Latest News

Advanced Search

CRR Blasts Health and Human Services Secretary’s Intervention to Block FDA Approval of Plan B One-Step for Over-the-Counter, All-Ages Use

(PRESS RELEASE) The Center for Reproductive Rights strongly criticizes U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius' decision to intervene and block the Food and Drug Administration's expected approval of emergency contraceptive Plan [...]

Contraception, Emergency Contraception,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In Washington D.C.,News

Verified Petition and Application for Restraining Order: Hodes & Nauser, MDs, P.A. et al. v. Robert Moser, M.D et al.

This case challenges the constitutionality of onerous regulations and a sham licensing process adopted and implemented by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) that will cause most of the abortion providers in the [...]

Case Document

Brief in Support of Motion for Temporary Injunction: Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice v. Cline

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Complaint: Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice, et al. v. Terry Cline

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Complaint: Stuart et al v. Huff

The Center is challenging a newly enacted North Carolina law which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion until four hours after her physician performs an ultrasound, places the ultrasound images in her view, and [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Plaintiffs-Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction: Hodes & Nauser, MDs, P.A. et al. v. Robert Moser, M.D et al.

This case challenges the constitutionality of onerous temporary regulations and a sham licensing process adopted and implemented by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) that will cause most of the abortion providers in [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Intervene by AAPLOG: Hodes & Nauser, MDs, P.A. et al. v. Robert Moser, M.D et al.

This case challenges the constitutionality of onerous temporary regulations and a sham licensing process adopted and implemented by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) that will cause most of the abortion providers in [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Memo of Support: MKB Management Corp d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic, Kathryn Eggleston, M.D., v. Birch Burdick and Terry Dwelle, M.D.

This case challenges provisions of North Dakota House Bill 1297, passed during the 2011 legislative session, which would effectively ban all medication abortions in the state by requiring compliance with conditions for the provision of [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), Reporting on Rights,Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Complaint: MKB Management Corp d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic, Kathryn Eggleston, M.D., v. Birch Burdick and Terry Dwelle, M.D.

This case challenges provisions of North Dakota House Bill 1297, passed during the 2011 legislative session, which would effectively ban all medication abortions in the state by requiring compliance with conditions for the provision of [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA), Reporting on Rights,Case Document

Appendix of Facts Supporting Plaintiffs’ Motion for PI: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey

The Center is challenging a newly enacted Texas law which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless her physician first performs an ultrasound, places the ultrasound images in her view, describes the images to [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injuction: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey

The Center is challenging a newly enacted Texas law which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless her physician first performs an ultrasound, places the ultrasound images in her view, describes the images to [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Complaint: Hodes & Nauser, MDs, P.A. et al. v. Robert Moser, M.D et al.

This case challenges the constitutionality of onerous temporary regulations and a sham licensing process adopted and implemented by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) that will cause most of the abortion providers in [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Exhibit 1 to Amended Complaint—House Bill 15: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey

The Center is challenging a newly enacted Texas law which prohibits a woman from getting an abortion unless her physician first performs an ultrasound, places the ultrasound images in her view, describes the images to [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care, Coercive Policies,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.