In re Access to Emergency Contraception in Chile (Chilean Constitutional Court)
On April 13, 2007, the Center filed a third party intervention in support of the national reproductive health and family planning regulations authorizing the free distribution of emergency contraception (EC). The Center’s intervention was a [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Discovery Order Suggesting Bad Faith on Part of FDA
February, 2006New YorkPOHORELSKY, Magistrate Judge:The plaintiffs in this action seek judicial review, under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), see 5 U.S.C. § 706, and the United States Constitution, of the actions taken by the Food [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: White House Discovery Order
November 2006 POHORELSKY, Magistrate Judge:Before the court are various issues concerning discovery in this action, which challenges several determinations made by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)1 concerning Plan B, the so-called “morning after” pill. [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Steven Galson Decision Part 2
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Steven Galson Decision Part 1
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Janet Woodcock Deposition Part 2
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Janet Woodcock Deposition Part 1
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Lester Crawford Deposition
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Reproductive rights are human rights.
Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: John Jenkins Deposition
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Susan Wood Deposition
On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]
Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Complaint
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINTPlaintiffs, by and through their undersigned attorneys, bring this complaint against the defendant, his agents and successors in office, and [...]
Aid for Women v. Foulston
The Center for Reproductive Rights initiated this case in 2003 after then-Kansas Attorney General Phil Kline issued an opinion that construed the State's child-abuse reporting statute to require doctors, nurses, school counselors, psychotherapists, and others [...]
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Albany, et. al. v. Serio: Appellate Division Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered December 2, 2003 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. This appeal presents constitutional and [...]
Reproductive rights are human rights.
Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.
