Advanced Search

Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma order on Personhood ballot initiative

On April 30, 2012, the Oklahoma Supreme Court issued a unanimous order stating that Initiative Petition 395 was "clearly unconstitutional," citing Planned Parenthood v. Casey, and could not be added to the state ballot in [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions, Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Protest to In re Initiative Petition 395, State Question No. 761 (OK Personhood)

This is a pre-election challenge to a blatantly unconstitutional ballot initiative proposed in Oklahoma that would define a fertilized egg as a "person," thereby banning abortion and most forms of contraception, as well as interfering [...]

Abortion, Legal Restrictions, Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Legal Restrictions, Maternal Health, Access to Quality Care,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Tummino v. Margaret Hamburg: Memo of Law in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Civil Contempt

Plaintiffs respectfully submit this memorandum of law in support of their motion for civil contempt against Defendant (hereinafter "the FDA") based on the FDA‟s failure to make any meaningful efforts to comply with the portion [...]

Abortion, Anti-Choice Harassment, Legal Restrictions, Other Barriers, Adolescent SRHR, Biased Information, Censorship, Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Legal Restrictions, Medical Education,United States,In the Courts, Engaging Policymakers, In the States (USA),Case Document

Citizens’s Petition (Supplement 2002): Food and Drug Administration

In 2001, the Center, along with the Reproductive Health Technologies Project and numerous women's health organizations, filed a Citizen's Petition to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), urging the agency to switch emergency contraception drugs [...]

Legal Restrictions, Adolescent SRHR, Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Legal Restrictions,Case Document

Citizens’s Petition (Supplement 2001): Food and Drug Administration

In 2001, the Center, along with the Reproductive Health Technologies Project and numerous women's health organizations, filed a Citizen's Petition to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), urging the agency to switch emergency contraception drugs [...]

Legal Restrictions, Adolescent SRHR, Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Legal Restrictions,Case Document

Citizens’s Petition: Food and Drug Administration

In 2001, the Center, along with the Reproductive Health Technologies Project and numerous women's health organizations, filed a Citizen's Petition to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), urging the agency to switch emergency contraception drugs [...]

Legal Restrictions, Adolescent SRHR, Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Legal Restrictions,Case Document

Morning-After Pill Conspiracy: Interview with Annie Tummino

Annie Tummino, 26, works at  Realbirth, a childbirth education and post-partum support center in New York City. She is also chair of the Women’s Liberation Birth Control Project, and has been a coordinator with the [...]

Contraception, Emergency Contraception,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Tummino v. von Eschenbach: FDA Decision 2009

On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]

Contraception, Emergency Contraception,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Steven Galson Decision Part 2

On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]

Contraception, Emergency Contraception,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Steven Galson Decision Part 1

On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]

Contraception, Emergency Contraception,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Janet Woodcock Deposition Part 2

On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]

Contraception, Emergency Contraception,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Janet Woodcock Deposition Part 1

On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]

Contraception, Emergency Contraception,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Tummino v. von Eschenbach: Lester Crawford Deposition

On March 23, 2009, the Center scored a major victory when a federal court ruled that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had put politics before women's health when it decided to limit over-the-counter access [...]

Contraception, Emergency Contraception,United States,In the Courts,Case Document

Reproductive rights are human rights.

Help us ensure that every government around the world guarantees them.

Scroll Up