No Abortion Ban: Learn More

Since 1976, the Hyde Amendment has been used to ban the federal government from spending money on abortion. Now the Stupak-Pitts and Nelson-Hatch amendments are trying to expand Hyde into the private insurance marketplace for the first time ever.

The bottom line is simple: Stupak-Pitts would make it nearly impossible for private insurance companies that participate in the new healthcare reform to offer abortion services coverage to women, even when those women use their own money to purchase coverage. Nelson-Hatch would require women to pay separately for abortion coverage and piles on administrative requirements that one of the leading health policy experts, George Washington University Professor Sara Rosenbaum, has said will likely ‘chill’ insurers from providing abortion coverage at all. These measures, both punitive and unnecessary, go too far.

Learn more about why these amendments threaten to seriously compromise women’s privacy and safety:

No Abortion Ban

Nelson Amendment Goes Far Beyond Current Law with New Restrictions on Abortion Services Coverage >


Healthcare Reform in Hyde Amendment's Shadow >


Senate Should Vote Down Casey Amendment on Conscience Clause and Oppose its Inclusion in Final Negotiated Heathcare Reform Bill >


The Stupak-Pitts Amendment Goes Far Beyond the Already-Punishing Restrictions in the Hyde Amendment >


Senate Should Maintain Fair and Balanced Conscience Clause Provisions on Abortion Services Coverage in Health Reform Bill >


Why the Stupak-Pitts Abortion Ban is An Unprecedented and Damaging Assault to Women's Health >


Facts on Stupak-Pitts Amendment and the Threat to Women’s Health >


“Punishing, Invasive and Painful” >

Statement of D.J. Feldman on Harmful Impact of Abortion Coverage Restrictions


Health Care Reform Cannot Roll Back the Clock on Women’s Healthcare Needs >


No Abortion Ban Campaign Launch in DC: Listen to the Live Recording >