s Strike Defeats Abortion Ban in Poland On October 3, seven million women in Poland went on strike, outraged by a proposal that would completely ban abortion—and punish women who end a pregnancy with up [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,Europe, Poland,Engaging Policymakers, Around the World,Center in the Spotlight

Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt: Plantiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts,Case Document
Next

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Give Now